Recommended Posts
NWFlyer 2
QuoteWell I'm glad the movie is getting all the attention, but my patience is wearing thin with your continued failure to see it But I'll try to be patient a little longer
Okay, Keith, you can stop being such a drama queen. I saw it today.
I agree with the assessments that the characters were a bit underdeveloped. Especially the supporting characters.
But I still really enjoyed it, particuarly the performances. Heath Ledger completely blew me away; I don't think I expected quite so much from him and he really gave a powerful performance. I noticed it in that I really believed his character was aging (and you could see all his struggle on his face), while Gyllenhall looked like a kid playing dressup.
And of course, since it's an Ang Lee movie, it's fucking *beautiful*. Cinematography was stellar. Either the sound editing or the projection was weak, because I had a tough time understanding dialogue in several scenes. (I'm leaning towards sound editing, otherwise I wouldn't have been able to understand all the dialogue).
Overall, solid B+/A- movie.
Quote
I think you meant to compliment Rodrigo Prieto, the DP. He also shot Amores Perros, Frida, 8 mile, 21 grams, and a TON of other stuff.
Sorry, pet peeve.
Keith 0
Any one else see it?
Don't Fuck with me Keith - J. Mandeville
NWFlyer 2
QuoteI think you meant to compliment Rodrigo Prieto, the DP. He also shot Amores Perros, Frida, 8 mile, 21 grams, and a TON of other stuff.
Sorry, pet peeve.
Good point, I should call out the cinematographer specifically, but you do have to concede that the director often has a "style" that gets imprinted on the movie (although perhaps that says as much about Lee as it does about his choice of top cinematographers, too).
DEFINITELY.......just not Lee, Ang. By this I mean that he is no Bertolucci, Scorsese, Fincher, Wong Kar-wai, Tsai...........to name but a few. IN OTHER WORDS, I challenge you to look at a Lee movie, like say, Scorsese, and be able to know that he directed it. I just don't see it.
NWFlyer 2
QuoteDEFINITELY.......just not Lee, Ang. By this I mean that he is no Bertolucci, Scorsese, Fincher, Wong Kar-wai, Tsai...........to name but a few. IN OTHER WORDS, I challenge you to look at a Lee movie, like say, Scorsese, and be able to know that he directed it. I just don't see it.
Fair enough. I'm inclined to agree with you now that I actually look at his list of movies and realize he didn't direct some of what I thought he did. But it's still a beautiful movie.
even from the previews, this is obvious and at least part of the reason I will be going. The only problem is that living in this hillbilly town, I have to wait till the 30th.
QuoteI challenge you to look at a Lee movie, like say, Scorsese, and be able to know that he directed it. I just don't see it.
During Brokeback Mountain I kept waiting for something giant and green to pop out, but to no avail.
--------------------------------------------------
the sequel man, wait for the frikkin sequel!
Quotehaven't seen the movie, but could it be possible that the great visuals of the scenery might be more due to the fact that the country in that area really is spectacular, more so than any skill in cinematography on the part of Ang Lee or whatever the fuck his name is?
no.....but when we need more reductive answers, we will definitely let ya know.
Ok, finally saw Brokeback Mountain last night and thoroughly enjoyed it. Tragic and timeless love story that, imho, transcended the sexuality of the characters. (not that there anything wrong with THAT)
QuoteI agree with the assessments that the characters were a bit underdeveloped. Especially the supporting characters.
I am not sure I agree with this. We know as much as we need to know, when we need to know it. For instance, when Ennis meets Jack's parents at the end, it all makes sense, who he is I mean. I can't imagine meeting them or finding more about him earlier. And as far as supporting characters, they were incidental compared to their love for each other. They were punctuation in the time they spent apart.
QuoteBut I still really enjoyed it, particuarly the performances. Heath Ledger completely blew me away; I don't think I expected quite so much from him and he really gave a powerful performance. I noticed it in that I really believed his character was aging (and you could see all his struggle on his face).
The way Leadger carried himself, the way he mumbled, the starkness to every aspect of his life just worked. It was a landmark performance. If he doesn't score Oscar, there is gonna be hell to pay.
Quotewhile Gyllenhall looked like a kid playing dressup
Now, Krisanne, do you REALLY mean that? I felt like that naive childlike quality he had worked and reflected how his upbringing was tragic but that he responded to it differently than Ennis'. You even see how he brought that out in Ennis later on, like when he was getting ready to GO FISHING.
QuoteCinematography was stellar.
It was pretty amazing, especially the way they were able to equate their attraction as natural, a story as old as the hills, etc. They didn't just USE the place and make it "pretty". Appropriation of naturalism is tricky in film and it worked beautifully.
QuoteOverall, solid B+/A- movie.
I am gonna go with A-. Any film that adds up to something greater than the sum of its parts is pretty special. While I may not be gay, I was acutely aware of how far away I was from my SO while watching this film and how that awareness turned into a bona fide ache when I walked out. What more can you ask for from a movie?
ok, MAYBE a "wetshot", but I think that is a whole other genre.
NWFlyer 2
QuoteI am not sure I agree with this. We know as much as we need to know, when we need to know it. For instance, when Ennis meets Jack's parents at the end, it all makes sense, who he is I mean. I can't imagine meeting them or finding more about him earlier. And as far as supporting characters, they were incidental compared to their love for each other. They were punctuation in the time they spent apart.
Fair enough, but I thought it was one way that you could tell that they were creating a two-hour movie out of a short story... felt a little thin at times.
QuoteNow, Krisanne, do you REALLY mean that? I felt like that naive childlike quality he had worked and reflected how his upbringing was tragic but that he responded to it differently than Ennis'. You even see how he brought that out in Ennis later on, like when he was getting ready to GO FISHING.
I guess it was something about the way Jake carried himself. I could see the "weight of the world" on Ledger's face, and besides all the makeup/greying of hair, I *felt* him getting older. I just thought Jake looked a little silly as they aged him. I didn't get the same sense that he was aging/wearing as I did with Heath.
I agree with your observations, but I related them to character. Ennis didn't have money, friends, trips to mexico, other prospects, etc. Even the waitress had to lasso him. Sorry, too easy. I think he was suppossed to look a little silly and peter panish, UNTIL he would get together with Ennis. That last meeting it all came out. Like when Ennis told him he wouldn't be able to get away as much.
Keith 0
QuoteI could see the "weight of the world" on Ledger's face
Like when he said to Jack, "I wouldn't be this way if it weren't for you. Lonley, alone, and nowhere."
Don't Fuck with me Keith - J. Mandeville
Keith 0
QuoteEven the waitress had to lasso him.
I think that's because his heart belonged to Jack.
Don't Fuck with me Keith - J. Mandeville
I can't wait to see it....but it doesn't screen here in NZ until 23rd Feb.
Benji
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites