0
marinho

Riggers!

Recommended Posts

Quote

Air, Inspect, Repack.



actually (technically) Air, Inspect and Recertify....... (as airworthy) but you do have to pack it to make it airworthy so...... either will do
Pete Draper,

Just because my life plan is written on the back of a Hooter's Napkin, it's still a life plan.... right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Air, Inspect, Repack.



actually (technically) Air, Inspect and Recertify....... (as airworthy) but you do have to pack it to make it airworthy so...... either will do


Well actually, the rigger is not re-certifying the rig, the canopy or anything else. To do that would require drop tests and data collection to ensure that the system conforms to current or improved TSO standards. This is not the case. That would be the manufactures responsibility.
AIR stands for Air(as in air out) Inspect, and repack.
Kevin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Air, Inspect, Repack.



actually (technically) Air, Inspect and Recertify....... (as airworthy) but you do have to pack it to make it airworthy so...... either will do


Well actually, the rigger is not re-certifying the rig, the canopy or anything else. To do that would require drop tests and data collection to ensure that the system conforms to current or improved TSO standards. This is not the case. That would be the manufactures responsibility.
AIR stands for Air(as in air out) Inspect, and repack.
Kevin



I would agree with that if the 120 day period made previous testing invalid. certainly the design has not changed, it's just that the condition of the unit is in question.
Recertifying things is different from certifying them. Other industries are required to perform inspections and recertify items why should parachute be any different?

I like calling it recertifying, it demonstrates the weight of what the rigger is really doing.
I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Air, Inspect, Repack.



actually (technically) Air, Inspect and Recertify....... (as airworthy) but you do have to pack it to make it airworthy so...... either will do



There is nothing in the FAA reg. that mentions, "recertify" pertaining to an approved parachute. There is mention of airing, inspection and packing.

This may be something used in military rigging only.

I was always told that I&R were short for “Inspect and Repack”.
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What up GUS?

In my rigging world AIR should never be used...Yes I heard of Aeration Inspection and Repack but to me it means Assembly, Inspection, and Repack that does not make any sense :S

it's either A & P (Assembly and Pack) or I & R Inspection and Repack), those are the only two sets of initials I use.

The whole AIR gets really under my skin >:(
Memento Audere Semper

903

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The whole AIR gets really under my skin



Tell it to the FAA.

Quote

§ 65.129 Performance standards.

No certificated parachute rigger may—

(c) Pack a parachute that has not been thoroughly dried and aired;


My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would agree with that if the 120 day period made previous testing invalid. certainly the design has not changed, it's just that the condition of the unit is in question.
Recertifying things is different from certifying them. Other industries are required to perform inspections and recertify items why should parachute be any different?


I like calling it recertifying, it demonstrates the weight of what the rigger is really doing.



Call it what you want, but I believe the rule book says that every 120 days, parachutes must be inspected for defects, and repacked. Not re-certified.

Think about this way. A manufacture goes through great effort and expense to have their product certified to current TSO standards. Even after all of their testing, they attach a label that says something to the effect of, "even if this equipment has been properly packed and deployed, they still some times fail".

If after all that effort, the manufactures still say the system may fail, how in the world are you going to "certify" it will work as intended simply by performing an I&R?

As an experienced rigger, you should be able to look at what they (the manufacture) have built and say with some degree of certainty that a particular system will (based on your experience) probably work as designed, but are you really certifying anything other than the fact that you looked at it? I think not.

Your job as rigger is to inspect for damage and or dangerous manufacturing defects, repair or correct any damage or defect it if it's within the scope of your riggers certificate to do so, and repack it. Thats it.
Just my two cents.
K

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Air, Inspect, Repack.



actually (technically) Air, Inspect and Recertify....... (as airworthy) but you do have to pack it to make it airworthy so...... either will do



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Sorry Sid,
BUt we are going to have to disagree on the issue of re-certification. The last time I recertified a canopy was during the mid-1990s, when I tested a SAC for acid mesh, washed it, then re-tested it before returning it to service.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The old: "Air, Inspect and Repack" is reserved for water jumps or clumsy pond swoopers.




It is a carry over from when there were certified lofts and canopies were required to be hung for 24 hours before packing.

But as I posted before, the regs. still refers to drying and airing before packing.


§ 65.129 Performance standards.

No certificated parachute rigger may—

(c) Pack a parachute that has not been thoroughly dried and aired;

My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Tell it to the FAA.

Quote
§ 65.129 Performance standards.

No certificated parachute rigger may—

(c) Pack a parachute that has not been thoroughly dried and aired;



Could that be read to mean, since a rigger or the jumper that will use it or a person under the supervision of a rigger, that a wet main isn't meant to be packed?
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's kinda funny. I used the term 're-certify' on another, now defunct parachute related web-site and was told in so many words there was no such thing. It was pointed-out to me that, that term was not used by the FAA. I've heard Allen Silver state that riggers 're-certify' a parachute at more than one Symposium.[:/]:D


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0