0
PeteW

How many people have never done drugs?

Recommended Posts

Quote

everyone does drugs, legality simply depends on culture and jurisdiction.. neither of which have any real bearing on their value or experience... but wont stop anyone from feeling superior to some who makes different personal choices...[:/]


I think the real difference should not be legality but instead the purpose and the harm incurred. For instance, I think caffiene is almost harmless, so I could care less about coffee addicts. Too much acetaminophene is actually a lot more harmful than people know but due to the lack of awareness of the people using it, I won't hold it against them. Alcohol, nicotene, marijuana, cocaine, etc are recreational drugs with no other benifit. It tend to have less respect for the use of these drugs, as they seem to show the ignorance of the user who made that choice, because in the end he still has gained nothing. I think a choice would more likely apply to someone who used performance enhancing drugs. These people are far more likely to have weighed their options and thought through the positive and negative effects from their choice. I would respect them more than a recreational drug user always.
Although I have looked at the entire picture before making an opinion its still my opinion, so I will leave it at that.
If I could make a wish, I think I'd pass.
Can't think of anything I need
No cigarettes, no sleep, no light, no sound.
Nothing to eat, no books to read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Other than mary-jane and alchohol,nadda for me. No cigarettes, though, I feel complelled to add.

It scares me to try something someone concocted in their basement.

Edit--wow, after reading everyone' comments, I don't feel so innocent anymore. :P
Paint me in a corner, but my color comes back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It tend to have less respect for the use of these drugs, as they seem to the ignorance of the user who made that choice, because in the end he still has gained nothing.



gained nothing???? shit i will tell you this, i have gained alot form recreational drug use..... nothing that is productive, but hell i had a good time while high back in high school, don't get me wrong though, i've had just a good a time stone cold sober... but it's nothing that one doesn't get anything out of it, it's just that it is mesurable only to that person.....


p.s. my spelling was already this bad before i ever did drugs, so don't hold that against me.....

______________________________________
"i have no reader's digest version"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It tend to have less respect for the use of these drugs, as they seem to the ignorance of the user who made that choice, because in the end he still has gained nothing.



gained nothing???? shit i will tell you this, i have gained alot form recreational drug use..... nothing that is productive, but hell i had a good time while high back in high school, don't get me wrong though, i've had just a good a time stone cold sober... but it's nothing that one doesn't get anything out of it, it's just that it is mesurable only to that person.....


p.s. my spelling was already this bad before i ever did drugs, so don't hold that against me.....


Ok, its true that they will get a certain temporary feeling and that many will state that they enjoy this feeling. So I guess I should have specified gained nothing concrete. But then again, having had a feeling does not mean you gained something. Actually after the "good feeling" goes away, they are right back where they started, with nothing new to show for.
If I could make a wish, I think I'd pass.
Can't think of anything I need
No cigarettes, no sleep, no light, no sound.
Nothing to eat, no books to read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

But then again, having had a feeling does not mean you gained something. Actually after the "good feeling" goes away, they are right back where they started, with nothing new to show for.



it's entertainment value... just like playing craps, if lose my money i still gained because i was entertaained for a while.......

______________________________________
"i have no reader's digest version"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I don't know who the hell you are trying to convince that drugs are NOT bad for you...come on, for the love of Pete...even cigarette smokers admit the shit is bad for you. Who the hell are you kidding?!



Maybe they're not kidding anyone. Check out this article about a study done by Donald Tashkin, "It is Tashkin's research that the Drug Czar's office cites in ads linking marijuana to lung cancer."

Quote

"Our major hypothesis," he told the ICRS, "was that heavy, longterm use of marijuana will increase the risk of lung and upper-airwaves cancers."

The Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance program provided Tashkin's team with the names of 1,209 L.A. residents aged 59 or younger with cancer (611 lung, 403 oral/pharyngeal, 90 laryngeal, 108 esophageal). Interviewers collected extensive lifetime histories of marijuana, tobacco, alcohol and other drug use, and data on diet, occupational exposures, family history of cancer, and various "socio-demographic factors." Exposure to marijuana was measured in joint years (joints per day x 365). Controls were found based on age, gender and neighborhood. Among them, 46% had never used marijuana, 31% had used less than one joint year, 12% had used 10-30 j-yrs, 2% had used 30-60 j-yrs, and 3% had used for more than 60 j-yrs. Tashkin controlled for tobacco use and calculated the relative risk of marijuana use resulting in lung and upper airwaves cancers. All the odds ratios turned out to be less than one (one being equal to the control group's chances)! Compared with subjects who had used less than one joint year, the estimated odds ratios for lung cancer were .78; for 1-10 j-yrs, .74; for 10-30 j-yrs, .85 for 30-60 j-yrs; and 0.81 for more than 60 j-yrs. The estimated odds ratios for oral/pharyngeal cancers were 0.92 for 1-10 j-yrs; 0.89 for 10-30 j-yrs; 0.81 for 30-60 j-yrs; and 1.0 for more than 60 j-yrs. "Similar, though less precise results were obtained for the other cancer sites," Tashkin reported. "We found absolutely no suggestion of a dose response." The data on tobacco use, as expected, revealed "a very potent effect and a clear dose-response relationship -a 21-fold greater risk of developing lung cancer if you smoke more than two packs a day." Similarly high odds obtained for oral/pharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer and esophageal cancer. "So, in summary" Tashkin concluded, "we failed to observe a positive association of marijuana use and other potential confounders."

There was time for only one question, said the moderator, and San Francisco oncologist Donald Abrams, M.D., was already at the microphone: "You don't see any positive correlation, but in at least one category [marijuana-only smokers and lung cancer], it almost looked like there was a negative correlation, i.e., a protective effect. Could you comment on that?"

"Yes," said Tashkin. "The odds ratios are less than one almost consistently, and in one category that relationship was significant, but I think that it would be difficult to extract from these data the conclusion that marijuana is protective against lung cancer. But that is not an unreasonable hypothesis."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Alcohol, nicotene, marijuana, cocaine, etc are recreational drugs with no other benifit.



Care to support this statement? I can think of valid medical uses for at least two of these drugs, and I'm not sure Cocaine is wholly without legitimate uses.


Yeah but I don't think this thread was started to ask if anybody had ever used drugs following a doctor's prescription. And I don't think that what they had in mind was somebody who was using them for medicinal purposes inspite of not having a prescription to do so.
If I could make a wish, I think I'd pass.
Can't think of anything I need
No cigarettes, no sleep, no light, no sound.
Nothing to eat, no books to read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I don't think this thread was started to ask if anybody had ever used drugs following a doctor's prescription. And I don't think that what they had in mind was somebody who was using them for medicinal purposes inspite of not having a prescription to do so.



You said tyhere were no non-recreational benefits for drugs like marijuana, nicotine and cocaine. That is clearly untrue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Alcohol, nicotene, marijuana, cocaine, etc are recreational drugs with no other benifit.



Care to support this statement? I can think of valid medical uses for at least two of these drugs, and I'm not sure Cocaine is wholly without legitimate uses.



Marijuana is used for medicinal purposes, for eating disorders and cheomo (sp?) treatment.
__________________

BOOM Headshot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

if you dont try something for whatever reason (personal, religious, legal etc) you are depriving yourself of an experience..

it may be a good one or a bad one, and you will likely never know for sure, but you are STILL missing an experience..



Damn. I never thought about it that way. Next jump, I'll try a 270 under a Sabre 120. After all, I don't want to deny myself that experience.



I would suggest that you wait a while, 18 jumps is a little earlier to start to swoop, get some more jumps and progressively downsize canopy’s. Get some coaching and don’t try to rush into it, otherwise you will hurt yourself….

Don’t worry you will get there eventually, and be able to experience the feeling of busting out a sweet 270 front riser approach…


What this has to do with illegal drugs, im not quite sure...
-----------------------------------------------------------
--+ There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.. --+

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It tend to have less respect for the use of these drugs, as they seem to show the ignorance of the user who made that choice, because in the end he still has gained nothing.




Quote

And If you don't believe drugs have done good things for us, do me a favour. Go home tonight take all your albums, all your tapes and all your CDs and burn them. 'Cause You know the musicians that made all that great music that's enhanced your lives throughout the years? RrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrEAL fucking high on drugs -bill hicks



:D
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It tend to have less respect for the use of these drugs, as they seem to show the ignorance of the user who made that choice, because in the end he still has gained nothing.




Quote

And If you don't believe drugs have done good things for us, do me a favour. Go home tonight take all your albums, all your tapes and all your CDs and burn them. 'Cause You know the musicians that made all that great music that's enhanced your lives throughout the years? RrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrEAL fucking high on drugs -bill hicks



:D



not to mention:
artists, poets, wriiters, philosophers, good guys, bad guys, etc.
Goddam dirty hippies piss me off! ~GFD
"What do I get for closing your rig?" ~ me
"Anything you want." ~ female skydiver
Mohoso Rodriguez #865

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
***Gettin' to like you more by the minute there Psycho!!!


Quote

If your at WFFC the first round is on me.

"I'm not a gynecologist but I will take a look at it"
RB #1295, Smokey Sister #1, HellFish #658, Dirty Sanchez #194, Muff Brothers #3834, POPS #9614, Orfun Foster-Parent?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Call me crazy, but I just don't think 'lung cancer' was the major issue with marajuana. I'm thinking the altered state might be a tad more in line with what's dangerous...and I guess lower sperm count doesn't mean anything anymore? And the research from back in the late 80's about how it does permanent damage to your brain cells...wrong? I don't know. I haven't had the need to do in-depth research on the effects of marajuana. I just don't care.

But geesh...as long as it doesn't cause lung cancer, it's good for you?! :S Come on, that's junk science at its worst.


I think the point you are trying to make is that it isn't as bad for you in regards to lung cancer as cigarettes. Great. When's the last time you heard of someone falling off a balcony because they lost their mind smoking Marlboros? :| It still does bad things to people, even though the altered state might be a good thing to some. :|
~Jaye
Do not believe that possibly you can escape the reward of your action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0