0
Kennedy

Kerry makes sense here

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

Interesting double standard there Ron.

A whole bunch of people slam a guy who won a Silver Star and a Bronze Star in combat, questioning what he did and the way he did it, and we don't hear a peep from you.



Actually I have said several times Kerry IS a war hero. I slam the fact that he claims to have seen alll these bad things, but never STOPPED them from happening. If he was an officer he had a DUTY to stop them. And report them...Why is it the first time we hear of it is at Winter Soldier?

I also slam that he changes sides rather often.

For the record...Kerry IS a war hero in my eyes.



I didn't see you complain about these posts, just about mine:

www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=943982#943982 and

www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=943101#943101



Do go on whining about GWB not telling the truth and then whine when the truth is told about Kerry. Can't have it both ways.

How is whining about GWB's military record 32 years ago when we are engaged in a war today OK but presenting a different version of how KERRY contends he recieved his metals off limits?

I thought you were the "Seeker of Great Truths" Seems you don't want to confront the truth about Kerry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Interesting double standard there Ron.

A whole bunch of people slam a guy who won a Silver Star and a Bronze Star in combat, questioning what he did and the way he did it, and we don't hear a peep from you.



Actually I have said several times Kerry IS a war hero. I slam the fact that he claims to have seen alll these bad things, but never STOPPED them from happening. If he was an officer he had a DUTY to stop them. And report them...Why is it the first time we hear of it is at Winter Soldier?

I also slam that he changes sides rather often.

For the record...Kerry IS a war hero in my eyes.



I didn't see you complain about these posts, just about mine:

www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=943982#943982 and

www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=943101#943101



Do go on whining about GWB not telling the truth and then whine when the truth is told about Kerry. Can't have it both ways.

How is whining about GWB's military record 32 years ago when we are engaged in a war today OK but presenting a different version of how KERRY contends he recieved his metals off limits?

I thought you were the "Seeker of Great Truths" Seems you don't want to confront the truth about Kerry.



The posts I mentioned came from people who weren't there when Kerry won his medals. They were just supposition, not "truth". And Ron didn't make one peep of complaint about them. Ron only complained when I mentioned Alabama.

We all heard GWB lie in his State of the Union Addresses, and the President's Economic Report to the Nation is public record.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just found more Bush lies.

Economy was predicted to grow 3.8% in the last quarter of 2003 and it actually grew 4.1% Damn that lying piece of crap GWB.
Predictions are for 4.5% growth in the first quarter of 2004. That lying piece of crap Bush is probably lying about this too. It will probably be 4.9% or some other lie.

Investment in equipment and software was up 15.1% in the last quarter too. That lying piece of crap moron Bush only predicted 10%. More evidence Bush is an idiot and has no clue what he's doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Just found more Bush lies.

Economy was predicted to grow 3.8% in the last quarter of 2003 and it actually grew 4.1% Damn that lying piece of crap GWB.
Predictions are for 4.5% growth in the first quarter of 2004. That lying piece of crap Bush is probably lying about this too. It will probably be 4.9% or some other lie.

Investment in equipment and software was up 15.1% in the last quarter too. That lying piece of crap moron Bush only predicted 10%. More evidence Bush is an idiot and has no clue what he's doing.




Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Record setting deficit. Huge increase in government spending. And I thought you were a conservative.:P:P
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Just found more Bush lies.

Economy was predicted to grow 3.8% in the last quarter of 2003 and it actually grew 4.1% Damn that lying piece of crap GWB.
Predictions are for 4.5% growth in the first quarter of 2004. That lying piece of crap Bush is probably lying about this too. It will probably be 4.9% or some other lie.

Investment in equipment and software was up 15.1% in the last quarter too. That lying piece of crap moron Bush only predicted 10%. More evidence Bush is an idiot and has no clue what he's doing.




Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Record setting deficit. Huge increase in government spending. And I thought you were a conservative.:P:P



Well it took a while for GWB to fix the Clinton Recession, you know Sept. 11th and all, which by the way, wouldn't have happened if Clinton had any balls.
Normally businesses invest in equipment as a sign of expansion and then hire new employees when they are needed. Even an old Bush hater like you has to admit this is a good economic sign. Oh, that right, I forgot, you Libs need a bad economy with people out of work so you can get your pathetic Candidate elected and futher drag this country towards a nanny state.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Just found more Bush lies.

Economy was predicted to grow 3.8% in the last quarter of 2003 and it actually grew 4.1% Damn that lying piece of crap GWB.
Predictions are for 4.5% growth in the first quarter of 2004. That lying piece of crap Bush is probably lying about this too. It will probably be 4.9% or some other lie.

Investment in equipment and software was up 15.1% in the last quarter too. That lying piece of crap moron Bush only predicted 10%. More evidence Bush is an idiot and has no clue what he's doing.




Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Record setting deficit. Huge increase in government spending. And I thought you were a conservative.:P:P



Well it took a while for GWB to fix the Clinton Recession, you know Sept. 11th and all, which by the way, wouldn't have happened if Clinton had any balls.
Normally businesses invest in equipment as a sign of expansion and then hire new employees when they are needed. Even an old Bush hater like you has to admit this is a good economic sign. Oh, that right, I forgot, you Libs need a bad economy with people out of work so you can get your pathetic Candidate elected and futher drag this country towards a nanny state.



1. I am probably every bit as conservative as you claim to be in fiscal matters. Maybe more so.

2. I am not a Democrat

3. September 11 2001 was BEFORE Bush claimed the deficit would be small and short-term. Can't use that excuse. Not even a good try since you knew I knew that.

4. September 11 2001 was BEFORE Bush predicted 1.7M new jobs in 2003 but got negative 433,000. Can't use that excuse (see #3).
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The posts I mentioned came from people who weren't there when Kerry won his medals. They were just supposition, not "truth". And Ron didn't make one peep of complaint about them. Ron only complained when I mentioned Alabama.



You would not acknowledge the truth if it bit you in the ass. What I stated in the post you refer to is in fact the "truth". I do not like being called a liar. Unless you can establish you have any idea what did or did not happen in Viet Nam I suggest you keep your mouth shut about what the "truth" is. Did GWB steal you lunch money or what? Why would you carry so much hatred for one man?

You are really starting to go around the corner.
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The posts I mentioned came from people who weren't there when Kerry won his medals. They were just supposition, not "truth". And Ron didn't make one peep of complaint about them. Ron only complained when I mentioned Alabama.



You would not acknowledge the truth if it bit you in the ass. What I stated in the post you refer to is in fact the "truth". I do not like being called a liar. Unless you can establish you have any idea what did or did not happen in Viet Nam I suggest you keep your mouth shut about what the "truth" is. Did GWB steal you lunch money or what? Why would you carry so much hatred for one man?

You are really starting to go around the corner.



You've already told us that you did not witness the events that led to the award of Kerry's medals, yet you feel qualified to comment because you were in the country. I fail to see how you know anything about the circumstances of Kerry's injuries or medal winning behavior except by listening to the same people the rest of us listen to.

Maybe he's for real and maybe he's a fraud. Neither you nor I have anything except hearsay to go on.

As far as Bush is concerned, it is truly surprising to me that he can lie about so many things from government spending to WMDs to veterans benefits, yet all you right wingers continue to defend him. Don't you ever check to see whether he actually does what he says?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

The posts I mentioned came from people who weren't there when Kerry won his medals. They were just supposition, not "truth". And Ron didn't make one peep of complaint about them. Ron only complained when I mentioned Alabama.



You would not acknowledge the truth if it bit you in the ass. What I stated in the post you refer to is in fact the "truth". I do not like being called a liar. Unless you can establish you have any idea what did or did not happen in Viet Nam I suggest you keep your mouth shut about what the "truth" is. Did GWB steal you lunch money or what? Why would you carry so much hatred for one man?

You are really starting to go around the corner.



You've already told us that you did not witness the events that led to the award of Kerry's medals, yet you feel qualified to comment because you were in the country. I fail to see how you know anything about the circumstances of Kerry's injuries or medal winning behavior except by listening to the same people the rest of us listen to.

Maybe he's for real and maybe he's a fraud. Neither you nor I have anything except hearsay to go on.

As far as Bush is concerned, it is truly surprising to me that he can lie about so many things from government spending to WMDs to veterans benefits, yet all you right wingers continue to defend him. Don't you ever check to see whether he actually does what he says?



This is just my opinion but you need help. You read something and in your mind is says what ever you want it to say. You will argue it seems just to argue and if a thread does not have anything to argue about you will inject something into it. This may come a shock to you, but you are not the superior being you think you are. Some where in your life I will bet you were wrong about something. But I will also bet you would argue about it.
As far as being a right winger supporting Bush, you have no idea if I am a conservative, moderate or a liberal. You don't know me well enough to make that distinction. But of course you don't need fact to label someone do you.
I have said this before and you have choose to ignore it. No where have I posted in support of Bush or questioned Kerry's actions in combat. I have questioned other peoples descriptions of what happened. I do attack his behavior on his return from Viet Nam. For that I call him a lying piece of shit. Now would you like to address that issue or are you going to continue charging blindly along ignoring anything that does not fit into your attack on GWB and his family back three generations?
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Just found more Bush lies.

Economy was predicted to grow 3.8% in the last quarter of 2003 and it actually grew 4.1% Damn that lying piece of crap GWB.
Predictions are for 4.5% growth in the first quarter of 2004. That lying piece of crap Bush is probably lying about this too. It will probably be 4.9% or some other lie.

Investment in equipment and software was up 15.1% in the last quarter too. That lying piece of crap moron Bush only predicted 10%. More evidence Bush is an idiot and has no clue what he's doing.



Hey, just so you know, those figures aren't given or signed off on by the president. So wrong or right, in good or bad ways, has nothing to do with what he says.

Never go to a DZ strip show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You've already told us that you did not witness the events that led to the award of Kerry's medals, yet you feel qualified to comment because you were in the country.


Um, sorry, Kallend. I must've missed the memo that said you were there, and that you witnessed what happened, and therefore know far more about what happened in than those who are posting and who were in 'Nam.

Can you resend the memo? I'd appreciate it.

Ciels-
Michele


~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Just found more Bush lies.

Economy was predicted to grow 3.8% in the last quarter of 2003 and it actually grew 4.1% Damn that

Quote

lying piece of crap GWB.
Predictions are for 4.5% growth in the first quarter of 2004. That lying piece of crap Bush is probably lying about this too. It will probably be 4.9% or some other lie.

Investment in equipment and software was up 15.1% in the last quarter too. That lying piece of crap moron Bush only predicted 10%. More evidence Bush is an idiot and has no clue what he's doing.




Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Record setting deficit. Huge increase in government spending. And I thought you were a conservative.:P:P



Well it took a while for GWB to fix the Clinton Recession, you know Sept. 11th and all, which by the way, wouldn't have happened if Clinton had any balls.
Normally businesses invest in equipment as a sign of expansion and then hire new employees when they are needed. Even an old Bush hater like you has to admit this is a good economic sign. Oh, that right, I forgot, you Libs need a bad economy with people out of work so you can get your pathetic Candidate elected and futher drag this country towards a nanny state.



1. I am probably every bit as conservative as you claim to be in fiscal matters. Maybe more so.
Quote



Going by your postings here, I really doubt it.

2. I am not a Democrat
Quote



Oh, right, let me guess, an Independent (which is a BS word Libs like to hide behind because they are afraid to admit what they are.)


3. September 11 2001 was BEFORE Bush claimed the deficit would be small and short-term. Can't use that excuse. Not even a good try since you knew I knew that.
Quote



Just another example of your blind agenda. Go back and read what I actually said. I said first Bush had to fix the Clinton Recessesion. Sept 11 happened while he was in the process. I never said that was the only reason.

4. September 11 2001 was BEFORE Bush predicted 1.7M new jobs in 2003 but got negative 433,000. Can't use that excuse (see #3).



And the economy has been whacky since then with no economists being able to predict accurately what's going to happen from quarter to quarter. The President has an obligation to at least forcast whatb his economic advisors are telling him. Too bad that cave you live in blinds you to the world of reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You've already told us that you did not witness the events that led to the award of Kerry's medals, yet you feel qualified to comment because you were in the country.


Um, sorry, Kallend. I must've missed the memo that said you were there, and that you witnessed what happened, and therefore know far more about what happened in than those who are posting and who were in 'Nam.

Can you resend the memo? I'd appreciate it.

Ciels-
Michele



Well, Michele, I can give you a recommendation for a good remedial reading instructor.

I have consistently counseled skepticism in believing these claims. Nowhere did I claim to know what was going on. In fact I specifically stated just a few posts ago:

"Maybe he's for real and maybe he's a fraud. Neither you nor I have anything except hearsay to go on."


How do you interpret that to suggest that I know what went on, Michele?

It's not like I said "We know where they are" (Rumsfeld), or anything like that, is it?

Perhaps you remember that just a year ago I counseled skepticism over believing the White House statements over Iraq's WMDs. You disagreed (links available on request). Sometimes skepticism is the wise course.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well, Michele, I can give you a recommendation for a good remedial reading instructor.


No thanks. I didn't even go to college, so obviously I'm dumber than dirt.

If you are not willing to listen to someone who was incountry, who knows what it's like, who was there, then there's no hope for you. There are many stories out there, and I would suggest you do some independent research on what to believe before you tell me to be skeptical. I was - and I researched. What he received medals for, others would simply stick a bandaid on and go on.

When you look at Kerry in perspective, his whole life, and his whole goal, then you will be able to discuss him with some basis in reality. Further, if you're so intent on skepticism, and not believing anything until incontrovertible proof is tendered, then you need to start retracting your rhetoric on Bush and lying.

Oh, sorry. I'm not supposed to use the word "rhetoric". That's surely above my reading comprehension level.

Ciels-
Michele


~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



I have said this before and you have choose to ignore it. No where have I posted in support of Bush or questioned Kerry's actions in combat. I have questioned other peoples descriptions of what happened. I do attack his behavior on his return from Viet Nam. For that I call him a lying piece of shit. Now would you like to address that issue or are you going to continue charging blindly along ignoring anything that does not fit into your attack on GWB and his family back three generations?



That's funny, I thought you wrote:
"If he ever drove a river boat it was a short joy ride. Officers don't drive. And I would be surprised if he spent more than 10 days during the whole 4 months on opps. or on patrol. Again, officers did not drive."

You also wrote "His performance was not extraordinary"

And
"And just to keep the record straight, a tour of duty in Viet Nam was 12 months, 13 for Marines, not four. Who wrote Kerry a hall pass to go back to the world early?"

Now, that sure looks to me like questioning his Vietnam experience.

As far as generations of Bushes are concerned, his grandfather DID trade with the Nazis - that is a fact.
I don't think I have said anything at all about George HW, in fact I rather like him. And GWB is a liar, although your sig line suggests you have been taken in by him.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

You've already told us that you did not witness the events that led to the award of Kerry's medals, yet you feel qualified to comment because you were in the country.


Um, sorry, Kallend. I must've missed the memo that said you were there, and that you witnessed what happened, and therefore know far more about what happened in than those who are posting and who were in 'Nam.

Can you resend the memo? I'd appreciate it.

Ciels-
Michele



Well, Michele, I can give you a recommendation for a good remedial reading instructor.

I have consistently counseled skepticism in believing these claims. Nowhere did I claim to know what was going on. In fact I specifically stated just a few posts ago:

"Maybe he's for real and maybe he's a fraud. Neither you nor I have anything except hearsay to go on."


How do you interpret that to suggest that I know what went on, Michele?

It's not like I said "We know where they are" (Rumsfeld), or anything like that, is it?

Perhaps you remember that just a year ago I counseled skepticism over believing the White House statements over Iraq's WMDs. You disagreed (links available on request). Sometimes skepticism is the wise course.



Your arrogance is shining through. Not a personal attack, just a statement of fact.
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you understood what went on in Viet Nam you would be able to tell the difference between facts on how thing were done and questioning one mans personal actions. You are very good at cut/paste just those things you feel will make you appear in the right. The fact is, you do not have any idea what Kerry did in the military, you were never in the military, and you have no idea if Bush lied or not because you do not know everything that he knows. Everything you have said on the subject is pure speculation on your part or something you read in the media. But you ego will not let you see anything except, "I am right and everybody else is wrong". You have failed completely to address the issue of Kerry's action after he returned. Why is that?
You have not seen the ball since the kick off and I am done with you.
My idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If you understood what went on in Viet Nam you would be able to tell the difference between facts on how thing were done and questioning one mans personal actions. You are very good at cut/paste just those things you feel will make you appear in the right.

Quote



If you don't want to be quoted, don't write the stuff.
I didn't quote anything out of context. You're just pissed that you were caught contradicting yourself.




The fact is, you do not have any idea what Kerry did in the military, you were never in the military,



I have not claimed to know what went on. I have questioned the claims of others to know what Kerry did when they weren't there. I have explicitly stated that I don't know what Kerry did in that boat, and neither do you. I wrote:

"Maybe he's for real and maybe he's a fraud. Neither you nor I have anything except hearsay to go on."

You completely misrepresent what I write and then attack me for it. Your attacks on me in this thread ARE personal attacks.



and you have no idea if Bush lied or not because you do not know everything that he knows.
Quote



I know we have a record deficit when he said we wouldn't. I know unemployment has risen when he said it wouldn't. I know no WMDs have been reported to have been found, when he said he knew where they are. I know Bush's budget cut back veterans benefits right after he said how important it is to support veterans. I know he spoke about Iraq's capability to deploy WMDs in 45 minutes when the CIA had previously stated that the report was false.

Quote




Everything you have said on the subject is pure speculation on your part or something you read in the media.

Quote



But your attacks on Kerry come from personal knowledge? Like evidence that would stand up in court? Really?




But you ego will not let you see anything except, "I am right and everybody else is wrong". You have failed completely to address the issue of Kerry's action after he returned. Why is that?
You have not seen the ball since the kick off and I am done with you.



I haven't addressed Kerry's actions after he returned because I have been addressing something else.

I don't even like Kerry! I would prefer Edwards over either Kerry or Bush.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Well, Michele, I can give you a recommendation for a good remedial reading instructor.


No thanks. I didn't even go to college, so obviously I'm dumber than dirt.

If you are not willing to listen to someone who was incountry, who knows what it's like, who was there, then there's no hope for you. There are many stories out there, and I would suggest you do some independent research on what to believe before you tell me to be skeptical. I was - and I researched. What he received medals for, others would simply stick a bandaid on and go on.

When you look at Kerry in perspective, his whole life, and his whole goal, then you will be able to discuss him with some basis in reality. Further, if you're so intent on skepticism, and not believing anything until incontrovertible proof is tendered, then you need to start retracting your rhetoric on Bush and lying.

Oh, sorry. I'm not supposed to use the word "rhetoric". That's surely above my reading comprehension level.

Ciels-
Michele



One step at a time, Michele. Right now I'm working on the claims that his medals were undeserved or his actions in Vietnam were somehow inappropriate (see previous posts for links). And so far as I can see, the people making those claims weren't actually there either. If you were 10 miles away or 10,000 miles away, you don't know what happened.

Now if one of his boat crew steps up and says it was all a lie, that will be different.

Remember a couple of weeks ago we had a faked picture of Kerry with Jane Fonda, then we had a faked report of an affair. Skepticism is in order.

But I and millions of others heard Bush talk about uranium from Niger and small budget deficits with our own ears. Many of Bush's untruths are in the public record, no skepticism necessary (just denial if you a a Bush supporter).
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



snip


Well it took a while for GWB to fix the Clinton Recession, you know Sept. 11th and all, which by the way, wouldn't have happened if Clinton had any balls.
Normally businesses invest in equipment as a sign of expansion and then hire new employees when they are needed. Even an old Bush hater like you has to admit this is a good economic sign. Oh, that right, I forgot, you Libs need a bad economy with people out of work so you can get your pathetic Candidate elected and futher drag this country towards a nanny state.



1. I am probably every bit as conservative as you claim to be in fiscal matters. Maybe more so.
Quote



Going by your postings here, I really doubt it.

Quote



Really? Show me where I have argued in favor of affirmative action or slavery reparations or bigger government or gun control or an unbalanced budget. or letting criminals go because they had a difficult childhood. Go over my posts and you'll find they are VERY consistent in arguing against government intrusion.






2. I am not a Democrat
Quote



Oh, right, let me guess, an Independent (which is a BS word Libs like to hide behind because they are afraid to admit what they are.)



Lifetime, paid up member of the "Conservative Party":P
Quote




3. September 11 2001 was BEFORE Bush claimed the deficit would be small and short-term. Can't use that excuse. Not even a good try since you knew I knew that.
Quote



Just another example of your blind agenda. Go back and read what I actually said. I said first Bush had to fix the Clinton Recessesion. Sept 11 happened while he was in the process. I never said that was the only reason.

Quote



HE made the speech. HE made the claim. The record deficits are in HIS budgets that HE proposes, with HIS spending increases and HIS tax (revenue)cuts. The Congress is Republican, you can't blame that either.




4. September 11 2001 was BEFORE Bush predicted 1.7M new jobs in 2003 but got negative 433,000. Can't use that excuse (see #3).



And the economy has been whacky since then with no economists being able to predict accurately what's going to happen from quarter to quarter. The President has an obligation to at least forcast whatb his economic advisors are telling him. Too bad that cave you live in blinds you to the world of reality.



Feeble excuse for an outcome totally at variance with his report's prediction just 11 months previous. His signature is on the report. Where does the buck stop?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Your arrogance is shining through. Not a personal attack, just a statement of fact.



But it''s OK for you to write:

"Go buy a GWB doll, sit in the corner, play with your lip and punch the doll.

and

"You should go buy the doll"


You're allowed to make personal attacks with impunity, it seems.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Having a few conservative positions does not make you a conservative. You admit you like Edwards better than Kerry. Twiddle Dee and Twiddle Dum.

Question: If GWB predicts a growth in the economy of say 3% and it actually grows by 5%, do you still consider him a liar?



He has little control over that. He has a lot of control over the deficit. His initiatives reduced revenues and increased expenditures. He has control over what he says about veterans' benefits and over what he does about veterans' benefits. He has control over the Office of Special Plans and whether or not the USA invades another nation.

Bush is not a conservative. He does not espouse conservative values although he says he does. He is a tool of the far right.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mike, I'm still following this thread with interest, especially as the first one is now locked down.

It's unfortunate that political debate in an election year has to take such a nasty turn with so many personal remarks flying back & forth.

My biggest problem with the ex-Green Beret's letter is that I don't know whether the letter itself or the allegations it contains are real or something someone fabricated to spew out on the web. You not only can't believe everything you read on the web, you shouldn't as a matter of course until you've read it from enough different sources to weigh the facts and use some sound judgement.

For the record, I've never served in the military. I was a senior in high school when the Paris Accords were signed and the US pulled out of Vietnam - a VERY RELIEVED senior at that. I did regiszter for the draft and carried a draft card (1-H, a general holding category, as Selective Service's statutory authority to conscript draftees had expired).

I am old enough to recall John Kerry leading the VVAW demonstrations in Washington. 1971 was a time when just about everyone, including a lot of servicemen, had turned against the war. Why ? Well, Nixon was gradually withdrawing American forces, while Henry Kissinger and the North Viets were dawdling away the time in Paris. Everyone knew the war was going to end sooner or later, so who the hell wanted to get killed anymore in a war that was essentially over, except that they were still there and still being killed ? Things had gone really sour by then, this is when the dope, racial problems and fragging of officers was rampant. It was not at all the military that had been serving just 3-4 years earlier.

As for the atrocities, it's a pretty well established fact that they happened. The only conviction that ever came out of the entire war was Lt. William Calley, who Nixon rescued from the brig to serve his time under house arrest. The other senator/governor Kerrey, from Nebraska, has personally confessed to participating in a massacre of civilians while serving as a Navy SEAL officer. That stuff happened. I've talked to friends, some of them skydivers, who told me they personally mowed down farmers plowing their fields as they flew by in helicopters. They didn't do it because they were evil, or because America was evil. They did it because they were young kids, stressed near the breaking point in a war they just wanted to live through at the far end of the world. There's no logic to this kind of stuff, it's the dark - or some would say "sinful" - side of human nature. It's what war does to people - or so I've been told by those who were there, as I've never been so unlucky myself.

This doesn't negate the good stuff that happened either. American GI's have been famous for treating the sick and wounded, for feeding starving refugees, for building schools and clinics in war zones. That good stuff happened too, though I bet it happened a lot more in the optimististic days of the sixties than in the end game of the seventies.

I don't know how many months John Kerry served in Vietnam. I do know that he was wounded three times, maybe that had something to do with his early return. But the riverboat Navy was one of the most dangerous of combat assignments in the war and those guys took some of the highest casualties of the war. They were sitting ducks. And if the bullets didn't get them, the Agent Orange did, like the way it sickened and killed Admiral Elmo Zumwalt's own son, who was another riverboat commander. There is a guy stumping for Kerry who was a SEAL who was blown off the deck in an action where Kerry was already wounded. Kerry turned the boat around and went back, under fire, to rescue the guy. Though he's a registered Republican, this guy is out stumping for Kerry, as are some other men who served with or under him.

It's also well worth noting that Kerry wasn't drafted - he enlisted in the Navy and volunteered for Vietnam because he felt it was his duty to serve. This was something almost unheard of among his social class, especially as the war was already becoming unpopular. This alone says something about the man.

As for Bush's Guard service, I had a friend, Fred, who also went into the Guard to beat the draft. He also skipped over a long waiting list, possibly because his day was an Asst. District Attny. Also because his dad was unhappy with the way his oldest son Bob had returned from Vietnam with a drug habit and decided that one son in the war was enough for him. The Guard nowadays gets mobilized, they serve and fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. Back then they didn't. They were a pretty safe bet for staying out of the draft and out of the war. I don't hold it against Bush anymore than against my friend Fred for taking the Guard as a way out. But Fred doesn't get up and lie to Congress, nor does he run around masquerading as a jet pilot onboard aircraft carriers. It's Bush's latter day "wannabee"-ism that really bugs me. That and Dick Cheney's answer to where he was during the Vietnam years. Cheney "had other priorities" - his own words.

So here we are, it's an election year. I'm voting with all my heart for a Kerry ticket, that I hope will include John Edwards in the no. 2 slot. I'm an American and I think Bush is bad for the country and has got to go and I intend to vote that way. And I can say that to you Mike because I know you and just met up with you a few weeks ago for the first time in 24 years and I know you're a good man.

Let's all just be thankful that we change or keep our leaders with our votes and not with tanks or rioting mobs in the street, like the shit that's going on in Haiti at this very moment. Even in the middle of our own Civil War, we held a presidential election. Lincoln insisted on it and he ran against one of his own generals who ran on a peace platform. Lincoln knew the whole war was pointless without our basic freedoms at home. So it is now.

Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
T, I can't help but state that what you wrote is wonderful. Not because I agree with you (I don't, not completely), but because you took the time to state your personal position, without personal attack, without arrogance, without putting anyone else down for their position, and without insinuating that they are stupid if they don't agree with you.

I understand your position - again, understanding does not equate with agreement - and really, really appreciate the time and care you took to state your thoughts and reasoning...

Thanks very much!

Ciels-
Michele


~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0