0
alpha

Iraq? It's the Oil, Stupid!

Recommended Posts

Quote

Well his dad should have taken care of it the
first time there wouldnt have to be a re-run...Whos
running this country is it our president,or our
presidents father...Go son..fix daddys fuck ups...
make me proud



Oooh...that's a good one. You do know of course that was not the UN mandate (you're for supporting the UN aren't you?). And, your good buddy Al Gore is on record of the floor of the US Senate in 1991 as being in favor of the course of action G.H.W. Bush took. Your facts are incorrect.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>And finally, wouldn't such a war do wonders for the US economy,
> which one couldn't really call great at the moment?

Unemployment is relatively low. Car and home sales are booming. The stock market isn't dropping any more. Apparently we can afford a massive tax cut. I'd say the economy's not in bad shape; could be better, but are you really willing to say that the deaths of, say, 50,000 Iraqis is justified if 5% of americans can get a bigger TV?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As far as I can tell, there isn't any reliable evidence showing a significant payout or support by Saddam Hussein of the type of terrorism that attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. There isn't any reliable evidence showing governmental support by Iraq of Al-Qaeda.

We'd like there to be, because it would justify a war. We imagine he must be happy, because as far as we can tell he doesn't like America.

But Iraq is more secular than a lot of countries, and some of the worst terrorism is religion based. Because it's a lot easier to do awful things if you think God is telling you to.

Wendy W.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Greater good for the entire world enough reason?

Pray that we don't use that reason, because the US is currently the most dangerous country on earth.

>The dictator kills his own people in many different ways. Including
> mass death with weapons of mass destruction when he killed
> thousands with gas.

We supported him militarily while he did that. It's a little late to claim that now it's not OK.

>Some people make it sound like the U.S. is going to conquer Iraq
> and all the oil and keep it for ourselves.

We appointed a former Unocal consultant to be leader of Afghanistan. Think we're not going to do the same in Iraq? And think he's really not going to be partial to US oil companies?

We don't want to own Iraq, we just want them to sell us really, really cheap oil in huge quantities forever. Again, that would be really nice, but not worth even one death, much less 50,000.

>When in reality, the U.S. and the rest of the U.N. will help a new Iraq
> government sell the oil at a fair market price to the rest of the world
> and use that money on building a better country for the Iraqi
> people.

Oh please. Tell that to the Indians that Union Carbide "helped" with their chemical plant, or to the people of Nigeria who are dirt poor and who work on the oil rigs there. Someone is making tons of money; it sure ain't the locals, and never will be.

>People also say "Give the U.N. inspectors more time". Who's not
> giving them more time? Don't you think it would be wise to let The
> Inspectors do their thing and have the military build up? If it was
> not for the military build up Saddam would not of let the inspectors
> back in. Progress is being made.

If he indeed does hold off until inspections are completed, and abides by their findings, I will be the first to congratulate him on a job well done. However, in the past week, Powell has said that if the inspectors don't find anything, that's sufficient cause for war. Bush himself said that if they don't turn anything over, they're in violation. A few days later, an administration spokesman said that handing over empty warheads voluntarily should not be mistaken as cooperation. Apparently, any move by Iraq, no matter what it is, is yet another argument for an invasion.

I hope all this is just saber rattling, because it sure sounds like the groundwork is being laid for an invasion no matter what the outcome of inspections. I hope that's not the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just want to point out that this is a completely skewed statistic:

Quote

In the US, where more than 60 per cent of the recoverable oil has already been produced, the ratio is just 10 years



Not even close to reality. People with agendas were saying in the 70s that we only had 10 years of oil left as well.

Be on guard when you see anything like this that is loaded with statistics. Double check all facts. A good author will cite sources - check those sources, then check others as well. Remember that many people that publish also have an agenda. Doubt first, and ask questions.
Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To the tune of "If you're happy and you know it, clap your hands"...

If you cannot find Osama, bomb Iraq.
If the markets are a drama, bomb Iraq.
If the terrorists are frisky,
Pakistan is looking shifty,
North Korea is too risky,
Bomb Iraq.

If we have no allies with us, bomb Iraq.
If we think someone has dissed us, bomb Iraq.
So to hell with the inspections,
Let's look tough for the elections,
Close your mind and take directions,
Bomb Iraq.

It's "pre-emptive non-aggression", bomb Iraq.
Let's prevent this mass destruction, bomb Iraq.
They've got weapons we can't see,
And that's good enough for me
'Cos it's all the proof I need
Bomb Iraq.

If you never were elected, bomb Iraq.
If your mood is quite dejected, bomb Iraq.
If you think Saddam's gone mad,
With the weapons that he had,
(And he tried to kill your dad),
Bomb Iraq.

If your corporate fraud is growin', bomb Iraq.
If your ties to it are showin', bomb Iraq.
If your politics are sleazy,
And hiding that ain't easy,
And your manhood's getting queasy,
Bomb Iraq.

Fall in line and follow orders, bomb Iraq.
For our might knows not our borders, bomb Iraq.
Disagree? We'll cal! l it treason,
Let's make war not love this season,

Even if we have no reason,

Bomb Iraq.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well his dad should have taken care of it the
first time there wouldnt have to be a re-run



As a fact G.Bush Senior did take care of it, Kuwait is free of Iraq and that was the objective of Desert Storm, The reason he did not go after Saddam is because he showed compassion and mercy on the Iraqi people, Both compassion and mercy are great traits you find in a good leader but on the other hand you must be fair and strong. And he was all the above.


------Have a good one!--------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Sorry dude,but I dont support any politician/war
monger....



Yet, you say that G.H.W. Bush should have finished the job and removed Saddam, exceeding UN resolutions? Granted, we'd still piss off the world, but when are they not teed off at us for one reason or another? :S

Personally, I think time is on our side as far as military options go, and I would like to see a presentation similar to what Adlai Stevenson did during the Cuban missle crisis (whether to the UN or the world at large, I don't care). Having said/wrote that, we and the world have been more than patient, and we can no longer simply hope it will go away with appeasement and diplomacy (it didn't work with Iraq, DPRK or Vietnam).
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
***The difference is that we claim we're right. Which may be, but don't forget that they think they're right***

I completely understand that..and I am probably biased since I am married to someone who is in the military and hear their reasonings behind it all. I can't debate about all of this as I do not know all of the facts of which you stated. I do not want war....however...if that's what it comes to..I will support it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Some people make it sound like the U.S. is going to conquer Iraq and all the oil and keep it for ourselves.
When in reality, the U.S. and the rest of the U.N. will help a new Iraq government sell the oil at a fair market price to the rest of the world and use that money on building a better country for the Iraqi people.


Such noble cause! Too bad a lot of those Iraqi people will be killed in the event of an attack and even more of them will die in the aftermath of the war. The U.N. estimates the number of direct and indirect casualties of a US attack would be around 500.000. That's half a million people, most of whom are not soldiers, who will die because of bombs, lack of food, lack of water and diseases for which no cures will be available (it is estimated the Iraqi supply of medicines will last for about four months in the event of a war). And more than 20 million people will for more than a year afterwards rely only on humanitarian help. And believe it or not, those millions WILL hate the US for destroying their country, fucked up as it is.

Quote

People say that we are rushing to war, I don't understand this. The U.S. and U.N. have been trying to deal with this madman for well over 11 years. Thats not a rush if you ask me.


If you ask me, any war that could with more time/effort be avoided is rushed.

Quote

People also say "Give the U.N. inspectors more time". Who's not giving them more time? Don't you think it would be wise to let The Inspectors do their thing and have the military build up? If it was not for the military build up Saddam would not of let the inspectors back in. Progress is being made.


See above. I agree that the military build-up has contributed to Saddam letting the inspectors back in, but further building up might cause him to think the attack will happen regardless of what he allows them to inspect. A 'preemptive strike' by Saddam on the US with womd (if he indeed has any) that might happen in this case would be, in my opinion, an irony par excellence. It would also be stupid, but if he's anything like you picture him (and I do hope he's not entirely like that), well, he just might pull it off.

Quote

George W. Bush has been doing a great job so far on this matter and I stand behind him proudly.


This is a matter of political principles, so I won't try to argue with you on this specific subject. Just remember that by supporting him you will be indirectly responsible for the deaths of half a million people if the war starts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The U.N. estimates the number of direct and indirect casualties of a US attack would be around 500.000.



This is the same organization which appointed Libya to chair the Human Rights Committee (or Commission) for the UN. The UN has lost its value.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

you will be indirectly responsible for the deaths of half a million people if the war starts.




Surely not... "All we have to do is kiclk in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse";). That's if our boots don't melt first:D.

Mike.

Taking the piss out of the FrenchAmericans since before it was fashionable.

Prenait la pisse hors du FrançaisCanadiens méridionaux puisqu'avant lui à la mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
unless you've visited the middle eastern countries and europe lately, i can't see how anyone who hasn't can form an intelligent decision on this matter. i'm not trying to flame here, but believe me, good, bad or indifferent if we attack Iraq, more buildings will fall, more innocent people from all nations will die. our sons and daughters will die, we may even die ourselves. personally, although i voted for him, i'm not willing to die for ol wyubya. he's still miffed because of 09/11 let's face it, that made us look foolish and idiotic, we got caught with our pants down just like we did during pearl harbor. which is just when a weaker country will strike because they are no match militarily. they have no other recourse than to use cheap weapons of mass destruction, and they're not going to play fair...trust me. i'll be in Bahrain on the 24th, i'm going there knowing the citizens there hate me, and would love to kill me, believe me, it's no fun being a minority. these people have NOTHING, it would not hurt their feelings to make our country look exactly like theirs. i hope we can reach a diplomatic ageement, if not, let the killing begin, don't fly anywhere, and lock up your children, and if you work in a high rise building, quit your job. think of the impact attacking Iraq would have, Saddaam will blow up more oil wells as well, you dont think they dont have C-4 strapped to them right now? they do, and this is fact, not rhetoric. it's not worth it this time, unless we're willing to "go for broke" visit Here for a different perspective. bookmark this site and stay better informed. i know what i read in the papers over there, and what i read in the papers over here ain't the same thing all the time, well 90% of the time anyways.
--Richard--
"We Will Not Be Shaken By Thugs, And Terroist"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The reason he did not go after Saddam is because he showed compassion and mercy on the Iraqi people,



Really? Because in the interview I saw of GB, Sr. on the history channel special about the Gulf War last week, he said they stopped because they didn't want to lose support of the other Arab nations by going beyond the UN resolutions. He didn't mention a thing about compassion and mercy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a lot of perspective on how rest of the world views US. I think the majority here agrees that this war is atleast in part about oil. Is that oil the reason enough to further alienate a sixth (+) of world's population. Remember, the horrific acts of 9/11 were committed by people who were directly or indirectly affected by US's policies (be it israel or oil or iraq-1). We just don’t get it. You cannot pay anyone enough to die for something unless they actually believe in the cause. We can call them cowards all we want but we aren’t doing much better ourselves. We'd likely be responsible for half a million mostly civilian causalities as a result of this war… because of oil... using our military superiority. Yeah half a dozen warplanes lost to malfunctions, a couple dozen soldiers (preferably canadians or brits :)) lost to friendly fire… we don’t have much to loose. Most of it will come down to pressing buttons to destroy and kill and feel brave (opposite of coward BTW) about it. Think about it! So how do we deal with them… not by bombing them... that is exactly the reason they are acting like this in the first place. If US were to go ahead with this war for the reasons on the table, we would probably get cheap oil but this country would become progressively less secure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said that out of spite...It just seems to me
that the U.S has the bow before us,or we will kick
your ass attitude with these little countries.What
happened with North Korea,and Osama.Who exactly
are we pissed at?

p.s. what was the outcome of vietnam,
because all I can really think of is alot
of dead people!!!! >>>>>peace:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

As far as I can tell, there isn't any reliable evidence showing a significant payout or support by Saddam Hussein of the type of terrorism that attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. There isn't any reliable evidence showing governmental support by Iraq of Al-Qaeda.



One example... Saddham openly admitted to paying families of the Palestinians that walked onto a crowded bus blowing themselves up in Israel.

I think Exiling Saddham is even a worse idea.. He needs to be charged for international war crimes. Either he gives himself up to face the consequences of his actions or we kill him..

The people that have actually made it out of Iraq say they HATE Saddham. If you say anything against him in that country the death squads lead by his own sons will hunt you down killing you and your whole family.

Even his body guards are waken up in the middle of the night with hooded men holding guns to their heads saying "are you with us?" Anything other than a life sacrificing NO gets your head blown off. People follow him out of SHEER TERROR facing the consequences. He is a mad man.. What Saddham can and will do if exiled or not killed will make Bin Laden look like a girl scout...

If we do this right this time and Bush follows through on Regime change an interum government will be set in place allowing the Iraqi people to PROSPER. If we do this we are abligated to see that country into prosperity..

Rhino

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If we do this right this time and Bush follows through on Regime change an interum government will be set in place allowing the Iraqi people to PROSPER. If we do this we are abligated to see that country into prosperity..



Like we're doing in Afghanistan?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

One example... Saddham openly admitted to paying families of the Palestinians that walked onto a crowded bus blowing themselves up in Israel.



That makes it Israel's problem.

Other countries have governments that "disappear" people; Argentina (not commonly thought of as a terrorist state) even has the term "desaparecidos" for those who left and never came back.

Just because
we don't like them, they're not like us, and they have something we want, and we have God on our side
is not a justification.

There are justifications; we just don't pass the stink test.

Wendy W.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rob:

i agree with what you said about the Iraqi's living in sheer terror of their own leader. (who in my opinion is a "hitler wanna be") but i maintain that if we attack Iraq without the consent of the U.N and the WHOLE world community, it will be hell to pay. i agree, if we could arrest him, charge him and make him pay for his crimes, there would be way less bloodshed, but this will never happen. by the way, have we forgotten selling arms to the contras during reagen/wyubya' sr's reign? are we any better? why do we have to constantly impose our will upon others? Saddaam isn't bothering anyone right now, so i say let's be patient and let the U.N. inspection team finish their work. by the way all this time were focusing on the middle east, our nabors in cuba could be up to god knows what.
--Richard--
"We Will Not Be Shaken By Thugs, And Terroist"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

If we do this right this time and Bush follows through on Regime change an interum government will be set in place allowing the Iraqi people to PROSPER. If we do this we are abligated to see that country into prosperity..



Like we're doing in Afghanistan?



Nope... Worse. The majority of Iraqi people live in cities and a lot of them live off government support, as opposed to the Afghans who are farmers and are to some extent self-reliant. Bombing cities and destroying Iraq's infrastructure (not to mention their government) will cause widespread famine rather than prosperity (which may or may not follow. In a few decades). If you are really so set on helping them, an operation to overthrow their government from the inside, assassinate Saddam and expose the people to western propaganda/humanitarian aid would be much more efficient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0