d123 3 #101 June 1, 2009 Thanks!Lock, Dock and Two Smoking Barrelrolls! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
377 22 #102 June 1, 2009 In the late 60s I was a college student and couldn't afford good commercial gear. I did over a hundred round jumps on a worn out porous surplus C9 canopy. I HAD to do good PLFs every time or I would have broken some bones for sure. I made a lot of PLF landings backing up in the gusty afternoon winds. I think PLFs are important and should be learned but I question the ability of anyone but a gymnast to do a good PLF at high forward speeds, like what you'd get in a downwind landing under a ram air canopy. I guess anything is better than a high speed face plant, but PLFs at high forward speeds are probably beyond the ability of most jumpers in my opinion. 3772018 marks half a century as a skydiver. Trained by the late Perry Stevens D-51 in 1968. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phoenixlpr 0 #103 June 1, 2009 QuoteIn the late 60s I was a college student and couldn't afford good commercial gear. I did over a hundred round jumps on a worn out porous surplus C9 canopy. I HAD to do good PLFs every time or I would have broken some bones for sure. I made a lot of PLF landings backing up in the gusty afternoon winds. I think PLFs are important and should be learned but I question the ability of anyone but a gymnast to do a good PLF at high forward speeds, like what you'd get in a downwind landing under a ram air canopy. I guess anything is better than a high speed face plant, but PLFs at high forward speeds are probably beyond the ability of most jumpers in my opinion. 377 After seeing 2 students flaring 3-5m high....Yes, it is. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites