0
MF42

Grammar police gems

Recommended Posts

Quote

But . . . what . . . about . . . these . . . little . . . dots?



We grammar police call them ellipsis.

Officially, using them means you are omitting some information. The way people around here use them, though, there is usually not information omitted, just actual thought.

(And I will confess I am guilty of overuse of those little dots, sometimes when I just can't think of a way to end things...)
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


We grammar police call them ellipsis.



And that reminds me of another one!

"Us grammar police call them ellipsis."

And the related ones:

"My friend and me are going to the store."

"Just between you and I, grammar police are anal-retentive freaks."

And don't even get me started on the general lack of subject-verb agreement in this world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

"For all intensive purposes" :S

"Ect" instead of "Etc." - how people get "ect" out of et cetera boggles the mind.

"Women" when referring to a single woman. I have no idea how this came about, but it seems to be a pretty common problem.




NUCULAR:ph34r:
My photos

My Videos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The worst ones for me are the technical ones that end up having an entirely different meaning:-

Decent vs Descent
Break vs Brake
Yolk vs Yoke.

There is an article on the home page where at least two of the above are used....

And then there is the drouge. What exactly is a drouge?:P



what about desert and dessert?

(I always fuck that one up)
My photos

My Videos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Here's one I see on this forum all the time:

"Loose" instead of "Lose"

as in "I am going to loose my mind.":S

Read a fucking book once in a while, people!
>:(



Yea I fuck that one up too. but THAT is a fat finger problem.
My photos

My Videos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Orientate" is in the dictionary as an alternative to "orient."

I've never heard "conversate" used.

"Irregardless" annoys me.

I cut people a little more slack with "who" and "whom" because even I sometimes fail to pay close enough attention to the subject/object relation in my sentences.

I get annoyed when somebody frequently misuses "there"/"their"/"they're" or "your"/"you're" or "then"/"than" or "to"/"too"/"two" or "a lot"/"alot," but I do mistype those occasionally, when I'm typing too fast, so I have to forgive the occasional slipup.

Placing commas and periods outside the quotation marks annoys me; however, I agree with the British that there are times when it is more appropriate to place dashes, question marks, and exclamation points outside the quotation marks.

I think "y'all" should be accepted throughout the English speaking world, since the English language has no plural specific form of "you."

The fourth definition of "infer" is "HINT, SUGGEST," and the second definition of "imply" is "to express indirectly : hint at : SUGGEST," so even though I think it sounds better to use "imply" in certain situations, such as when the subject of the sentence is a non-human, I think the idea that "infer" must only be used to mean "GUESS, SURMISE" is more of a guideline than an actual English grammar rule.

Speaking of guidelines versus rules, not splitting infinitives and not ending sentences in prepositions are guidelines, not hard and fast rules of the English language. The teaching of these guidelines as rules stems from Latin, where they are rules. In English, however, splitting an infinitive or ending a sentence in a preposition is sometimes more appropriate than the alternative.
I don't have an M.D. or a law degree. I have bachelor's in kicking ass and taking names.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Speaking of guidelines versus rules, not splitting infinitives and not ending sentences in prepositions are guidelines, not hard and fast rules of the English language. The teaching of these guidelines as rules stems from Latin, where they are rules. In English, however, splitting an infinitive or ending a sentence in a preposition is sometimes more appropriate than the alternative.




What cracks me up is when people go out of their way to change the order of their preposition when it's not even at the end of the sentence anyway.

Example: "The pen with which you are writing is black." When "the pen you're writing with is black" would be perfectly acceptable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i was watching a powerpoint presentation given by a VP in my company and in one slide he was discussing the impact of hurricane katrina on operations in a particular district. the title of the slide was "katrina reeks havock".

ugh.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a sort of adopted Mom. She was an English major and when someone ends a sentence with a preposition, it really annoys her. When someone asks her "Where are you at?", she answers "Just before the at." :ph34r:
50 donations so far. Give it a try.

You know you want to spank it
Jump an Infinity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



[Lindercles]

Quote

Speaking of guidelines versus rules, not splitting infinitives and not ending sentences in prepositions are guidelines, not hard and fast rules of the English language. The teaching of these guidelines as rules stems from Latin, where they are rules. In English, however, splitting an infinitive or ending a sentence in a preposition is sometimes more appropriate than the alternative.




What cracks me up is when people go out of their way to change the order of their preposition when it's not even at the end of the sentence anyway.

Example: "The pen with which you are writing is black." When "the pen you're writing with is black" would be perfectly acceptable.



The premise behind not ending a sentence in a preposition is to keep the preposition as close as possible to its object. Your first example does move "pen" and "with" closer together, but I think we can probably all agree that it does so at the cost of making the sentence a little too wordy and convoluted.

[monkycndo]

Quote

I have a sort of adopted Mom. She was an English major and when someone ends a sentence with a preposition, it really annoys her. When someone asks her "Where are you at?", she answers "Just before the at." :ph34r:



In that example, the preposition "at" has no object, so its use is grammatically incorrect. Most of us are guilty of throwing in a lot of extra prepositions when we speak.
I don't have an M.D. or a law degree. I have bachelor's in kicking ass and taking names.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

But . . . what . . . about . . . these . . . little . . . dots?



We grammar police call them ellipsis.

Officially, using them means you are omitting some information. The way people around here use them, though, there is usually not information omitted, just actual thought.

(And I will confess I am guilty of overuse of those little dots, sometimes when I just can't think of a way to end things...)




I must confess...I am an ellipsis junky. I think an informal medium such as this forum can tolerate technical imperfection when the goal is expressing a personal "voice" through the written word. I use the ellipsis to indicate a pause longer than a comma.

Matt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The worst ones for me are the technical ones that end up having an entirely different meaning:-

Decent vs Descent
Break vs Brake
Yolk vs Yoke.

There is an article on the home page where at least two of the above are used....

And then there is the drouge. What exactly is a drouge?:P




Yup, saw that.B|
You'd think Germain would know better.:|

Matt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ok, I am often but not always omiting things when I use them.

generally I put them in because my train of thought is lost and I am changing direction.

Fuck, my grasp of grammar sucks. I might as well just admit it.

ok, who's going to flog me, cause I need a good flogging. :$:)
Livin' on the Edge... sleeping with my rigger's wife...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

"Orientate" is in the dictionary as an alternative to "orient."



I remember seeing the film "Pink Floyd Live at Pompeii". The film was made about 1971.

At one point there's an interview with a very long-haired, red-eyed David Gilmour, who is saying "...I know we have a reputation of being a sort of a drug-orientated band. 'Course we're not. You can trust us!"
Speed Racer
--------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I have a sort of adopted Mom. She was an English major and when someone ends a sentence with a preposition, it really annoys her. When someone asks her "Where are you at?", she answers "Just before the at." :ph34r:




When I moved from OK to the IL/WI area, this particular habit became much more common. Somebody would ask, "Hey Matt, we're all going to the show, you wanna come with?"
I stand there for a second, waiting for the sentence to be completed, then realize my friend thinks the sentence is done and he's waiting for an answer. It was a little bit awkward until I caught the rhythm.

Matt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Remember that one chick I used to work with, that you said looks like a frog, lectured myself and another girl about how she could "totally tell we are not from Texas because we spelled y'all - Y'ALL and only true native Texans know it is spelled YA'LL"

Give me a break :S

And yes Douva, you are a f'n grammar freak :P

my body, my choice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


ok, who's going to flog me, cause I need a good flogging. :$:)



Actually, I am going to give you credit for not saying "ok, whose going to flog me." :D:D:D:D

No flogging for you! Gold star for the appropriate use of the apostrophe and the contraction of "who is."
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I have a sort of adopted Mom. She was an English major and when someone ends a sentence with a preposition, it really annoys her. When someone asks her "Where are you at?", she answers "Just before the at." :ph34r:



Easily fixed: "Where are you at, Mom?";)
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0