Squeak 17 #1 October 24, 2008 VMware Fusion or Parallels Desktop Pros cons? i need to Run Macromedia Studio MX and it wont load onto the Mac Book. will either of these allow me to load the software?You are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky) My Life ROCKS! How's yours doing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 348 #2 October 24, 2008 I have been running VMware Fusion on two machines. Have not run Parallels, so cannot comment on it, but no issues at all with Fusion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyjumpsteve 0 #3 October 24, 2008 Me too. VMware on 2 desktops and 1 laptop. No issues at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murrays 0 #4 October 24, 2008 I have both on my work machine. I was forced to use Fusion when the tax program I was using on Parallels started crashing and nothing would work to fix it. Everything has worked fine under Fusion...everything being the one tax program I use -- Murray "No tyranny is so irksome as petty tyranny: the officious demands of policemen, government clerks, and electromechanical gadgets." - Edward Abbey Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pinkfairy 0 #5 October 24, 2008 Hi! I use and like VMWare Fusion, It's fast (I've got a pretty fast mac, that might have something to do with it), and I like the unity feature. VMWare is also a well known and big maker of virtualisation software for servers, so they have the experience. BUT: The programs you mention are pretty demanding, and just running a virtual machine uses up a lot of memory and CPU, so it isn't ideal. You will probably get better performance by running the mac versions, or even run the windows ones using windows installed on your mac using boot camp that comes for free with your Intel based mac. ( you only need a windows licence and install CD). I haven't tried this, for the reasons listed above, and because I have all the Adobe Licences I need for mac. I have no reason to believe that it wouldn't work at on a virtual machine. Adobe's activation keys are pretty straightforward with no linking to the mac adress of the network card or other weird stuff. I would see if Adobe's website had anything to say about it.Relax, you can die if you mess up, but it will probably not be by bullet. I'm a BIG, TOUGH BIGWAY FORMATION SKYDIVER! What are you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akjmpplt 0 #7 October 24, 2008 I use bootcamp on my Mac Pro to run Windows and Windows apps. No brainer installation...have encountered zero problems.SmugMug Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skiskyrock 0 #8 October 25, 2008 When I was trying to make the same decision I talked to a mac developer and his opinion was that fusion was a better technical solution, but had just come out while Parallels had been out longer and had most of the bugs worked out. I have three programs I need windows for, and most of the time I just reboot into windows using Bootcamp. If you just have the one program and your work flow allows, Bootcamp might be a good alternative, especially if performance is important. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperGirl 0 #9 October 27, 2008 I get better performance with vmware fusion than with parallels. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites