0
gemini

It is Time for This Nonsense to Stop!

Recommended Posts

washingtonpost.com
Pledge Declared Unconstitutional


By David Kravets
Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, June 26, 2002; 2:22 PM

SAN FRANCISCO –– A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that the Pledge of Allegiance is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion and cannot be recited in schools.


© 2002 The Associated Press

Blue skies,

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah.....and I understand that at some school (in LA, I believe....probably more than one) kids can't play tag on the playground either! Private school is becoming a better and better option.....
--
A conservative is just a liberal who's been mugged. A liberal is just a conservative who's been to jail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Full story here . . .

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49515-2002Jun26.html

The problem appears to be the the phrase "under God" which, and I know I'll get flack for this, I agree with. That is to say, the phrase has no business being in there.

Congress did a lot of wacky stuff in the mid-50s trying to prove that we were somehow different than the commies. This was one of them.

The country had gone a lot of years without this phrase and survived just fine.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

How long before some damn bastard complains about "In God We Trust" on the currency?



And that's ANOTHER wacky thing Congress added in the mid-50s to "prove" we were different than the Commies. Again, we survived just fine for many, many years without that as well.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

And it seems that these days "The public" wants to be more like them by outlawing all references to religion in daily life. >:( Idiots



No. I don't think so. Just do what is called for in the U.S. Constitution and separate Church and State.

Pretty simple really.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That quote you put up is a little off. They didn't say the pledge of allegiance couldn't be recited in schools. A little further down in the article they state what the court actually ruled:

"The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a 1954 act of Congress inserting the phrase "under God" after the words "one nation" in the pledge. "

They effectively modified the pledge so that it can be used in schools without violating the requirement for separation of church and state. I think that's a valid and proper ruling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why is the mention of God so offensive to so many people, but we tolerate the trash the media spills out daily via television, internet, magazines, newspapers, etc.?

I find it amazing that those who have a problem with "In God we Trust" are usually the same people who completely trusted former President Clinton.



_________________________________________
Chris






Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Are there not more important things our high courts should be considering? What is the big deal?



There's nothing more important in life than the small things. Because we can settle small things like this fairly in court Americans don't have to resort to civil unrest where crowds of citizens storm police hiding behind body shields firing tear gas.

Personally, if the founding fathers of our country didn't need "under God" or "in God we trust" then we don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>And it seems that these days "The public" wants to be more like them by outlawing all references to religion in daily life. Idiots <

last i heard in America you had freedom of religion. This also entails freedom of no religion. I know quite a few people that do not believe in any god. One of the most true things I have ever heard went like this
“people are always so willing to share their religious beliefs with you but are less willing to hear yours especially if it differs from theirs”
Now I am not trying to start a huge argument about religion but many people forget that some people do not believe in any form of religion. That is why religion is being taken out of the schools and government.
Also to all the flamers out there
1) I am not trying to start a debate over religion.
2) everyone is entitled to their own religious beliefs that is one of the reasons that peopled moved to America.
3) this is just my opinion. I am not trying to start any arguments or debates.
I am sorry if i have offended anyone out thier. that was not my intentions.
if fun were easy it wouldn't be worth having, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Can you Quote the section of the Constitution where is says anything about the seperation of church and state? Try.......



Ok...hmmm, let's see...a little thing called the Bill of Rights

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I hated Clinton from the start. But the MTV generation voted him in.

I believe in the Constitution. We can't pray openly at public schools. I don't see that as a problem. I went to Catholic schools all my life except for a few years. We should honor separation of church and state. I don't have a problem with "In God we trust". Just that it's on our money is not separating Church and State. What if some citizens don't believe in "God". It is not fair to them to have to read it on their money.

Why is it a problem to take "In God We Trust" off our money?

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Ok...hmmm, let's see...a little thing called the Bill of Rights

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.



The above quote doesn't say anything about the separation of church and state. All it says is that you can't pass laws favoring one religion over another.


Try again.... :)

"Your mother's full of stupidjuice!"
My Art Project

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I find it amazing that those who have a problem with "In God we Trust" are usually the same people who completely trusted former President Clinton.



I find it amazing that people who are supposedly gods most devout servants molest children. Actually, I don't find it amazing. After all, in my opinion, religion is a human created method of influencing others to adhere to someone's set of moral values.

To me, making children state that they live in a nation "under god" is akin to stating that they live in a nation "ruled by the Easter bunny". I understand that this may offend some of you, but I'm not going to make you say it. So why should I or anyone else be forced to say, or rather, PLEDGE something that may offend them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0