Calvin19 0 #1 December 5, 2014 http://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/orion-spaceship-goes-long-during-first-test-road-mars-n262146 It's about time NASA. But doing well! YEAH!!! -SPACE- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 806 #2 December 5, 2014 Yet we sky jumpers stress over losing one of our canopies. Sheesh! What a beautiful mission that was! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GeorgiaDon 362 #3 December 5, 2014 Very excellent! Did you get to watch the launch? Don_____________________________________ Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996) “Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pchapman 279 #4 December 5, 2014 Yay, American space stuff not blowing up! Although I realize the lay person doesn't hear about the successes, only the failures. From looking at a few news reports, most don't follow through on the meaning of the height flown to, or the peak velocity, and so miss the important point that it partially simulates a return from far away and not just a low orbit re-entry. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #5 December 5, 2014 I was riveted to the dead NASA TV feed. But followed it. It was a pretty neat thing. My thoughts? We should go to the moon again first. It's been over 40 years and we've lost the institutional knowledge of how to do it. And now we have someone else who wants to do it - China. So some inducement is available. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,501 #6 December 6, 2014 lawrocket My thoughts? We should go to the moon again first. It's been over 40 years and we've lost the institutional knowledge of how to do it. http://xkcd.com/1456/Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pchapman 279 #7 December 7, 2014 If we're doing xkcd then I have to counter with http://xkcd.com/984/ (And I guess that qualifies for Godwin's law...) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Calvin19 0 #8 December 8, 2014 pchapman If we're doing xkcd then I have to counter with http://xkcd.com/984/ (And I guess that qualifies for Godwin's law...) one of my favorites. and I -LOVE- the xkcd low-bit drawing of Saturn V in that comic. but my favorite xkcd is HANDS DOWN (and a shout-out to all the other rocket nerds here ) I have the full-size poster framed on my wall of this one: http://xkcd.com/1133/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,009 #9 December 11, 2014 Will be an interesting competition between Orion and the Dragon. The soft-landing capability of the Dragon is pretty cool, and they have seven flights with it so far. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Calvin19 0 #10 December 12, 2014 billvonWill be an interesting competition between Orion and the Dragon. The soft-landing capability of the Dragon is pretty cool, and they have seven flights with it so far. They're the only ones trying to re-use. Until someone else tries and fails, SpaceX is at #1 on the list. Granted, the cost will STILL be very high until the infrastructure is in place to re-use. But damn... Orion did awesome last week. If spaceX can stick this one, it will save 2014 for space flight. -SPACE- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #11 December 13, 2014 billvonWill be an interesting competition between Orion and the Dragon. The soft-landing capability of the Dragon is pretty cool, and they have seven flights with it so far. I don't think Orion and Dragon are competing. Orion is to be used for exploration and travel outside of low earth orbit. I don't think anybody is working on a competing airframe. Dragon is designed to take stuff to the ISS and back. There are competitors with SpaceX to see who gets to do the space truckin'. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,009 #12 December 15, 2014 >Orion is to be used for exploration and travel outside of low earth orbit. I don't think >anybody is working on a competing airframe. >Dragon is designed to take stuff to the ISS and back. There are competitors with >SpaceX to see who gets to do the space truckin'. I think the primary goal for both (ability to launch and land humans) will render them competitive no matter what. Remember that one of Musk's goals is Mars exploration, and the Red Dragon variant of the Dragon is specifically intended to land on Mars (and to be able to transport humans there.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #13 December 15, 2014 Well stated. I, myself, would like to see them kept separate. One size doesn't really fit all. We are learning that again and again. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites