skreamer 1
jdhill 0
Quotehe has the same rights that we do.
Not when he is speaking in an official capacity (i.e. in uniform - as a general)... then he is speaking for the governement, and must spout the party line. If he were in a suit and tie, as Mr. Boykin, then yes he could say what every he wanted...
You give up a lot of rights when you put on that uniform... you are the defender of democracy, not the practicer therof.
Someone with his credentials should know that.
J
juanesky 0
Quoteand is attacked by the liberals when he tries to exercise his rights. Agree with his views or not, he has the same rights that we do.
only the left has the right to free speech according to some. He has a right to his own opinion and a right to express it. If Ted Kennedy can spread his bs then, no one should have trouble with Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin comments.
wmw999 2,442
QuoteAgree with his views or not, he has the same rights that we do.
He has the same individual rights. He also has the same work responsibilities as the rest of us, even us stupid low-life liberal lefties you like to slam.
If I were to make, in my official capacity (I have one), a statement about the shuttle program, I would very possibly be canned. I would certainly be given a very stern talking to. That is what I would expect to happen to him, since he made a very incautious statement in his official capacity.
We are not in a war against terrorism because we are Christian and Jewish and they are Muslims. That was the implication of what he said. We were attacked by a group of religious extremists, in the name of their religion. When Jim Jones had several hundred people commit suicide in Guyana, no one accused Christianity of causing that -- it was an individual perversion. So was 9/11.
As long as we choose not to understand people who claim to be our foes, they will remain our foes. They might remain our foes if we do understand them, but it's a dead certainty if we don't.
Once we give someone the respect to try to understand them, it's much easier not to group them all together and assume "they" are all alike.
Oh, and exposing a CIA agent to punish her husband is not freedom of speech, either.
Wendy W.
DJL 235
QuoteWell, if you ask those that are "terrorists" that are waging a "jihad" against us, you'll note that most of them will say that it is a holy war against us, infidels, because of the very culture we have, which is built upon...anyone...anyone...Judeo-Christian values! Don't get guilty about it people. For a minute if you think that Gen. Boykin's comments are going to inflame anything in the middle east, look again.
So, since they're making it a holy war then we should too? REMEMBER it's not Islam we're going after, it's terrorists.
This guy is an idiot. He should not have this position because by speaking publicly in uniform like this he's assuming the role of a policy maker. This policy does not represent the views of Americans. We're all idiots if we let him keep this position.
skreamer 1
QuoteYep, and maybe also they don't like us because we drink of legal age, and can pursuit a career on porn...
Wow, you win.
QuoteNot when he is speaking in an official capacity (i.e. in uniform - as a general)... then he is speaking for the governement, and must spout the party line.
I disagree. Just because he is in uniform does not mean he is in "official capacity ". If the president went to a prayer breakfast in a suit would he have to " spout the party line."
I don't think so!
juanesky 0
QuoteSo, since they're making it a holy war then we should too?
We should probably say "holy shit" and wait?
And right now someone in the Middle East is probably thinking 'They don't like us because we're not fat'.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites