DSE 5
QuoteQuote
I started to say "T-shirt and shorts," instead of "T-shirt and jeans," but I decided to give your friend more credit than that. If he's riding around in shorts AT ANY SPEED, he's being careless.
Yahoos like your friend are the reason it costs something like $2,000 a year to insure a sport bike and the reason I can't buy health insurance that covers me when I ride.
Umm...I ride my bike in shorts, jeans, no helmet, sneakers, with sunglasses and my mp3 player virtually every day, and have ridden this way for nearly 30 years. I'm not at all responsible for you not being able to pay for your insurance; I have health insurance that covers me when I ride. I've had two incidents in 30 years; the first I hit a black dog in the middle of the night, I was wearing shorts and no shirt. Neither shorts nor no shirt contributed to the accident, and wearing jeans, shirt, or helmet wouldn't have changed the outcome. Second incident, I was hit by a guy running a red light. I was wearing jeans and a Tshirt, no helmet. Wearing anything else wouldn't have affected the outcome. Both cases offered a broken leg and in the second, a broken elbow and wrist. The people to blame are the morons that buy crotch rockets and ride too fast in their first 3 weeks of owning their bike, and aren't wearing helmets when they crack up. Riders like Ben Roethlisberger are your issue. Just like there are responsible skydivers, there are responsible motorcycle riders. Can I blame the cost of my insurance on hook-turning skydivers that misjudge altitude? Or should we all just quit having fun with our lives and wrap ourselves in bubble wrap?
Or maybe we should simply live our lives pointing the finger at everyone else for whatever goes wrong in our world.
If it costs you 2000.00 a year to insure a sport bike, either you have your own bad driving record or you have a very bad insurance carrier. My 25K bike costs me less than 500.00 per year, full coverage. My Valkyrie (around 14K) costs less than 300.00 per year, full coverage, and my dirt bike is very inexpensive to cover (liability only), but I have an excellent driving record, even as a "careless" motorcycle rider that has had at least 25 bikes in his lifetime, and laid down 2 of them. But, my mother no longer cuts my sandwiches for me either.
There are idiots on 2 wheels and there are idiots under canopy, and just because someone wears jeans on a motorcycle or doesn't have an AAD doesn't make them an idiot.
A. You edited my quote to make it appear I said something I didn't.
B. I'll respond to the rest of your unwarranted, overly defensive rant when you fix "A."
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks." --Hamlet (III, ii, 239)
I copied your post verbatim, then removed the line about the person with no license being foolish, because I agreed with you.
Not protesting too much at all; I resent the intimation that anyone that wears shorts on a motorcycle 'AT ANY SPEED' is "careless" or responsible for the cost of your insurance.
I don't wear sunscreen when I go outdoors; am I to blame for the high cost of health insurance due to the potential for skin cancer?
I started to say "T-shirt and shorts," instead of "T-shirt and jeans," but I decided to give your friend more credit than that. If he's riding around in shorts AT ANY SPEED, he's being careless.
Yahoos like your friend are the reason it costs something like $2,000 a year to insure a sport bike and the reason I can't buy health insurance that covers me when I ride.
Umm...I ride my bike in shorts, jeans, no helmet, sneakers, with sunglasses and my mp3 player virtually every day, and have ridden this way for nearly 30 years. I'm not at all responsible for you not being able to pay for your insurance; I have health insurance that covers me when I ride. I've had two incidents in 30 years; the first I hit a black dog in the middle of the night, I was wearing shorts and no shirt. Neither shorts nor no shirt contributed to the accident, and wearing jeans, shirt, or helmet wouldn't have changed the outcome. Second incident, I was hit by a guy running a red light. I was wearing jeans and a Tshirt, no helmet. Wearing anything else wouldn't have affected the outcome. Both cases offered a broken leg and in the second, a broken elbow and wrist. The people to blame are the morons that buy crotch rockets and ride too fast in their first 3 weeks of owning their bike, and aren't wearing helmets when they crack up. Riders like Ben Roethlisberger are your issue. Just like there are responsible skydivers, there are responsible motorcycle riders. Can I blame the cost of my insurance on hook-turning skydivers that misjudge altitude? Or should we all just quit having fun with our lives and wrap ourselves in bubble wrap?
Or maybe we should simply live our lives pointing the finger at everyone else for whatever goes wrong in our world.
If it costs you 2000.00 a year to insure a sport bike, either you have your own bad driving record or you have a very bad insurance carrier. My 25K bike costs me less than 500.00 per year, full coverage. My Valkyrie (around 14K) costs less than 300.00 per year, full coverage, and my dirt bike is very inexpensive to cover (liability only), but I have an excellent driving record, even as a "careless" motorcycle rider that has had at least 25 bikes in his lifetime, and laid down 2 of them. But, my mother no longer cuts my sandwiches for me either.
There are idiots on 2 wheels and there are idiots under canopy, and just because someone wears jeans on a motorcycle or doesn't have an AAD doesn't make them an idiot.
A. You edited my quote to make it appear I said something I didn't.
B. I'll respond to the rest of your unwarranted, overly defensive rant when you fix "A."
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks." --Hamlet (III, ii, 239)