Staso 0 #26 October 31, 2002 Quote I was talking about TAME. You're on your own with the skydicing, but I think that one could become very popular with people that like to funnel big-ways i haven't been doing much at my work for a couple of weeks now, so i became to lazy. can't type at all :) skydicing forever ! stan. -- it's not about defying gravity; it's how hard you can abuse it. speed skydiving it is ... Speed Skydiving Forum Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gale 0 #27 October 31, 2002 Personally, I would love it if skydiving were safe. I'm in it for what I get to do, not the danger I wish to mitigate. If the sport lost some of that "I'm cooler then you" vibe it would be fine with me. I don't need the possibility of femuring in to be cool - but that's just me. GaleI'm drowning...so come inside Welcome to my...dirty mind Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Staso 0 #28 October 31, 2002 QuotePersonally, I would love it if skydiving were safe. I'm in it for what I get to do, not the danger I wish to mitigate. If the sport lost some of that "I'm cooler then you" vibe it would be fine with me. I don't need the possibility of femuring in to be cool - but that's just me. Gale so would you trade it for wind tunnel ? unless you like canopy flying .. -- it's not about defying gravity; it's how hard you can abuse it. speed skydiving it is ... Speed Skydiving Forum Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KATO33 0 #29 October 31, 2002 QuoteI don't need to die to have fun. The thrill is in the flight! DITTO!!!! Blue Skies Black Death Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
happythoughts 0 #30 October 31, 2002 Quote ...the possibility of femuring in to be cool - but that's just me. Gale With ya on that. We participate in a sport where "femur" is a verb and everyone knows what you are talking about when you use it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Staso 0 #31 October 31, 2002 there was a very good show on TLC channel yesterday. about high speeds and dangerous kinds of sports in general. and why this kind of sports appeal to people. it's gonna be on TV this saturday from 2 till 4 ET i beleive. i think it's worth watching. explains a lot :) stan. -- it's not about defying gravity; it's how hard you can abuse it. speed skydiving it is ... Speed Skydiving Forum Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #32 October 31, 2002 >if it wasn't for danger part, freefalling and going to wind tunnel >would be the same, wouldn't it ? Still wouldn't be the same. And if you used faulty parts in the wind tunnel, such that a fan burst could kill you (and made it riskier than skydiving) tunnel flying wouldn't get better. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deuce 1 #33 October 31, 2002 Uh, it's not safe?I was under the impression if I maintained my gear and did my part I wouldn't get hurt. Same with my motorcycle, using a ladder, operating a chainsaw, and driving, right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JDBoston 0 #34 October 31, 2002 Of course! That's why I can only talk about it with people I don't already know, especially people with boobs. Joe Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jumperconway 0 #35 October 31, 2002 I can appreciate the speed diving thing. Before skydiving I used to run crotch rockets a fast as I could and people would say I was crazy. I would say "I can always have an open shoebox funeral!" always wear head gear! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edenney 0 #36 October 31, 2002 Can't do a 60 or 100+ way in a tunnel :). Besides, the swoop down to the formation is half the fun. I'm an RW guy and I enjoy the canopy ride (though I don't do hook turns) and I'd much rather jump out of a plane than go to the tunnel, even if it was as safe as the tunnel. My 2 cents worth.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #37 October 31, 2002 Quoteif it wasn't for danger part, freefalling and going to wind tunnel would be the same, wouldn't it ? No it wouldn't. I've done both and the experience is very different. Real freefall is a much more intense experience...and not just because of the danger, but because of the whole view, plus the ability to really fly around, track, use different body positions, work with large groups, etc. etc. Wind tunnels have their place for training, but, believe me, the experience is NOT the same. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gale 0 #38 October 31, 2002 "so would you trade it for wind tunnel ? unless you like canopy flying .. " Well, I don't know. I've ever been to one and I'm not likely to anytime soon as I'm in Western Canada. I suspect however, that I would miss the exits (I really love them) and the space, and the view, and yes, even the canopy ride. (Even though landing scares me) So I don't think I could trade it. It would be interesting to try the tunnel though just to see what I'd really think. GaleI'm drowning...so come inside Welcome to my...dirty mind Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #39 October 31, 2002 >the example with wind tunnel is very good. if it wasn't for danger part, >freefalling and going to wind tunnel would be the same, wouldn't it ? So if you found a dangerous enough wind tunnel, would it really be able to substitute for skydiving for you? It wouldn't for me at all. I'd avoid dangerous wind tunnels like the plauge. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clrarch 0 #40 October 31, 2002 I started skydiving in June----thought I would do that one tandem jump and the next thing you know I'm enrolled in AFF. Hooked? Oh yeah My family and friends have felt it is their duty to remind me on an almost daily basis since June that I have some kind of a death wish because I'm doing something that is so DANGEROUS But I look at it like this: Skydiving isn't more dangerous than skiing (something I've done since I was 4 years old), or driving in Boston (ever driven a car in Boston? Bunch of crackheads behind the wheel out here). Sorry if any of you are the crackheads I'm referring to It feels like a greater risk because it's not "normal". So, for me, I don't see it as being any safer or more dangerous than some of the other things I do...it's just a different thrill. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Staso 0 #41 October 31, 2002 Quote or driving in Boston (ever driven a car in Boston? Bunch of crackheads behind the wheel out here). he-he :) i do live in boston stan. -- it's not about defying gravity; it's how hard you can abuse it. speed skydiving it is ... Speed Skydiving Forum Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clrarch 0 #42 October 31, 2002 So you're one of the crackheads! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dove 0 #43 November 1, 2002 Your to pickey abuot you're speling lummy. Fall in dove. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #44 November 1, 2002 >Skydiving isn't more dangerous than skiing (something I've done > since I was 4 years old), or driving in Boston (ever driven a car in > Boston? Bunch of crackheads behind the wheel out here). Sorry if > any of you are the crackheads I'm referring to It feels like a > greater risk because it's not "normal". So, for me, I don't see it as > being any safer or more dangerous than some of the other things I > do...it's just a different thrill. It's definitely more dangerous than driving, even in Boston (I lived in Cambridge for four years.) It depends on how you add it up, but it's hard to play with the stats or definitions to make it as safe as driving. My own analogies (and these, of course, are something of a WAG) are that it's more dangerous than driving, safer than flying your own plane. Although since you don't have the benefit of metal landing gear, you're still more likely to get injured than a GA pilot. As a very simple test of this, add up the number of people you know who have been seriously injured or killed skydiving, then the number who have been seriously injured or killed driving to and from the DZ. For me it's about ten to one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weegegirl 2 #45 November 1, 2002 I'd still do it.... but it wouldn't have all the adrenaline that I can't live without. The danger of it all really gets my blood flowing. It pushes me to work harder and focus more. In fact, that's why it is such a huge stress relief. While skydiving, it is unsafe to think about anything but what you are doing in the air.... oh, and who you'll be doing on the ground. woh! did I say that out loud? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lummy 4 #46 November 1, 2002 Quote Your to pickey abuot you're speling lummy hey, I was only playing with the fact that we're talking about dangerous sports and one of the typo's says TAME... Now the Skydicing is another whole ball of whacks...I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wilmshurst 0 #47 November 1, 2002 Re windtunnels versus skydiving. As has already been said, skydiving has the big advantages of visuals and freedom (ie, not flying in an oversized metal can). Re risktakers, I saw a TV show that stated that males who take risks (engage in risky activities) are more attractive to the opposite sex as such behaviour communicates an ability to provide (think 'dawn of time' when the male was responsible for the hunting and gathering to provide for the family). "Sometimes you kick; sometimes you get kicked" - INXS The only thing worse than a cold toilet seat is a warm toilet seat. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flypunk 0 #48 November 1, 2002 the thrill does not come from the danger it comes from the freedom, id it could be made completely safe by some magic fairy dust or something then bring it on, more freedom. ... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goose491 0 #49 November 1, 2002 Quotethe thrill does not come from the danger it comes from the freedom, id it could be made completely safe by some magic fairy dust or something then bring it on, more freedom. The adrenaline rush may come from the freedom and feeling of human flight but there is no denying that the dopamine (this is responsible for the perma-grin afterwards) comes directly from the fear of death (conscious or sub). My Karma ran over my Dogma!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clrarch 0 #50 November 1, 2002 It's definitely more dangerous than driving, even in Boston (I lived in Cambridge for four years.) It depends on how you add it up, but it's hard to play with the stats or definitions to make it as safe as driving. My own analogies (and these, of course, are something of a WAG) are that it's more dangerous than driving, safer than flying your own plane. Although since you don't have the benefit of metal landing gear, you're still more likely to get injured than a GA pilot. As a very simple test of this, add up the number of people you know who have been seriously injured or killed skydiving, then the number who have been seriously injured or killed driving to and from the DZ. For me it's about ten to one. I'm new to the sport of skydiving, so at this point in time I'm very lucky to be able to say the number of people I know who have been seriously injured or killed skydiving is zero. I'm not delusional, though, so I know the longer I stay with this sport, that fact will sadly change. I have lost a number of friends to driving accidents, though, from the time I was a teenager to the present. I joke about the drivers in Boston. I'm well aware of the dangers and risks involved with skydiving, and I take the training very seriously. In the spirit of the original post/thread, if I could make this 100% safe, I would---and I would still love to jump. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites