Recommended Posts
riggerrob 643
I think the military still uses type I on a flat 24'...I think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, but remember that 24 flats are designed for low-speed deployments.
Low speed deployments are far more forgiving of sloppy packing methods.
With military static-line systems, you have a 99.99999 percent chance of having a partially-inflated main overhead before you need to deploy a 24 flat.
AMT 0
agree, I dont mind the type I in the PT17 or a T34 or even SNJ, but I wouldnt want it in an L39, strongs harness restraint system can use a C9 but I dont think they use a diaper, softie offers that option, and I like it. Orderly deployment on a durable canopy, I will accept the additional bulk.
mark 107
Yes, but remember that 24 flats are designed for low-speed deployments.
Low speed deployments are far more forgiving of sloppy packing methods.
With military static-line systems, you have a 99.99999 percent chance of having a partially-inflated main overhead before you need to deploy a 24 flat.
Additionally, the 24 flat is intended for use in addition to, not instead of, the main canopy. In the event of a main malfunction, the reserve is hand-deployed: thrown down and in the direction of spin. With Type 1 deployment, the canopy begins to fill right away, and line extension is much faster because the drag of the inflating canopy is much greater than the drag of a diapered canopy.
Inflation in that situation is still quite slow, as I can attest from experience.
Mark
Andy9o8 2
I think the military still uses type I on a flat 24'...I think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, but remember that 24 flats are designed for low-speed deployments.
Low speed deployments are far more forgiving of sloppy packing methods.
With military static-line systems, you have a 99.99999 percent chance of having a partially-inflated main overhead before you need to deploy a 24 flat.
That being said, they have saved many a civilian life on terminal deployments with nothing else out - as my existing to type this today attests.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90b59/90b598f60c332af5022d69de2ca83094992830c1" alt="B| B|"
JerryBaumchen 1,373
Hi Andy,
That being said, they have saved many a civilian life on terminal deployments with nothing else out - as my existing to type this today attests.
Put me down for that, only change it to twice,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d6ba/5d6ba79da74a103878dc40a5a342480ed13eb97d" alt=":S :S"
JerryBaumchen
I have some seats and 1980's back type I (nb8, etc) that I wore, and sometimes still do, I didnt consider them fatal, I like the C9's...though butlers diaper on a 28' in a new rig is very appealing.
I think the military still uses type I on a flat 24'...I think?
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites