norcalbaker 0 #1 November 7, 2007 I have heard a lot of bad talk at the DZ about the tempo, that even some riggers wont even pack it, i have a tempo 170 loaded 1:1, should i be worried at? BLUE SKIES Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhreeZone 20 #2 November 7, 2007 It passed its TSO certification, that should give you some confidence with it. Early Tempo's did not have span wise reenforcements so people liked them since they packed small but on high speed openings (freeflying) they can suffer more damage then a canopy with more reenforcement.Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
relyon 0 #3 November 7, 2007 There's lots of information posted on Tempo's, both good and not so good (hint - search). I have nothing but good things to say about mine (a 170 DOM 96). See here and here, among others. Bob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
indyz 1 #4 November 7, 2007 I don't like mine. I put two rides on my Tempo 170 (1.2:1 wingloading) this year. It opened just fine, flew straight, and turned like a barge. I was glad I was under the reserve at 3000ft on the first one, because it gave me lots of time to play with the stall point, which was at my shoulders, just about where I would have expected half-brakes to be. It was a windy day and I made a hard but not painful stand-up landing into a plowed field. The second one I landed on grass and PLFed without thinking twice. The problem I have with Tempos is that there doesn't seem to be any consistency. Some are great, some have a built-in turn, mine could have hurt me if I hadn't had time to practice my flare. If you buy one, make sure the previous owner has actually used it, and is somebody you trust to give you an honest assessment of how it flies. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #5 November 7, 2007 I have a Tempo 120. I have used it a couple of times, as well as a Tempo 150. I didn't care how the controls were, as long as I could turn it and flare it enough to land me down in one piece. I know it does not flare that well and I've never stood up any of my reserve landings. I either PLFed or slid it in. I did test the flare once before coming in for landing and decided to wrap the brake lines around my wrists once and then flare for landing. It helped a little bit. However, in the future when it's time for a new rig, I will probably opt for one of the newer reserves of the time that is built better."Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fast 0 #6 November 7, 2007 QuoteI don't like mine. I put two rides on my Tempo 170 (1.2:1 wingloading) this year. It opened just fine, flew straight, and turned like a barge. I was glad I was under the reserve at 3000ft on the first one, because it gave me lots of time to play with the stall point, which was at my shoulders, just about where I would have expected half-brakes to be. It was a windy day and I made a hard but not painful stand-up landing into a plowed field. The second one I landed on grass and PLFed without thinking twice. The problem I have with Tempos is that there doesn't seem to be any consistency. Some are great, some have a built-in turn, mine could have hurt me if I hadn't had time to practice my flare. If you buy one, make sure the previous owner has actually used it, and is somebody you trust to give you an honest assessment of how it flies. It's all the stories like this that I have heard from people that make me such a PD snob. My new Micron that is coming in February is gonna have a brand spankin new optimum reserve!~D Where troubles melt like lemon drops Away above the chimney tops That's where you'll find me. Swooping is taking one last poke at the bear before escaping it's cave - davelepka Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeedToJump 0 #7 November 7, 2007 Quote I don't like mine. Then why do you still own it? I don't understand why people settle on something they don't like when it comes to a reserve. Do you really want something you don't like or can't land well as your last chance? I agree with Fast about being PD snob. I've tried a lot of main canopies but have only ever owned PD. I will not jump a rig that doesn't have a PD reserve in it; it's just not worth it to me. I want to know that if I have to use my reserve, it is going to work and fly well. I don't just want a reserve that will get me to the ground alive, I want a reserve that will get me to ground in the same condition I was in when I left it. PDR or Optimum for me, thanks Wind Tunnel and Skydiving Coach http://www.ariperelman.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
indyz 1 #8 November 7, 2007 QuoteQuoteI don't like mine. Then why do you still own it? It sucks, but it's not dangerous. I won't buy another one, but I'm not in any hurry to replace it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
relyon 0 #9 November 7, 2007 My apologies for the thread drift, but the replies so far make me wonder how many F-111 7-cell rides people have. I can think of at least 5 people, each of whom has more than 30 jumps on their reserve. One has over 40. It's the exact same canopy in every case but one, and that one has 20 or so jumps. Several manufacturers and/or models too. A couple things are consistent: 1) low wingloading (< 1.2) and 2) no injuries during use or landing (many were off field). As always, YMMV. Bob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beowulf 1 #10 November 7, 2007 Quotehow many F-111 7-cell rides people have My first canopy was PD 9-cell 150. Is that close enough? I have one jump on a PDR 143 And a few jumps on a Lightning 143. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peckerhead 0 #11 November 8, 2007 Quote My apologies for the thread drift, but the replies so far make me wonder how many F-111 7-cell rides people have. Or how many round jumps for that matter. A few round reserve rides and I bet that Tempo wouldn't seem so badIf you can't land a Tempo then maybe it is overloaded or it is not being flown correctly. They just don't flare the same as the zp mains most people are used to these days. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ronaldo 0 #12 November 8, 2007 If you're not 100% sure you have a good reserve, you may put it in another rig as a main and jump it (hop'n pop or static line). Play with it, check the flare and learn to fly it in controlled conditions. Before doing this check with your rigger as it may void the use as a reserve (for some manufacturers).Engineering Law #5: The most vital dimension on any plan drawing stands the most chance of being omitted Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VideoFly 0 #13 November 8, 2007 I've had two reserve rides on two different Tempo 150s. They flew like dogs compared to my smaller elliptical nine cells, but just fine for a reserve. I wrapped the longer brake lines on my second ride to get a little more flair. They landed like F111 seven cell canopies because that's what they are. I have another Tempo 150 in my rig now and I have total confidence in it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
faulknerwn 38 #14 November 8, 2007 I've got about 8 jumps on my Tempo 120 and they land great. I definitely agree that you shouldn't overload them, but mine fly great. Of course I have close to 4000 jumps on tiny 7-cells so I don't try and fly them like a 9-cell. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D22369 0 #15 November 8, 2007 Tempo's do their job, they get you to the ground in one piece, I have 3 rides on two different tempo's, all were quick on heading openings, both flew straight, they turn like a skybarge, but the landings were fine, but dont expect it to land like a zp canopy. You should ask the people who are bashing it how many tempo's they have jumped, most will respond none, and are just repeating the same bullshit that someone else said. At a 1-1 wingloading it will be slow, stable and easily landed If you find a rigger that won't pack it, find a better rigger. I would still be using a tempo if I hadnt made a bad trade (freaking girlfriend) -ex now thank gawd RoyThey say I suffer from insanity.... But I actually enjoy it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
monkycndo 0 #16 November 8, 2007 I have one jump on a Tempo loaded at around 1.0:1. It was very early in my jumping so I had little reference as to how it landed. It got me down safe with no injuries, but it was not pretty. Looking back later, it didn't have the greatest flare. If loaded lightly, I would still jump a borrowed rig that contained a Tempo. I now have a PDR143 loaded at 1.4:1. I demo'd one to see how it flies/flares. It was easy to fly and I put it in the peas with a soft landing. It has made me a believer in PDRs. Have one in my backup rig as well.50 donations so far. Give it a try. You know you want to spank it Jump an Infinity Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KNewman 0 #17 November 8, 2007 Sooooo..... You traded your Tempo for a new girlfriend who is now your ex???? Blue Skies and Stand-up Landings!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adobelover 0 #18 November 8, 2007 Almost any canopy can get a bad reputation. There are bound to be lots of variables depending upon each situation. Hubby says his Tempo 210 worked just fine and he stood up the landing. It's a RESERVE...to save your ass from certain death. If you are used to flying a 9 cell ZP, that F111 7 cell reserve is probably gonna turn like a barge and the landing will be at a steeper angle and not what you're used to...my worthless nickle's worth! _________________________________________ Old age ain't no place for sissies! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdog07 0 #19 November 8, 2007 most people jump 9 cell canopy and they have F111 7 cell reserve, yes they flare different just like all 7 cell compare to 9 cell, if you never jump a 7 cell you need to demo main or reserve if you can and see how much they are different, my tempo loaded at 1.48 I have nice landing no need for plf"A peaceful heart leads to a healthy body; jealousy is like cancer in the bones ..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D22369 0 #20 November 9, 2007 Sooooo..... You traded your Tempo for a new girlfriend who is now your ex???? *** LOL - I knew someone would say something.. she bought a rig off ebay with a micro raven in it, I didnt want her on it at over a 1-1 wingload, so I swapped her my tempo for her raven.... I shoulda requested it back when we split (not that she would have traded anyhow) I miss my tempo the raven is really stall happy, but it works.Roy They say I suffer from insanity.... But I actually enjoy it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
councilman24 37 #21 November 9, 2007 Quote Then why do you still own it? I don't understand why people settle on something they don't like when it comes to a reserve. Do you really want something you don't like or can't land well as your last chance? I agree with Fast about being PD snob. I've tried a lot of main canopies but have only ever owned PD. I will not jump a rig that doesn't have a PD reserve in it; it's just not worth it to me. I want to know that if I have to use my reserve, it is going to work and fly well. I don't just want a reserve that will get me to the ground alive, I want a reserve that will get me to ground in the same condition I was in when I left it. PDR or Optimum for me, thanks Now I've heard everything. Won't jump a rig without a PD reserve. I can understanding choosing to only own a PD reserve, I can even understand (but believe it's extreme) not ever jumping without an AAD. But NEVER jumping ANY RIG without a PD reserve? I knew their marketing was good but now we've gotten to mind control.And PDR's and Optimum's are two completely different canopies. Not just different fabrics. Why haven't you choosen between them?I'm old for my age. Terry Urban D-8631 FAA DPRE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeedToJump 0 #22 November 9, 2007 I believe that PD reserves are the best reserves out there and, if I have to use a reserve, I want the best one there is. It's my life and it's worth it to me. I've had two reserve rides on PDRs and they were extremely easy to fly and land. I know the amount of R&D that goes into making them and the testing they go through. I won't settle for anything less when it comes to my reserve. Extreme? Sure. Uninformed mind control? Nope. Quote And PDR's and Optimum's are two completely different canopies. Not just different fabrics. Why haven't you choosen between them? I'm well aware that they are completely different. I trust my life to both of them. Why do I have to choose between them? I currently own two PDRs and am getting an Optimum for my new rig. And not that it matters to this discussions, but I've made plenty of jumps with no ADD, but I still had my PDR Wind Tunnel and Skydiving Coach http://www.ariperelman.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peckerhead 0 #23 November 9, 2007 Quote You should ask the people who are bashing it how many tempo's they have jumped, most will respond none, and are just repeating the same bullshit that someone else said. Exactly! Several years ago I was at a riggers course and this young kid tells me that he got rid of his Tempo and bought a PD because they are much safer and fly alot better. When I asked him how many reserve rides he had and if he had ever jumped a Tempo.... His response was that he had no reserve rides. None! But somewhere along the line somebody convinced him that PDs are good and Tempos are bad. I tried to explain TSOs and so forth but his mind was made up. In my opinion Tempos are good solid reserves. The newer models are even better. The Smart is very similar and basically the new improved model. If you can't get a good landing on a Tempo then you have it overloaded or you need better training. For the record I have a PD, Smart, and a Tempo in my rigs. All about the same size (143, 135, 150) and I would not hesitate to jump ANY of them. I don't think the landings would be significantly different. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrmanta 0 #24 November 9, 2007 I've only got one ride on my tempo. It opened perfectly, flew smoothly, and stood up the landing. Like everyone said, it's a 7-cell f-111 so it doesn't have the flare you might be used to. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrewEckhardt 0 #25 November 10, 2007 QuoteI have heard a lot of bad talk at the DZ about the tempo, that even some riggers wont even pack it, i have a tempo 170 loaded 1:1, should i be worried at? BLUE SKIES Having seen a reserve with a single span-wise reinforcing tape at the tail holding the 2 & 5 cell pieces held together (not a Tempo), I would not put a pre-2001 Tempo in a rig I intended to freefly with. When your reserve breaks like that you spin in and life sucks. I also won't bother to replace the Tempo I have in my wingsuit rig or Super Raven in my accuracy rig. FWIW, my Tempo 150 flies straight and lands fine at exit weights to 200 pounds. The PD143 has nice light front riser pressure but you're not buying a reserve for how pleasant it is to fly. This construction is not unique to the Tempo - most older reserves including Precisions's original Ravens (through the -M) did not have span-wise tapes either. Reserves without tapes are usually rated for 130 knots (150 MPH). PDs have always had the tapes. Precision added them to the R-max. Smarts have tapes. Rated deployment speeds of 150 knots (172 MPH) are common on reserves with tapes. Comfortable freefly speeds are in the 140-160+ MPH range. You have to use the reserve beyond its rated deployment speed to have problems, although that's what happens on a premature freefly deployment or when you loose track of altitude and have a Cypres fire or dump immediately. While unconscious you may also fall in a high-speed head-down position. Also if you get a Tempo don't pay too much. IIRC I paid $550 for mine brand new versus nearly $800 for the PD. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites