smiles 0 #1 November 22, 2002 Hello, Read in Vancouver Sun newspaper, (B.C. Canada) about 2 Seattle BASE jumpers and video man getting arrested for BASE off 42 ft. high rise in the city. One jumper landed on parked car...some damage to a buildings gutter.... As this reporter did not give much info, anyone know more specific details? I have questions to ask regarding this report. 1. Did the Seattle BASE jumpers not do enough research- and what research would be sufficient to BASE a building in the middle of busy downtown? How & why was decision made to BASE 42 ft. building when 52 ft. building a few blocks away.... 2. How is it possible that 3 people got arrested at the scene? 3. Were the BASE jumpers not experienced? 4. Shit happens but don't BASE jumpers feel as skydivers when it comes to promoting their sport? 5. Did Vancouver police confiscate gear, camera & video? What was the charge given? Smiles Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
konradptr 0 #2 November 22, 2002 I don't BASE yet, but it doesn't seem possible to jump a ~50ft anything... Was it a 34 or 43 story apartment building??? ------------------------------------------ Getting banned isn't that bad...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TomAiello 26 #3 November 22, 2002 Legal action is still pending in this case. We should probably hold off public discussion of it until after all legal action is resolved.-- Tom Aiello Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com SnakeRiverBASE.com Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
base311 0 #4 November 22, 2002 That is a good call, Tom. I can tell you that the internet was used in a case in which I was a character witness for the defense. The prosecutors, even though their case was a bunch of malarky and poorly presented, still used information they had obtained from the internet. It was weak information, but from the internet nonetheless. I can imagine a good quality researcher could really dig up some useful stuff for a prosecution if he/she wanted. When it comes to discussion of Outlaw BASE Events, things are better left unwritten/unsaid. If you want to discuss it, perhaps pm each other back and forth.. or go to the pub and chat... somehwere where a guest-searchable record isn't maintained. Gardner Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zenister 0 #5 November 22, 2002 i totally agree Tom, holding off on internet discussion until the legalities are over is always the best route..no need to make a bad situation worse.. but i have tons of questions reguarding their ground prep (i'm not a BASE jumper yet, but have observed hundreds of hit and run rappels from buildings all over the US and your ground prep and egress route planning should always be very very high on your priority list ____________________________________ Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lolie 0 #6 November 22, 2002 Quotearrested for BASE off 42 ft. high rise Article says they were jumping from the 42nd floor. -Miranda you shall above all things be glad and young / For if you're young,whatever life you wear it will become you;and if you are glad / whatever's living will yourself become. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
narcimund 0 #7 November 22, 2002 That's good. I am DEFINITELY not going stowed from 42 ft. First Class Citizen Twice Over Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JDBoston 0 #8 November 22, 2002 I'd go from 42 feet with no gear whatsoever over water... Joe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zennie 0 #9 November 22, 2002 Did anyone read the picture caption? Quote Feb, 1999 -- Two skydivers jump from the tower of the Alex Fraser Bridge. The "sport" of BASE jumping, parachuting from stationary objects, is new in Vancouver. The acromym BASE stands for Buildings, Antennas, Spans (such as this bridge), and Earth. Apparently these reporters don't think too highly of our "sport". Guess they've never tried climbing an 1100 foot antenna with gear. - Z "Always be yourself... unless you suck." - Joss Whedon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smiles 0 #10 November 23, 2002 hey- sorry about the ft. instead of "floor"...Smiles Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smiles 0 #11 November 23, 2002 Vancouver Sun had to search their pics I suppose, for what they "own" or "paid for"... as if BASE was new to Vancouver in 1999.... Smiles Share this post Link to post Share on other sites