BETO74 0 #1 January 26, 2005 Anomaly??? Three men rented a hotel room, the room cost $30 divided by three is $10 a piece, the manager of the hotel felt he was overcharging the three men and decided to sent the bell boy with $5.00 back, so the cost of the room was $25. The bell boy decided on his way to the room to keep $2 to make it even so each of the three guest gets $1 back. So they pay $9x3guest = $27 plus $2 the bell boy kept $29…………………so where is the other dollar???? anyone http://web.mac.com/ac057a/iWeb/AC057A/H0M3.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2fat2fly 0 #2 January 26, 2005 AmEx user feesI am not the man. But the man knows my name...and he's worried Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueEyedMonster 0 #4 January 26, 2005 Hotel manager still has it Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
linny 1 #5 January 26, 2005 Quote So they pay $9x3guest = $27 plus $2 the bell boy kept $29…………………so where is the other dollar???? anyone Actually they paid 10 a guest, not 9. Your math is off dude. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pleifer 0 #6 January 26, 2005 Faulty logic $30 to start... bell boy takes 5 to give back... keeps two and give 3 back... so it is 30-3 (refund)- 2 (bell boy taketh)= $25 NOT 30-3+2=29 _________________________________________ The Angel of Duh has spoke Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kingbunky 3 #7 January 26, 2005 this one bugged me for a long time. if you look at where all the money is you get the correct total hotel $25 bellhop $2 guests $3 _______________ total $30 what you did is subtract the $3 the guests got back, then added the $2 from the bellboy back on. edited to add, doh! i type too slow!"Hang on a sec, the young'uns are throwin' beer cans at a golf cart." MB4252 TDS699 killing threads since 2001 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ccowden 0 #8 January 26, 2005 The room didn't cost $27, it cost $25 leaving $5 in change to split back amongst the 3 guys. But since the bellboy wanted to keep some, you are now splitting the $5 four ways, which works out to $1.25 each. If he gives back $1 to each of the three guys, he gets his $1.25 plus their .25 each equalling $2. $25 for the room, $5 in change= $30 no matter how you slice it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BETO74 0 #9 January 26, 2005 They pay $10 x 3 = 30 then the hotel manager sents back $5... right........... the bell boy kepts $2 and give back $3 so each of the 3 men paid $9 times 3 men equal $27 plus $2 the bell boy kept $29 get it?????http://web.mac.com/ac057a/iWeb/AC057A/H0M3.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
happythoughts 0 #10 January 26, 2005 If someone tells you, "A penny for your thoughts...", and you put in your "two cents worth", then someone is skimming a cent out of the middle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BETO74 0 #11 January 26, 2005 so... if the guest got back a dollar each did the hotel cost $9 a piece x 3 = 27??? instead of $10 each x 3 = $30http://web.mac.com/ac057a/iWeb/AC057A/H0M3.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdweller 0 #12 January 26, 2005 It's along the same line as counting to five with your first hand and counting backwards to 6 with your second hand and then adding the two numbers to get to 11 instead of 10------------------------------------------------------ "From the mightiest pharaoh to the lowliest peasant, who doesn't enjoy a good sit?" C. Montgomery Burns Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #13 January 26, 2005 It's not an anolamly, It's all down to the order of precedence of maths operators... + is done before - usually, to ensure that this happens in the order required you can add brackets (stuff in brackest done first). 30 - (3+2) = 25 where as (30 -3) + 2 = 29 (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BETO74 0 #14 January 26, 2005 You got it!!!http://web.mac.com/ac057a/iWeb/AC057A/H0M3.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #15 January 26, 2005 pleifer was there first .. and it dragged back a distant memory (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueEyedMonster 0 #16 January 26, 2005 QuoteIt's all down to the order of precedence of math's operators... I think ya missed the point. Order of precedence works great in a formula. But the anomaly exists because the events in the story problem occur contrary to the order of precedence. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites