0
dannydan

I dont get it!

Recommended Posts

I seriously dont get what is going on or in that pic! I dont know about stich wether or not at trying to be sneaky, but I must be out of the loop on some things in life....

If this thread http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3134215;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;;page=unread#unread is locked
because of "sneakyness", and someone (esp a mod) is offended, why lock it? Just recycle....


I am not trying to be a smartbutt here, but just trying to understand what is tolerable and what is not? I see NOTHING in that pic that is offending! NOW if it is the future comments that has a mod worried, then I think I see a problem..

HELP ME OUT here so that I may understand better!

peace
:dd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you familiar with the two girls and a cup controversy?

Not saying I agree with the thread lock, but I didn't open the attachment at first because I thought it was a link leading to that. And I thought to myself, "Oh, brother, here we go..."

Perhaps the mod didn't open the attachment either...or feared that it would lead to the link being posted to the offensive material. (Which I haven't seen either).


			
		

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

I seriously dont get what is going on or in that pic! I dont know about stich wether or not at trying to be sneaky, but I must be out of the loop on some things in life....

If this thread http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3134215;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;;page=unread#unread is locked
because of "sneakyness", and someone (esp a mod) is offended, why lock it? Just recycle....


I am not trying to be a smartbutt here, but just trying to understand what is tolerable and what is not? I see NOTHING in that pic that is offending! NOW if it is the future comments that has a mod worried, then I think I see a problem..

HELP ME OUT here so that I may understand better!

peace
:dd



I would think that the mods are tired of just turfing shock value posts and not having anyone learn from them.

If it's locked and left up here, along with their comments about these type of posts, maybe SOMEONE will learn from it (since some folks probably aren't reading HH's stickies).
'Shell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

  Quote

Are you familiar with the two girls and a cup controversy?



NOPE!! This is why I think i am out of some lifes loops of the modern ages... I will ASSuME that 2grlz and one cup has something to do with SEX???



www.google.com is your friend if you really want to know (you will have to turn safe search off)

I'm certainly not a prude, but it really has no place here, particularly with HH's clearly expressed desire to 're civilize' the bonfire into something at least approaching relevant to skydiving.
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

LIke I said, I haven't seen it, but it is apparantly a repulsive video involving BM, two girls, and one cup.

Based upon other's disgust and outrage, I've managed to steer clear of seeing that one.



I haven't seen it either but like you said, I've heard it's really disgusting and references to it, with the chance of a link to the "real thing", really don't need to be up on this site.
'Shell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

I've managed to steer clear of seeing that one.



I thought I was the only one-I've also managed to miss all of the rash of famous folk sex vids-here's hoping it stays that way.

I'm guessing that there was concern that the thread would quickly degenerate. Personally, I was formulating a funny, non-offensive reply as it was locked.
You are only as strong as the prey you devour

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

i've never seen any of them either.



nor myself since my old puter box wont play YOUTUBES or skydiving movies etc etc...

And I understand now through all the latest posts in this thread that is a disgusting scene of whatever... Thats cool that QUADE thought enuf to do something about it, however..... If He never opened the pic (which does not show anything disgusting) and then locks it insteads of deleting and giving a warning to stitch, then why exactly do we have rules and the OPEN FORUMS thread??

There is talk about over in suggestions http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3118901;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;;page=unread#unread
about POSTING LIMITS per day...

Do we really need this to happen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've honestly have never seen it. Hell, I'm still haven't gotten over being forced to watch "Tub-Girl" at Z-Hillls a few years back. (token skydiving reference)

The thread you have started was actually the direction I was going for with the original thread. But lately it seems everything is taken at it's literal meaning.
"No cookies for you"- GFD
"I don't think I like the sound of that" ~ MB65
Don't be a "Racer Hater"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

Then you don't want them bad enough to truly appreciate someone bringing them to you-so no-won't do it



Whateveh!! I couldn't go to the store cause i had bleach in my hair...i'm not a natural blonde ya know...:P

___________________________________________
meow

I get a Mike hug! I get a Mike hug!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0