ryoder 1,590 #1 July 22, 2014 Looks like more custom parts than production parts. http://jalopnik.com/amazing-loon-built-a-radial-engine-from-vw-parts-1608661285"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewGuy2005 53 #2 July 22, 2014 That's awesome. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GD64 1 #3 July 22, 2014 ryoder.......you sure come up with stuff I love the old radials....oil leaks and all. In the top bike show at Sturgis 1999 ish a guy built an awesome show bike using an aircraft radial (don't remember which aircraft). Practical not, unless your followed by a fueling truck, but hey, it's a show bike. IMO small tanks look better, however stopping every 100 miles or less is why I mostly ride solo. I think Jesse James built a radial also, years after the Sturgis bike (not built by him). I can really appreciate "out of the box" builds like this VW radial.......mentally twisted in a good way. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dpreguy 14 #4 July 24, 2014 I never have figured out why a radial engine has to have an odd number of cylinders. Seems like the crank would be in the same advantageous pushing position at the time of combustion just as well with an even number. (I suppose it the spark timing was off they could be opposed - not good) ...but if the timing was good...why not an even number? There must be a reason. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #5 July 24, 2014 dpreguyI never have figured out why a radial engine has to have an odd number of cylinders. Seems like the crank would be in the same advantageous pushing position at the time of combustion just as well with an even number. (I suppose it the spark timing was off they could be opposed - not good) ...but if the timing was good...why not an even number? There must be a reason. I was curious, so I searched and found this: Four-stroke radials have an odd number of cylinders per row, so that a consistent every-other-piston firing order can be maintained, providing smooth operation. For example, on a five-cylinder engine the firing order is 1, 3, 5, 2, 4 and back to cylinder 1. Moreover, this always leaves a one-piston gap between the piston on its combustion stroke and the piston on compression. The active stroke directly helps compressing the next cylinder to fire, so making the motion more uniform. If an even number of cylinders was used, the equally timed firing cycle would not be feasible.[1] The prototype radial Zoche aero-diesels (below) have an even number of cylinders, either four or eight; but this is not problematic, because they are two-stroke engines, with twice the number of power strokes as a four-stroke engine. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radial_engine"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites