Question for the guys....

[Bolas 5]

To me, scantily clad is better than naked.

Stupidity if left untreated is self-correcting
If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh.

[RevJim 0]

Um, fyi, ultra small amounts of material = sexy. No material = slutty/trampy. You are on the right track!

No need to match (within reason, purple thongs don't go well with lime green push ups...) just make sure there is material there, but not enough to really cover much of anything. Just give us something that covers juuuuust enough, that we have to remove (or at least move) and we are SET!

It's your life, live it!
Karma
RB#684 "Corcho", ASK#60, Muff#3520, NCB#398, NHDZ#4, C-33989, DG#1

[sartre 0]

Quote

To me, scantily clad is better than naked

As in, shoes and a rig?

[Bolas 5]

I wore a helmet too.

Stupidity if left untreated is self-correcting
If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh.

[RastaRicanAir 0]

Quote

I just got my new Victoria's Secret catalogue, and I'm drooling over the cute lil matching underwear and bra sets.

Do you guys really care if we wear cute lil matching sets like this, or would you be perfectly content sitting/laying next to a gal with any type of underwear on???

I know, I know, the true preference would be nekkid - but I'm not inquiring about that!

I'm not making this a poll, cuz I want feedback!

g

Yes. ............There. Was that more enlightening than a poll?

O.K., I'll elaborate.
Yes we want you to put on the lingerie
YES, the more uncomfortable it is the better
And NO. We don't care if it itches or cuts off the circulation.

We do inconvenient stuff to get you in the mood too. Like showering.

Any guy who says he prefers nekkid is just lazy.

OrFunV/LocoBoca Rodriguez/Sonic Grieco/Muff Brother #4411
-"and ladies....messin with Robbie is venturing into territory you cant even imagine!-cuz Robbie is