skyjumpenfool 2 #1 February 25, 2013 New song from the Oscars. http://fansided.com/2013/02/24/seth-macfarlane-we-saw-your-boobs-video/Birdshit & Fools Productions "Son, only two things fall from the sky." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
promise5 17 #2 February 25, 2013 Nope, mine were covered No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CSpenceFLY 1 #3 February 25, 2013 Video removed. Youtube sucks these days. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
efs4ever 3 #4 February 25, 2013 Video removed.. Hah. It will be viral soon.Russell M. Webb D 7014 Attorney at Law 713 385 5676 https://www.tdcparole.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #5 February 25, 2013 QuoteVideo removed. Youtube sucks these days. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TWLKP8j0zk"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #6 February 25, 2013 Quote Nope, mine were covered We need pics...just to be sure."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldwomanc6 54 #7 February 25, 2013 The best part was when they showed live shots during tha song. Those whose bare boobs were mentioned, invariably blushed, looked down, or covered their face. If you have the nerve to do it on film, you can't recant Boobs, so at least don't look ashamed after the fact. lisa WSCR 594 FB 1023 CBDB 9 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squeak 17 #8 February 25, 2013 Quote The best part was when they showed live shots during tha song. Those whose bare boobs were mentioned, invariably blushed, looked down, or covered their face. If you have the nerve to do it on film, you can't recant Boobs, so at least don't look ashamed after the fact. YUP None of them looked impressedYou are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky) My Life ROCKS! How's yours doing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
promise5 17 #9 February 25, 2013 Quote The best part was when they showed live shots during tha song. Those whose bare boobs were mentioned, invariably blushed, looked down, or covered their face. If you have the nerve to do it on film, you can't recant Boobs, so at least don't look ashamed after the fact. lol I thought that was staged. Makes it funnier that it wasn'tNo matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigMikeH77 0 #10 February 25, 2013 What a funny, lighthearted song... Thanks for sharing Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CSpenceFLY 1 #11 February 25, 2013 QuoteQuoteVideo removed. Youtube sucks these days. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TWLKP8j0zk That one chick didn't look too happy. Any bets on how long it takes someone to put all of those video clips together to that song? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airtwardo 7 #12 February 25, 2013 Ummm...it was part of an 'act' of sort. Shatter who lives in the future, was telling Seth how horribly wrong the Oscars 'went' in 2013...and had copied that from the broadcast to show him what NOT to do in order to save the production. ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymama 37 #13 February 25, 2013 Yeah, I agree. The ladies were "acting" their embarrassment. Funny song, though!She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man, because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyjumpenfool 2 #14 February 25, 2013 Quote Any bets on how long it takes someone to put all of those video clips together to that song? I'm on it!! Birdshit & Fools Productions "Son, only two things fall from the sky." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #15 February 25, 2013 Quote Quote Quote Video removed. Youtube sucks these days. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TWLKP8j0zk That one chick didn't look too happy. That was Charlize Theron. "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyjumpenfool 2 #16 February 25, 2013 Quote Yeah, I agree. The ladies were "acting" their embarrassment. Funny song, though! True! But did you catch this guy when they broke away to Naomi Watts? He's trying to get another peek!!! Birdshit & Fools Productions "Son, only two things fall from the sky." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #17 February 26, 2013 Quote New song from the Oscars.http://fansided.com/2013/02/24/seth-macfarlane-we-saw-your-boobs-video/ Nope not mine... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davjohns 1 #18 February 26, 2013 That was hysterical. I was surprised Seth could sing that well. Personally, I lose respect for an actress when she shows her breasts. It's not necessary for any plot. Hard to take you seriously as an actress after that.I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squeak 17 #19 February 26, 2013 Quote That was hysterical. I was surprised Seth could sing that well. Personally, I lose respect for an actress when she shows her breasts. It's not necessary for any plot. Hard to take you seriously as an actress after that. well now isn't that something all should be concerned about, Your "moral high ground", which is tainted by the hypocritical attitude you show here in many of your posts.Self righteous Mofo You are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky) My Life ROCKS! How's yours doing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davjohns 1 #20 February 26, 2013 Hmmm...I TRY to not be hypocritical. If you point out evidence that I have been, I'm certainly open to it. I'm as fallible as anyone and more than many. I just don't see that breasts add to the credibility of an actress's talent. If it was necessary to show flesh to prove one's committment or talent, why haven't we seen penises on the big screen? Why are we limited to breasts? Shouldn't vaginas be showing up larger than life? Surely that proves an actress has real talent, right? Why aren't the older or less attractive actresses flashing their headlights? If it is necessary to the plot when the breasts are young and perky, why not add to the plot of Grumpy Old Men and show a few pair that are 'past their prime'? Obviously, I am just as fond of breasts as the next guy...quite possibly more. And I enjoy the occasional sexual joke and such. I just don't think a serious actress adds to her credit with this move.I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #21 February 26, 2013 QuoteThat was hysterical. I was surprised Seth could sing that well. Personally, I lose respect for an actress when she shows her breasts. It's not necessary for any plot. Hard to take you seriously as an actress after that. Ha! Madonna/Whore complex much?"I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rifleman 70 #22 February 26, 2013 Quote I just don't see that breasts add to the credibility of an actress's talent. If it was necessary to show flesh to prove one's committment or talent, why haven't we seen penises on the big screen? Why are we limited to breasts? Shouldn't vaginas be showing up larger than life? Surely that proves an actress has real talent, right? Why aren't the older or less attractive actresses flashing their headlights? If it is necessary to the plot when the breasts are young and perky, why not add to the plot of Grumpy Old Men and show a few pair that are 'past their prime'? Obviously, I am just as fond of breasts as the next guy...quite possibly more. And I enjoy the occasional sexual joke and such. I just don't think a serious actress adds to her credit with this move. Two words - Helen MirrenAtheism is a Non-Prophet Organisation Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davjohns 1 #23 February 26, 2013 Had to look her up. Still don't know her. Are you saying her career is considered more prestigious because she has shown her breasts or you want to see her breasts despite her age?I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nataly 38 #24 February 26, 2013 QuoteHmmm...I TRY to not be hypocritical. If you point out evidence that I have been, I'm certainly open to it. I'm as fallible as anyone and more than many. I just don't see that breasts add to the credibility of an actress's talent. If it was necessary to show flesh to prove one's committment or talent, why haven't we seen penises on the big screen? Why are we limited to breasts? Shouldn't vaginas be showing up larger than life? Surely that proves an actress has real talent, right? Why aren't the older or less attractive actresses flashing their headlights? If it is necessary to the plot when the breasts are young and perky, why not add to the plot of Grumpy Old Men and show a few pair that are 'past their prime'? Obviously, I am just as fond of breasts as the next guy...quite possibly more. And I enjoy the occasional sexual joke and such. I just don't think a serious actress adds to her credit with this move. If it adds nothing to the credibility of the actress' talent, why would it remove her credibility???"There is no problem so bad you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield « Sors le martinet et flagelle toi indigne contrôleuse de gestion. » - my boss Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davjohns 1 #25 February 26, 2013 Fair question. Because it is gratuitous. It is done just for the flash of seeing her breasts. I remember when Halle Berry went topless in Swordfish. The stir was about how much she demanded to do it. At that point, it's almost like prostitution, isn't it? I've seen the movie. Her breasts were completely unnecessary to the plot. I'm not complaining...they were nice. I'm just saying they did not add to her talent, but the fact that it cost extra is indicative of what it was really about. Think of it this way...would Hamlet be enhanced from an artistic standpoint if the fights involved more graphic violence with blood spurting everywhere? I don't think so. It would just be for shock value...gratuitous. I would have less respect for the actors who were part of that. Please understand that I am not saying their work doesn't have value. I like action movies. Let's face it...not the height of acting art, is it? I was really fond of Ann Hathaway in skin tight leather on a motorcycle in the latest Dark Knight. But that wasn't about acting talent, was it? I just think that once you show your breasts, you are indicating that you are not shooting for the artistic pinnacle of the trade.I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
