0
nicknitro71

Are you willing to fight for legal BASE in the US by going to the Supreme Court?

Recommended Posts

As a general rule, BASE jumping is legal in the U.S.

It's specifically prohibited in a few places (for example, in National Parks) and from a few specific objects (for example there is a specific ordinance prohibiting parachuting from a well known span in Northern California), but that's it.

So, as long as you don't commit a real crime (trespass or reckless endangerment, for example), there is no reason not to parachute from whatever you like (and/or whatever you can gain the permission of the owner to jump from).

That said, would I be willing to pursue a legal battle in a specific arena (like the National Park System) to the Supreme Court? Sure, given sufficient financial resources to do so. The truth is, I doubt we'd win that case on it's merits. Precedent is pretty clear that the NPS may disallow particular activities on their land (see snowmobiling in Yellowstone, for example). We might have an argument that the clear public interest (preserving the parks) is not incompatible with our use (parachuting), but I think it's probably a long shot.

However, the real battle is probably not to be had in court, but in the electorate. All it will take is one sympathetic President (or presidential appointee at the head of the NPS), and the policy will change. I bet we could even do it with one sympathetic Senator (see Slade Gorton and the the NPS about-face on the climbing fixed anchor ban).

Will it happen in my lifetime? I kind of doubt it. But we can always dream...
-- Tom Aiello

Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0