Recommended Posts
Quotestylin!!! i love getting laid ...i might just go get one of those go-stupids and hang it off my nuts like a disco ball whilst getting laid....would provide much more entertaining footage im sure
Don't do it...I don't wanna see ya 'Go In'!
~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~
QuoteQuotestylin!!! i love getting laid ...i might just go get one of those go-stupids and hang it off my nuts like a disco ball whilst getting laid....would provide much more entertaining footage im sure
Don't do it...I don't wanna see ya 'Go In'!
thats some bullshit!! why you cockblocking T ??
if you want a friend feed any animal
Perry Farrell
Perry Farrell
DSE 5
And yet another incident over the weekend involving a small format camera and a low time jumper.
Keep those stories comin' folks.
JimGoFast; I'm curious which instructors at your DZ are saying you're good with jumping a camera?
Keep those stories comin' folks.
JimGoFast; I'm curious which instructors at your DZ are saying you're good with jumping a camera?
Are you ruling out the fact that..
A: Shit does happen, and has always been happening to these jumpers in the 1-200 jump range regardless of a camera?
B: The camera played a direct role in what happened and would absolutely not have happened if the camera was not present?
Just because a teen gets in a car wreck does not mean a cell phone caused ALL the wrecks happening to teens because one just happened to be in the car at that time, teens have been getting in car wrecks for years.....BUT factors in some no argument there
I'm not pushing for anyone jumping a camera before 200. I just know you seem to be heading the torch and pitchfork mob. Just wondering how you are analyzing things and if you are padding the "incident list" because you feel so strongly about the subject.
Just don't want everyone who gets a stubbed toe, or anything that could have happened to anyone getting on your "camera list" when it would have happened to anyone regardless if a camera was strapped to their head or not.
I'm all for safety(part of my job in the fire service) and don't want to see ANYONE on ANY "list", so I agree with the cause, but would hate to see fake inflated reports.
Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,
A: Shit does happen, and has always been happening to these jumpers in the 1-200 jump range regardless of a camera?
B: The camera played a direct role in what happened and would absolutely not have happened if the camera was not present?
Just because a teen gets in a car wreck does not mean a cell phone caused ALL the wrecks happening to teens because one just happened to be in the car at that time, teens have been getting in car wrecks for years.....BUT factors in some no argument there
I'm not pushing for anyone jumping a camera before 200. I just know you seem to be heading the torch and pitchfork mob. Just wondering how you are analyzing things and if you are padding the "incident list" because you feel so strongly about the subject.
Just don't want everyone who gets a stubbed toe, or anything that could have happened to anyone getting on your "camera list" when it would have happened to anyone regardless if a camera was strapped to their head or not.
I'm all for safety(part of my job in the fire service) and don't want to see ANYONE on ANY "list", so I agree with the cause, but would hate to see fake inflated reports.
Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,
so like joe said whats the pros for disregarding a recommendation to have a bit of experience with your basic equipment before introducing other potential hazzards
that reads kinda lame too....im just saying
Perry Farrell
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites