Recommended Posts
mr2mk1g 10
QuoteWe're thinning the herd of skydivers with 'tiny' hands & skinny 'fingers'...
So that's why there are so few chicks in the sport...
NovaTTT 2
QuoteNot so much packing as burble. Search around there are a few pictures floating around on this forum of knots-in-pilotchute/bridle, most are with standard hackeys. Should be a few in the wingsuit forum for sure.
Lazy or weak throws are not a function of the handle. Most handles, I've noticed, are hackeys, so that might have something to do with it. I don't see a connection between hackey and knot. What am I missing?
The best way to avoid PC issues, in my opinion, is to jump a pullout and have a strong throw.
dragon2 2
Pullout is a no-no for wingsuit jumps of course.
ciel bleu,
Saskia
NovaTTT 2
QuoteThe big problem with hackeys and other big-ish handles with wriggle room (= not stuck to the PC on 2 sides without slack in the attachmenttape) is that they flop around a lot while deploying (and of course a burble or PC in tow exacerbates this) thereby creating much more opportunity for knots.
Pullout is a no-no for wingsuit jumps of course.
I've found that the wiggle room or floppiness of the hackey or tube handle is the same and is easily dismissed through packing technique. It is my experience that an assertive pull and throw of the PC always gives good PC inflation and deployment.
My preference for the hackey is based on the feel of the grab; I find it fits into my hand with a natural feel and I have never had a problem with the grab, which I have had with both tubes and pud/pud-style handles. Maybe it's just my hackey which is not that big - slightly larger than a golf ball.
I agree that equipment should be examined, developed, improved, etc., but I believe that technique and skill has a greater effect on deployment than minor equipment differences.
around here, most people jump with a pud, some with the tubes. i'm pretty much a loner with my hackey actually. might be a european thing..
-Hunter S. Thompson
"No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try."
-Yoda
skydiverek 63
QuoteQuotei prefered the tube over the hackey actually, they're good and easy to grab, but too much snag-potential in my eyes, moving around in the plane and stuff..
There is a chance to have a knot from your hackey with the bridle over the PC. You may search for those pictures.
Attached. With PVC attached in TWO places (i.e. on PVC's ends), there simply is no space for the knot. The PVC lies flat on the PC.
hackish 8
In other news I was working on prototyping the other day and I came across a product called shapelock. It's a plastic that becomes soft in really hot (not boiling) water. I wanted to make a handle out of it since it is easy to mould into a comfortable hand grip but I'm afraid of putting it in a hot car. Oh well. Maybe stick some silly puddy in there.
-Michael
QuoteAttached. With PVC attached in TWO places (i.e. on PVC's ends), there simply is no space for the knot. The PVC lies flat on the PC.
Nice monkeyfist.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239
QuoteLast time out to the DZ, I went to deploy and stuck my finger in the deployment handle (tube type).
For some reason have you gotten muscle memory that is making you do that? I occasionally jump the drop zone's 160 and it has a tube thingy instead of a hackey. I've never been able to tell the difference at pull time. I just grab it like it's no different than the hackey.
The cork thing doesn't sound like a bad idea, but I'd ask a couple of riggers or something.
Jumped: Twin Otter, Cessna 182, CASA, Helicopter, Caravan
Not so much packing as burble. Search around there are a few pictures floating around on this forum of knots-in-pilotchute/bridle, most are with standard hackeys. Should be a few in the wingsuit forum for sure.
Ever see a BASE jumper put anything like a hackey on his/her pilotchute?
ciel bleu,
Saskia
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites