0
panavision

sub 250 feet area: flik 293v-tech/covers vs. fox285v-tech/covers

Recommended Posts

anyone have some info how this two canopy work in the low land area ( sub 250 feet )?
which works better in inflation, heading, pressurization and flight control?
any info-advice are very appreciated.
thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you might want to ask the aussies;)

Stay safe
Stefan Faber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have made several freefalls from 250' with my FOX 285 V-tecs with covers and a BR 48" ZP PC. With no PC hesitation and primed velcro looking at about 5 sec. canopy ride. I haven't jumped my Flik 293 V-tec with covers from anything lower than 350'. I really can't see a problem though. Why haven't I jumped my Flik on the low stuff? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." ;)
"When it comes to BASE, I'll never give advice, only my opinion"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I have made several freefalls from 250' with my FOX 285 V-tecs with covers and a BR 48" ZP PC. With no PC hesitation and primed velcro looking at about 5 sec. canopy ride.



What delay are you doing from this? 5 secs sounds very short for this config / jump......... is the canopy time videod?

I only ask as I was getting 5 sec canopy rides from 220ft freefalls with 46" and 42" PC's and unvented canopy (266) and velcro container with 1 / 1.5 sec delays......

sorry just me being curious...............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, I just dug out the video and timed the canopy ride. It was a little over 7 sec. canopy ride with a one sec. delay. Never timed it before. My bust. :|
"When it comes to BASE, I'll never give advice, only my opinion"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For me it would come down to landing area. Generally when I jump a B where there is a lot of landing hazards I choose my Fox over my FLiK as it is easier to sink and is a little slower. If the landing area is reasonably clear I will go the FLiK for its better glide and flare.

Both canopies work fine regarding inflation, heading and pressurisation. The fact the FLiK is a lighter canopy for its size lends me to choose it over the Fox for low FF’s if the landing area allows it. The landing area is normally my primary concern as this is where most injuries tend to occur.

Jason Fitz-Herbert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sorry dude I was not trying to be picky - I just thought 5 secs was short.

Time has a way of distorting for some reason in BASE!! :P

I like to calculate exactly canopy flight times to help me determine opening heights and delays etc - its just me being a tad too anal I guess!

apologies...............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sure the aussie. May be that Tom and others experienced jumpers could know something.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have vented fox 285 w/ v-tech covers. Below 250 I've had great results. The wing is very consistent in the way it pressurizes and flies; including heading performance. It's also equiped with a multi.
-Bryan

I love base like a fat kid loves cake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The fact the FLiK is a lighter canopy for its size lends me to choose it over the Fox for low FF’s if the landing area allows it.



Because extraction will be faster with the lighter canopy, or is inflation faster too? Is it simply the Fox's lower aspect ratio that allows it to sink better than a 4-line Flik?

Will

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0