TomAiello 26 #1 March 22, 2006 All, With the recent discussions of pedophilia, I think we all need to take a moment and review the Forum Rules. In particular, notice that the second forum rule (there are only four) is as follows: QuoteNo jokes about or references to pedophilia. None. Also, please read the explanation given a bit further down that page: QuoteReferences to pedophilia can only be made in a factual context or in discussion of certain political and social issues. Outside of those limited contexts Dropzone.com will have a zero-tolerance policy to pedophilia and any reference thereto will be removed without explanation. This means that discussions of actual, specific actions or real situations is permissible, but generalized jokes about pedophilia (and in many cases specific jokes about real situations) are not permitted. Feel free to express your opinion about real situations, or to discuss the legal, moral, or ethical ramifications of them. Please refrain from turning them into jokes, or posting short jests that add nothing new to tthe conversation. I have edited a couple of posts that contained these sorts of things. If you see a specific post that offends you, please PM me and point it out, and I'll have a look. Please consider this your warning on the subject. Henceforth, I will begin banning (with no additional warning) posters of pedophilia jokes. Thanks!-- Tom Aiello Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com SnakeRiverBASE.com Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sabre210 0 #2 March 27, 2006 What about child-killing Tom? Would that be fair game? ian Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skreamer 1 #3 March 27, 2006 Only vegans, killing vegans is OK. Memo to Tom : Remember to lock stickies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RPetrie 0 #4 April 1, 2006 You have got to be kidding me. Why in the hell would a forum on skydiving and other related activities have a rule specifying the intolerance for discussions related to pedophilia, or atleast jokes about the subject? Doesn't that seem kind of weird. Maybe this is a joke and I'm missing something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob.dino 1 #5 April 3, 2006 It's because Sangiro owns the site and he wants it that way. Nothing more complex than that... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spider22 0 #6 April 3, 2006 It's because this site is filled with dickheads that would joke about that kind of thing... .-|-.Kaint.-|-. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RhondaLea 4 #7 April 10, 2006 I'm pretty sure that if you go to google and put in the right search terms, some of the hits will lead to this site. What would be bad is if the "wrong" search terms (references to pedophilia) led to this site...especially if those being led to this site were LEOs hunting pedophiles. The next thing you know, someone has a warrant and Sangiro is getting a late-night knock at the door. Okay, maybe not a knock. Something about "not meeting trouble halfway" comes to mind. rlIf you don't know where you're going, you should know where you came from. Gullah Proverb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sabre210 0 #8 April 11, 2006 Rhonda I so wholeheartedly disagree with your reasoning here, but due to my newfound spirit of mutual respect and non confrontation i will refrain from labouring the point any further. peace ian Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RhondaLea 4 #9 April 11, 2006 QuoteRhonda I so wholeheartedly disagree with your reasoning here, but due to my newfound spirit of mutual respect and non confrontation i will refrain from labouring the point any further. peace ian Well, according to what I've been told, the actual reason here is to set a minimum standard of discourse. Nonetheless, there are many other websites with the same rule, and the reason is what I cited above. rlIf you don't know where you're going, you should know where you came from. Gullah Proverb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sabre210 0 #10 April 11, 2006 ****sounds of tongue being chewed off**** Okay. edited to add : that would be an adult tongue, not an infant's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites