Recommended Posts
stitch 0
"I don't think I like the sound of that" ~ MB65
Don't be a "Racer Hater"
Calvin19 0
-SPACE-
crwper 7
also, on a high speed water impact, a helmet increases the projected impact area of a head. therefor, making it decelerate faster than if it had no helmet on. but that might be the only safety argument against a helmet.
Following my brother's accident at the bridge earlier this year, in which he landed on his back in the water, one of the things that surprised us was that there was absolutely no damage to his helmet. I'm not sure if we would have recognized the symptoms of whiplash, but there was no damage whatsoever to his head and neck, either.
other than weight and whiplash on a deep slideroff opening.
Several years ago, 587 and I were jumping a low span. In the search for better head protection, he tried a motorcycle helmet. On that object we were hitting the ground pretty hard, and on impact his head kept moving because of the momentum of the helmet. His neck was quite sore for a few days.
Still, I think that's a good reason to jump fairly lightweight helmets, rather than jump without.
Michael
Calvin19 0
one of the things that surprised us was that there was absolutely no damage to his helmet.
well, yeah. i mean, how damaged would a helmet be from a terminal or faster water impact? the helmet is damaged by a single point impact where the helmet slows the head down quickly and spreads the force on head throughout the helmet. on a water impact, the helmet hits the water and has almost equal force over the projected area of the helmet, making it almost useless for a water impact.
I was wearing HanWags. one month old ones. and i will limp for the rest of my life. I had such an injury that had i NOT been wearing hanwags, i would have had a much less life-altering leg injury. The boots kept the bones inside my skin. thats it.
That I have a hard time to believe.
Care to give us more details?
Calvin19 0
thats incorrect.
the POINT of a back protector is to lessen the cahance of a back breaking lengthwise, and a small bit of puncture type protection.
The ONLY job a helmet does is lessen the deceleration of the head. not keep it in its correct place.
think about shit before you post it.
-SPACE-
Calvin19 0
I was wearing HanWags. one month old ones. and i will limp for the rest of my life. I had such an injury that had i NOT been wearing hanwags, i would have had a much less life-altering leg injury. The boots kept the bones inside my skin. thats it.
That I have a hard time to believe.
Care to give us more details?
i have explained my doctors and my thoughts on this a lot on dorkzone, the reason it is again under conversation in this thread amazes me.
-SPACE-
abby 0
crwper 7
well, yeah. i mean, how damaged would a helmet be from a terminal or faster water impact?
I don't actually know enough about the dynamics of water impacts to say. I've heard a lot of people say that hitting water at that speed is like hitting concrete, but I have a feeling those people are exaggerating the point somewhat. You may well be right.
One other thing that comes to mind regarding helmets is unusual, but perhaps worth metioning. When I got to Jason about 15 seconds after he had hit, he was lying face-up in about a foot of water. He had never lost consciousness, but was in very rough shape. His head was being kept afloat by the foam in his helmet. Had this not been the case, I really don't think he would have been able to keep his own head above water. It's not the sort of thing you plan for, but I would say it's at least as important as the increase in projected area. Although there are a lot better reasons to get a helmet with proper crush material (as opposed to a shell with a thin padded lining), I've added this one to my own mental list.
Michael
460 0
I was recommended “Factory Diver”. What are yalls opinion on this? Shall I just say fuckit and build my own line of helmets?
Let me know because I feel like crap for not wearing a helmet on any jumps.
Thanks in advance,
space
I find these helmets to be ideal for tracking...
Chris
To me (of course my opinion), it seems FUCKING STUPID!!!!
Newsflash,.. ..... BASE jumping in general is stupid! So who gives a fuck if people jump without!??! I jump with on every jump, I also wear a decent layer of armour because that's what "I" choose to do.
It has been said plenty ............. personal choice, nothing more. Now go be stupid!SabreDave
hookitt 1
There seems to be plenty of good reasons to wear a helmet. Besides personal choice, has anyone come up with a good reason not to wear a helmet?
There seems to be plenty of good reasons to not BASE with or without a helmet.
Aside from persoanl choice has anyone come up with a good reason to jump off shit??
bmsbase 0
one less thing to lose.
one less thing to put in the wrong place.
one less thing to put on at the exit.
one less thing to put in the stash bag after.
thats five less thoughts ...
you feel more free on the jump itself.
I do use helmet on 99% of my jumps aslong whith my kneepads..
but i do understand why people want to experience the no helmet jump.
Its about calculating the risk,is it worth it? then do it,if not wear a helmet..
Stay safe
Stefan Faber
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites