bluiev 0 #1 November 18, 2011 http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/17/travel/britain-passengers-cash/?hpt=wo_bn6 The charter plane actually forced the passengers to pay more money during a leg of the flight from India to London. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
david3 0 #2 November 19, 2011 Nice. Put out or get out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #3 November 20, 2011 Quotehttp://www.cnn.com/2011/11/17/travel/britain-passengers-cash/?hpt=wo_bn6 The charter plane actually forced the passengers to pay more money during a leg of the flight from India to London.The airline is actually experiencing financial problems. The passengers were asked to pay for the fuel for the Vienna-London leg of their flight (of what was on the news here). It is not the first time this happens, and not the last time either.scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldwomanc6 60 #4 November 20, 2011 Quote Quote http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/17/travel/britain-passengers-cash/?hpt=wo_bn6 The charter plane actually forced the passengers to pay more money during a leg of the flight from India to London. The airline is actually experiencing financial problems. The passengers were asked to pay for the fuel for the Vienna-London leg of their flight (of what was on the news here). It is not the first time this happens, and not the last time either. Still sounds like extortion to me lisa WSCR 594 FB 1023 CBDB 9 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Elite_Marksman 0 #5 November 20, 2011 Didn't they already pay for the fuel when they bought the ticket? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muff528 3 #6 November 20, 2011 "Et tu, Charlie?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #7 November 20, 2011 QuoteDidn't they already pay for the fuel when they bought the ticket?not saying if it is wrong or right. Just that is what happens when companies live on credit, and that the providers want to get paid. Not the first, not the last.scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diablopilot 2 #8 November 21, 2011 The tickets were bought through a UK agent who hired a now out of business UK booking company to charter the planes which were operated by a third company and owned by a 4th in Spain. I believe the third and 4th companies failed to receive payment and the fuel was not going to be put on the aircraft in India by a 5th company till THEIR payment was guarenteed.---------------------------------------------- You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldwomanc6 60 #9 November 21, 2011 QuoteThe tickets were bought through a UK agent who hired a now out of business UK booking company to charter the planes which were operated by a third company and owned by a 4th in Spain. I believe the third and 4th companies failed to receive payment and the fuel was not going to be put on the aircraft in India by a 5th company till THEIR payment was guarenteed. That may be, but once the contracted passengers are on on board, they should not be asked to ante up. If the tickets were worth the boarding, they are worth the trip. The companies involved should work that out amongst themselves. If the airline is unable to safely convey the passengers to their destination, then they should deplane and be given a refund. Unless there is gunfire on the airport, I would say "efffffffff you" on principal. I should be careful, though, I joke and it comes true--YIKES.lisa WSCR 594 FB 1023 CBDB 9 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #10 November 21, 2011 QuoteI believe the third and 4th companies failed to receive payment and the fuel was not going to be put on the aircraft in India by a 5th company till THEIR payment was guarenteed. In the end, the Indian fuel farm was the only business that ran like a business. It's the airlines fault for reserving the seats for the booking company without collecting payment. I can't call the airline a reserve seats without payment, so neither should they. Maybe the airline could extend them a 'grace period', where they reserve them seats without payment up until 30 days before the flight, and then require payment to hold the seats. This allows the booking company to collect payment, and not have to 'front' the cost of the seats. Any unsold seats at that time could go back on the regular market. Also, if the booking company defaults on payments, it allows passengers who booked with them to be notified and seek a resolution before they're sitting the plane reaching for their wallet. I get running on credit, and booking services and travel agencies and the like, but there's no excuse for letting a problem go so long that they have to put the passengers in that position. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites