Gene03 0 #51 February 28, 2007 Sooo... Do you think Napoleons' defeat at Waterloo would of had a different outcome is he had B-52's?“The only fool bigger than the person who knows it all is the person who argues with him. Stanislaw Jerzy Lec quotes (Polish writer, poet and satirist 1906-1966) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sunshine 2 #53 February 28, 2007 QuoteSooo... Do you think Napoleons' defeat at Waterloo would of had a different outcome is he had B-52's? The only thing that could've made a difference is twinkies. ___________________________________________ meow I get a Mike hug! I get a Mike hug! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #54 February 28, 2007 QuoteQuoteSooo... Do you think Napoleons' defeat at Waterloo would of had a different outcome is he had B-52's? The only thing that could've made a difference is twinkies. And housecats.Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MF42 0 #55 February 28, 2007 QuoteQuoteSooo... Do you think Napoleons' defeat at Waterloo would of had a different outcome is he had B-52's? The only thing that could've made a difference is twinkies. How about a waterslide? That could've worked. Matt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sunshine 2 #56 February 28, 2007 QuoteSooo... Do you think Napoleons' defeat at Waterloo would of had a different outcome is he had B-52's? --------------------------------------------------------- The only thing that could've made a difference is twinkies. ---------------------------------------------------------- How about a waterslide? That could've worked. Or a big bowl of ice cream ___________________________________________ meow I get a Mike hug! I get a Mike hug! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MF42 0 #57 February 28, 2007 QuoteQuoteSooo... Do you think Napoleons' defeat at Waterloo would of had a different outcome is he had B-52's? --------------------------------------------------------- The only thing that could've made a difference is twinkies. ---------------------------------------------------------- How about a waterslide? That could've worked. Or a big bowl of ice cream Ziggy Piggy! Matt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy_Copland 0 #58 February 28, 2007 Nope because at Waterloo we also had Germans fighting with us... Highly efficient soldiers and hate the French nearly as much as us Brits 1338 People aint made of nothin' but water and shit. Until morale improves, the beatings will continue. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #59 February 28, 2007 QuoteNope because at Waterloo we also had Germans fighting with us... Highly efficient soldiers and hate the French nearly as much as us Brits Who doesn't hate the French?Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GravityJunky 0 #60 February 28, 2007 QuoteQuoteSooo... Do you think Napoleons' defeat at Waterloo would of had a different outcome is he had B-52's?-------------- The only thing that could've made a difference is twinkies.------------- How about a waterslide? That could've worked. Or a big bowl of ice cream Ziggy Piggy! And some KY Jelly!*My Inner Child is A Fucking Prick Too! *Everyones entitled to be stupid but you are abusing the priviledge *Well I'd love to stay & chat, But youre a total Bitch! {Stewie} Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squeak 17 #61 February 28, 2007 QuoteQuoteNope because at Waterloo we also had Germans fighting with us... Highly efficient soldiers and hate the French nearly as much as us Brits Who doesn't hate the French? MEYou are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky) My Life ROCKS! How's yours doing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #62 March 1, 2007 I have one big gripe. I fucking hate the big shits at the Federal Reserve. Basically, I have had a checking account for 17 years with the same bank. Then my bank merged with another bank. But the fucking Federal Reserve decided they didn't like part of the deal, and made the two merging banks sell some of their assets to a third bank. This part only affects a certain area. Well guess what. Because my account was started in that area and the original bank branch where it started in, is being sold to the 3rd bank. Here's the kicker: I haven't lived in that area for 13 years, and I didn't know I could request that my account home be transferred from that branch to the branch office that I have used for the last 8 years. Well, too late to do that now. The fucking 3rd bank owns my account now. The REAL kicker is that this 3rd bank will NOT HAVE any goddamn branches within 90 miles of MY HOME. I have already received a new account number and a new ATM card from the 3rd bank, before I realized what was going on, and my account is set to transfer to the 3rd bank on March 8. I asked about closing my bank account and starting a new one with the merging unified bank. Nope. Federal law says I can't go back to that bank for one fucking year. Well that's just goddamn fucking bullshit. What the bloody fuck am I gonna do with a bank account when the nearest motherfucking branch is 90 miles away?!? Goddamn motherfucking Federal Reserve has a bunch of fucking idiots working there. The hell with them. I'm closing my account before the transfer occurs and getting a new account at a different bank in my town. FUCK them bitches. Nobody is gonna tell me who the fuck I can do business with. BITCHES!! Rant over."Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gene03 0 #63 March 1, 2007 That's not a rant. that is justifiable rage. Rock on dude.“The only fool bigger than the person who knows it all is the person who argues with him. Stanislaw Jerzy Lec quotes (Polish writer, poet and satirist 1906-1966) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #64 March 1, 2007 QuoteThat's not a rant. that is justifiable rage. Rock on dude. I got on the Federal Reserve website and sent a nasty "fuck you very much" email to those bastards. Not that it'll do me any good, but at least I got it off my shoulders. "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #65 March 1, 2007 Books that have the footnotes at the back end of the book, so you have to flip to the back to read them. They should be in small font at the bottom of the pages. "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MF42 0 #66 March 1, 2007 Agreed about the footnotes! Personally, I always view any footnotes as evidence of poor writing skills, or just plain laziness; the notes at the back of the book are the worst. Please, spend a little more time with the project, and figure out how to incorporate your point into the text. If the extra information is really so off-topic that it just won't fit into the current passage, then make a new paragraph somewhere else, or just leave it out altogether. How in the hell has such an unconscionably sloppy practice become acceptable?! Matt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pinkfairy 0 #67 March 1, 2007 Food being advertised as healthy when it's not. "contains whole grain" --> yeah, a small amount of whole grain, and the rest is just starch and sugar. "Low fat" -->yeah, compared with pure butter. "low fat" --> ...and a ton of sugar. "Sweetened with fructose" --> AND sugar. Mostly sugar, actually. Most american cereal is like that, one way or another. It's OK that they sell it, and some of them taste great, but they aren't really healthy. Some of them are like cake. There should be laws against this kind of marketing. I think "with whole grain" is the worst. You could just sprinkle a little whole grain flour on top of the chocolate cake and say it's "with whole grain". That must make carrot cake healthy, as carrot is a vegetable. And people should really learn maths. At least calculating with percentages. At least so they can read food labels. So they are not fooled when they try to buy healthy food. Oh, tip: if you want to buy something healthy, it doesn't usually taste like chocolate cake if it's really healthy. And fresh fruit and veg are always and has always been healthy. I must say, this is a great thread!Relax, you can die if you mess up, but it will probably not be by bullet. I'm a BIG, TOUGH BIGWAY FORMATION SKYDIVER! What are you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pinkfairy 0 #68 March 1, 2007 And websites that are set up with a DNS that only accepts you if you type www before the domain name. That annoys me!Relax, you can die if you mess up, but it will probably not be by bullet. I'm a BIG, TOUGH BIGWAY FORMATION SKYDIVER! What are you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Icon134 0 #69 March 1, 2007 QuoteAnd websites that are set up with a DNS that only accepts you if you type www before the domain name. That annoys me!ok, I just checked... my domain is fine... Livin' on the Edge... sleeping with my rigger's wife... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CSpenceFLY 1 #70 March 1, 2007 anal bleaching. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
