0
Ron

Question on legalized pot

Recommended Posts

Quote

But if that driver wants to smoke a little weed when he is at home why should anyone have the right to tell him what he can or can't do.


The biggest problem is determining the mental affect of marijuana based on current testing involving urine or hair. I don't think anybody truly believes that having trace TCH in your hair follicles affects your mental state. It is the THC that is in the cellular membranes of the brain that has a mental affect and testing that would be highly invasive. Maybe the amount of THC in saliva has a more direct correlation with the amount of THC in the brain. I wish there were a test that indicates how 'high' someone really is, but there isn't.
For the same reason I jump off a perfectly good diving board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That is the key to libertarian philosophy.

"You have all the freedoms in the world, but your freedoms end at my nose."



What post are you referring to?

Everyone has the right to do as they please as long as it is in there own home. If you want or have the need to be told what to do or not to do then get a damn wife. I am sure you can find one who will tell you what and when to do anything 24/7. ;)
TPM Sister#130ONTIG#1
I love vodka.I love vodka cause it rhymes with Tuaca~LisaH
You having a clean thought is like billyvance having a clean post.iluvtofly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I wish there were a test that indicates how 'high' someone really is, but there isn't.



That's the biggest hurdle involved with medical MJ, or legal/recreational MJ if that comes to pass, IMO. A breathalizer gives a fairly accurate representation of how "drunk" someone is (although this varies a lot between individuals) so making laws based on blood alcohol levels makes sense because the laws are essentially based on a person's intoxication level.

There doesn't seem to be an accurate test to determine how "high" someone is since THC can stay in their body for days, weeks, etc. depending on the argument and testing method. Perhaps all the changes in medical MJ laws will lead to more research and development into better testing methods. Until that happens though, it's theoretically possible for someone to loose their job because the stood next to a stoner at a party the weekend before.:S


"Ignorance is bliss" and "Patience is a virtue"... So if you're stupid and don't mind waiting around for a while, I guess you can have a pretty good life!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Good thing politicians don't make such decisions while drinking then.
[:/]



But that would certainly explain a lot of their decisions.:S
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having spent time in DC working for a major telco's Law and Government Affairs division (the lobbying division ;)) I was amazed at what sort of "events" they hosted for politicians in order to gain votes.

Sure did appreciate the secure underground parking in the winter though. All those poor peons trekking across those HUGE parking lots.
:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agreed!

Different people have different thresholds before they act "drunk."

Back in my "drunken sailor" days, I drove home drunk hundreds of times. Even had conversations with three cops, none of whom asked if I was drunk!

Like a buddy once told me: "Rob can walk a straight line when he is drunk, just don't ask him to carry on a conversation!"

Similarly, a cousin (who retired from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police as a Staff Sargeant) told me about breathalizer training at the Canadian Airborne Regiment's Sargeant's Mess. "Some of those old sargent-majors could really hold their liquor. They could walk a straight line, but blow three times the legal limit!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That is the key to libertarian philosophy.

"You have all the freedoms in the world, but your freedoms end at my nose."



That's how I feel about it. You can do as you please till it impacts another person.

I have always wondered about the legal/Employee issue in CA, but never cared enough to ask someone. Then I saw the Miami paper said that FL is working on it.... Heck, I say legalize it and tax it.

BTW, I don't smoke pot... But think as long as it does not hurt anyone else..... Do as you please is my opinion.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well, here in Wisconsin there was a case over pre-employment testing for nicotine.

Companies didn't want to hire smokers (cigarette) due to the demonstrated higher health care costs, higher absenteeism and that sort of thing.

IIRC, it went to court and was decided (basically) that the employer couldn't discriminate against an employee engaging in conduct that was legal.

They can (and do) charge more for health insurance, but they can't fire or refuse to hire them.

http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/LEPG05_Smoke_Fired.pdf

The smoking part is down a few pages.

I don't know how this will play out with pot, mainly because pot has been demonstrated to affect people for a day or two (or longer, I don't remember exactly). It will be interesting to watch.



somebody might wanna tell the MANY MANY fire departments that will not hire you if you have smoked with in the year of your hiring date. you have to sign an affadavit saying you have not smoked then also pass a nicotine test.


Quote


Are you talking about a hair test, urine, or blood. With hair you can test 6 months back or longer. All depends on the length of the hair. Urine is based on how much water you drink a day you can flush your system in 24 hours. However, if your urine is to clear they will reject the sample. Blood is usually 24-48 hours from what I am told. The quanity and length of time a person has smoked plays a large factor with all the test.



and if your test comes back "dilute" its automaticly classified as a positive result by most companies.
Thanatos340(on landing rounds)--
Landing procedure: Hand all the way up, Feet and Knees Together and PLF soon as you get bitch slapped by a planet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I can't believe this has not gone to SC yet.



Why?

1. Everyone seems to acting polite.
2. Smokin a dube seems more of a "bonfire" topic. :P
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I can't believe this has not gone to SC yet.



Why?

1. Everyone seems to acting polite.
2. Smokin a dube seems more of a "bonfire" topic. :P


Yeah - cuz it's a lot harder drug they be smokin' in SC!
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0