mattb 0 #26 November 15, 2002 SIM cards in US cell phones ? ? ? Few and far between Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,076 #27 November 15, 2002 >Uhh...you can already be quite easily tracked via your cell phone. >Even if you aren't talking on it. You can track a phone to a given cell via registration attempts, and you can track AMPS phones individually with a doppler scanner, but right now there's no way to accurately track a CDMA digital phone down to a few meters (the most popular type) or to track large numbers of AMPS phones down to a few meters. This is why the E911 requirement has proven so hard to implement, and why GPS is now being used for that purpose. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freeflir29 0 #28 November 15, 2002 Quotebut right now there's no way to accurately track a CDMA digital phone down to a few meters So CDMA does not transmit a signal? DF? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,076 #29 November 15, 2002 >So CDMA does not transmit a signal? DF? During idle a CDMA phone transmits a signal only during re-registration i.e. leaving or entering a new cell. In addition, all CDMA phones in an area use the same frequency; they are separated only in codespace. There are no DF's currently available that can distinguish several transmitters all on the same frequency separated only by codespace. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freeflir29 0 #30 November 15, 2002 QuoteThere are no DF's currently available that can distinguish several transmitters all on the same frequency separated only by codespace Ahhh...interesting. Doesn't the CDMA network know the difference between each phone though? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,076 #31 November 15, 2002 >Ahhh...interesting. Doesn't the CDMA network know the difference >between each phone though? Yes, through its PN (pseudorandom noise) number. It is a very, very long sequence (repeats every 3 months or something) that the receiver must both know and synchronize to to be able to receive the signal. In normal operation, the phone listens to the pilot and then sync channels of the base station, and through these channels the base station tells the phone to start its PN at a certain point. The phone does, and the cellsite then compares its PN to a list of 'known-good' list of phones, and if the received signal matches one of those, the base station begins demodulating that particular PN code. So problem 1 is that you'd have to 'take over' the phone and pretend to be a cell site, so the phone would provide you a PN you could sync to. Problem 2 is you'd have to know what possible PN's the phone could have (theoretically possible if you hack the provider's computer.) Problem 3 is that you're now receiving the signal, but a regular DF will still do you no good, since there's no one RF signal to lock onto. A mechanically scanned antenna would be your best bet, since you could use the signal strength received as you move the antenna around as a rough guide to which direction it's in. Of course, if you could do all that, you probably already work for Qualcomm. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spy38W 0 #32 November 15, 2002 **fizzle fizzle, pop....** -- Hook high, flare on time Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
n2skdvn 0 #33 November 15, 2002 uh.... what bill said if my calculations are correct SLINKY + ESCULATOR = EVERLASTING FUN my site Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites