Recommended Posts
bmcd308 0
I like that your link describes Joe Lieberman as a "well-known conservative" Democrat.
No wonder they think everyone is right wing.
----------------------------------
www.jumpelvis.com
No wonder they think everyone is right wing.
----------------------------------
www.jumpelvis.com
kallend 2,106
Fox news is the most twisted and perverse news station, If they can call themselves news, more corporate propoganda. The station itself makes me sick, but the people who buy into this pile of shit make me even more ill.
Fox news is for the same people who enjoy Jerry Springer and Ricky Lake.. It's News entertainment for the weak minded
Rather than throwing your little bomb, why don't you try backing up what you say with a little information? You could take a story from Fox as an example and then compare it to a story from another Television News source to show how Fox embellished the story to exploit its entertainment value the way Springer or Lake do. My suggestion would be to try and find a story on MSNBC since they never exploit a news story for its' entertainment value. Then your opinion would have a little substance and you wouldn't appear to be what you accuse those who watch Fox of being.
What is your hypothesis for the well documented observation that FOX viewers are far more likely to have incorrect "knowledge" of current affairs than those who get their news from other mainstream media sources? And don't just ask for a link, it's been given on DZ.COM over and over again.
I have 2 hypotheses, and I don't know which is more likely correct: 1. FOX deliberately slants their presentation to lead viewers astray, and (2) Weak-minded individuals self-select to watch FOX in the same way they flock to other Murdoch media.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
souleh 0
I have a flag on my lapel. I must be right
I have no problem with that.. patriotism (sp?) is a good thing, having pride and respect for your country. But at the same time, I do believe that news reporters should provide an un-biased and impartial view of the world's news, providing facts and not fiction..
I do agree that the BBC attacked this from a personal angle - the BBC as an entity itself dug it's fingers in over this situation.. however, from watching the BBC news reports of it, it was still shown in an impartial light.
And as far as I know, the director general of the BBC has resigned over the issue, showing that he does realise there were issues with the way they acted over it.
But hey, this is media, right? News or not, I guess they still want to get most viewers. From what I can tell of Fox, they target their news at a certain audience (perhaps not those who read the FT/wallstreet journal?) - in an attempt to get most viewers. That's understandable.. although I do have issues with the way they tailor the news content to suit this approach.
Perhaps I'm being a 'dumb brit'??

![[:/] [:/]](/uploads/emoticons/dry.png)
'buttplugs? where?' - geno
Skyrad 0
How did the Hutton enquiry become a debate over wether the BBC was Anti American? Surely this is egocentricity on a massive scale by Fox news. Actualy I thought the coverage on whole was acurate and non biased. But maybe that was the problem...
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Fox news is the most twisted and perverse news station, If they can call themselves news, more corporate propoganda. The station itself makes me sick, but the people who buy into this pile of shit make me even more ill.
Fox news is for the same people who enjoy Jerry Springer and Ricky Lake.. It's News entertainment for the weak minded
Rather than throwing your little bomb, why don't you try backing up what you say with a little information? You could take a story from Fox as an example and then compare it to a story from another Television News source to show how Fox embellished the story to exploit its entertainment value the way Springer or Lake do. My suggestion would be to try and find a story on MSNBC since they never exploit a news story for its' entertainment value. Then your opinion would have a little substance and you wouldn't appear to be what you accuse those who watch Fox of being.
What is your hypothesis for the well documented observation that FOX viewers are far more likely to have incorrect "knowledge" of current affairs than those who get their news from other mainstream media sources? And don't just ask for a link, it's been given on DZ.COM over and over again.
I have 2 hypotheses, and I don't know which is more likely correct: 1. FOX deliberately slants their presentation to lead viewers astray, and (2) Weak-minded individuals self-select to watch FOX in the same way they flock to other Murdoch media.
The data is obviously flawed. Does it assume people only watch Fox News? Suppose they watch Fox News and MSNBC and read WSJ how were they catagorized. What if someone watches MSNBC 51% of the time and Fox News 49% of the time? How is that accounted for?
I think anyone who only gets their news from only one source is weak minded or ignorant. I know very few people who do.
http://www.fair.org/reports/fox-cnn-guest-list.html
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites