shaiziel 0 #1 June 7, 2006 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1400054206/103-9558577-7443047?v=glance&n=283155 If you ask me, I'd say she had the picture altered to make her waistline appear smaller. The hourglass shape from that angle is just kind of extreme. Knowing that she is very self-conscious about her appearance, I wouldn't put it past her to have that done. (Remember the TIME magazine fiasco with her legs.) SC Material here: I hate her with a passion.---------------------------------------- 6.8% - Almost there! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pop 0 #2 June 7, 2006 Sorry...dont know who that is7 ounce wonders, music and dogs that are not into beer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shaiziel 0 #3 June 7, 2006 Consider yourself lucky. Just know she makes a living writing books and giving lectures both of which contain anything she can dream up to get the leftists in a frenzy. I think most reasonable people would agree that she probably doesn't believe most of what she says. Doesn't matter though. The picture looks 'shopped and I think that in her particular case, it goes beyond pathetic. ---------------------------------------- 6.8% - Almost there! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #4 June 7, 2006 She's pretty skinny so it might be about right, but the line of her back doesn't look quite right even if in proportion. photoshop IMO - and nothing wrong with that - it's about marketing a product ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shaiziel 0 #5 June 7, 2006 Cool. Just needed some outside verification. I saw the book cover in person at Waldenbooks yesterday and just laughed after taking a good look.---------------------------------------- 6.8% - Almost there! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
micro 0 #6 June 7, 2006 Quotehttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1400054206/103-9558577-7443047?v=glance&n=283155 If you ask me, I'd say she had the picture altered to make her waistline appear smaller. The hourglass shape from that angle is just kind of extreme. Knowing that she is very self-conscious about her appearance, I wouldn't put it past her to have that done. (Remember the TIME magazine fiasco with her legs.) SC Material here: I hate her with a passion. for some reason, the pic wouldn't open, but judging on your comments, you must be talking about ann coulter. her legs are so skinny i could floss my teeth w/ them. good thing i'm not a cannibal. I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shaiziel 0 #7 June 7, 2006 I saw a picture of her sitting on a desk from the side that was not using a crazy lens or angle which provided a profile shot of her legs. They looked almost as long as the Time mag cover. I figured since she went on some massive attack against Time about it, you know it has to be a sensitive subject for her. ---------------------------------------- 6.8% - Almost there! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steveorino 7 #8 June 7, 2006 nah, nobody edits photos for publication. steveOrino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymama 37 #9 June 7, 2006 How is that different than any publicity picture you see of any actress in Hollywood?She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man, because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windcatcher 0 #10 June 7, 2006 In the bigger scheme of things, does it really matter? Mother to the cutest little thing in the world... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #11 June 7, 2006 She's a skinny waif as it is. Furthermore, there are poses that can have the "slimming down" effect. This one has the requirements: 1) Lower body not facing camera; 2) Torso turned closer to camera so shoulders are almost facing camera; 3) Arm closest to camera at hip level like drawing a line between the crests of the hips. Everytime my wife watches one of those revolting hollywood red-carpet shows, all the chicks have that same pose, only standing. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shaiziel 0 #12 June 7, 2006 It's not... but I haven't seen many other media types raise so much of a stink like she does. EDIT: about her image. And again, a lot of it is because I dislike her. ---------------------------------------- 6.8% - Almost there! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hisgoofyness 0 #13 June 7, 2006 personally... I like Ann, she cracks me up! (Most of the time I agree with her as well...; but I will leave that part alone as I don't want to get dragged in to SC) Goudha is for Buddha, and that's good enough for me! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #14 June 7, 2006 QuoteQuotehttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1400054206/103-9558577-7443047?v=glance&n=283155 If you ask me, I'd say she had the picture altered to make her waistline appear smaller. The hourglass shape from that angle is just kind of extreme. Knowing that she is very self-conscious about her appearance, I wouldn't put it past her to have that done. (Remember the TIME magazine fiasco with her legs.) SC Material here: I hate her with a passion. for some reason, the pic wouldn't open, but judging on your comments, you must be talking about ann coulter. her legs are so skinny i could floss my teeth w/ them. good thing i'm not a cannibal. _______________________________ She's so skinny, you could use her for a buggy whip! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shaiziel 0 #15 June 7, 2006 See now this is why I posted it. My first impulse was to say it was shopped... but here is a voice of reason shining a light on a different perspective that I overlooked. It's conceivable. I'll give it the benefit of the doubt.---------------------------------------- 6.8% - Almost there! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrophyHusband 0 #16 June 7, 2006 i doubt it, she is super-skinny. her rants could be amusing, but i just can't stop staring at her abnormally long giraffe neck. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
racer42 0 #17 June 7, 2006 It's obviously been photoshopped because the horns and her tail are missingL.A.S.T. #24 Co-Founder Biscuit Brothers Freefly Team Electric Toaster #3 Co-Founder Team Non Sequitor Co-Founder Team Happy Sock Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MagicGuy 0 #18 June 7, 2006 Quotehttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1400054206/103-9558577-7443047?v=glance&n=283155 If you ask me, I'd say she had the picture altered to make her waistline appear smaller. The hourglass shape from that angle is just kind of extreme. Knowing that she is very self-conscious about her appearance, I wouldn't put it past her to have that done. (Remember the TIME magazine fiasco with her legs.) SC Material here: I hate her with a passion. Extreme? This is extreme. http://www.jonco48.com/blog/waist2_small2.jpg Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtval 0 #19 June 7, 2006 she's not too far from the people who picket military funerals. extreme nutbagMy photos My Videos Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shaiziel 0 #20 June 7, 2006 Don't forget the man-face.---------------------------------------- 6.8% - Almost there! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChangoLanzao 0 #21 June 8, 2006 Who cares???? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeBobinNC 0 #22 June 8, 2006 Who cares?... and yes I'd hit it. It doesn't matter if a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Conundrum 1 #23 June 8, 2006 No, I don't think it's chopped. She's standing at an angle and sometimes the skin kind of wrinkles together and makes that sharp crease there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #24 June 8, 2006 QuoteHow is that different than any publicity picture you see of any actress in Hollywood? Answer: This one is a conservative. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
