lawrocket 3 #1 April 19, 2004 So, it appears that he had no WMD. It appears that a growing number of people now believe the war was unjust. Should Saddam Hussein be released? If so, why? If not, why not? My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #2 April 19, 2004 I voted yes. But first they should make sure that the family members of everyone he tortured, gassed, and killed are lined up outside the door to the prison. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #3 April 19, 2004 I don't know why, but I'm laughing at this...I can't wait to see someone "state the case" for release... So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #4 April 19, 2004 QuoteI don't know why, but I'm laughing at this...I can't wait to see someone "state the case" for release... I say put a Saddam look alike in power and make him a puppet of the U.S. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,070 #5 April 19, 2004 >Should Saddam Hussein be released? Only to the new government of Iraq so he can be put on trial there. He tortured and killed Iraqis; they should decide his fate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kai2k1 0 #6 April 19, 2004 Lets just try him for 2 million murders of his own people. There's no truer sense of flying than sky diving," Scott Cowan Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #7 April 19, 2004 Come on. The war was unfair, wrong, bad intelligence, unjustified, never should have happened, yadda yadda. Dozens of posters here believe that. If that's the case, then he should certanly not be imprisoned, right? My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #8 April 19, 2004 QuoteCome on. The war was unfair, wrong, bad intelligence, unjustified, never should have happened, yadda yadda. Dozens of posters here believe that. I believe that. QuoteIf that's the case, then he should certanly not be imprisoned, right? No, he should be. He commited crimes against his own people, and they should hold him accountable. Still doesn't mean we should have gone in there to make the arrest. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #9 April 19, 2004 I vote no, but if they were to release him into skydivexxl's custody in a third world nation where Andy couldn't be prosecuted, I might be enticed to change my vote....Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #10 April 19, 2004 QuoteNo, he should be. He commited crimes against his own people, and they should hold him accountable. Still doesn't mean we should have gone in there to make the arrest. If you kill someone in your own home (non-self defense related), police can go in there to make the arrest.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #11 April 19, 2004 QuoteIf you kill someone in your own home (non-self defense related), police can go in there to make the arrest. So we are the police of the world? Does the rest of the world know and agree with that? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #12 April 19, 2004 QuoteIf you kill someone in your own home (non-self defense related), police can go in there to make the arrest. Police has jurisdiction, US did not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimbo 0 #13 April 19, 2004 QuoteI voted yes. But first they should make sure that the family members of everyone he tortured, gassed, and killed are lined up outside the door to the prison. I'll second that motion. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #14 April 19, 2004 QuoteQuoteIf you kill someone in your own home (non-self defense related), police can go in there to make the arrest. So we are the police of the world? Does the rest of the world know and agree with that? Only when it's convenient to them. Our policy prior to WWII was to stay out of everyone's beezwax. Well, events of the world won't let us. Now the world has to deal with it.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #15 April 19, 2004 QuoteQuoteIf you kill someone in your own home (non-self defense related), police can go in there to make the arrest. Police has jurisdiction, US did not. We pay the police for their work. I don't see the world paying us. What's the national content of most UN forces? (real question, I have no idea) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #16 April 19, 2004 QuoteWe pay the police for their work. I don't see the world paying us. What's the national content of most UN forces? (real question, I have no idea) I may be wrong here (if so someone will surely correct me) but I believe that US troops make up very little of any "UN blue helmet" force, if any at all. I think this is due to the US not allowing its armed forces being under command of any foreign generals (and by influence, country).So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #17 April 19, 2004 I'll let Dave Chappelle do the speaking as black President Bush, "To the U.N., I say, if you got a problem with me, you should take your UN Army and attack the US. Oh, but you don't HAVE an Army, which means, you betta just shut the fuck up! Take it! That's right! We'll take YOU out, Khofi, and you'll be using those 16 languages on the streets of New York sellin' BASEBALL CAPS!" My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndyMan 7 #18 April 19, 2004 No. While I firmly believe the war IS unjust, and that no WMD will ever be found, Sadam clearly is a criminal of the highest order, and I do hope a respected, fair, and just court finds him guilty of the most heinous crimes he's accused of. _Am__ You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casurf1978 0 #19 April 19, 2004 I agree with you. Intresting point is that the same lawyer that defended The Jackel and several of his group will also defend SH. This guy is a real scumbag, he would pass information on from Carlos to his group etc. If you ever come across the book called "The Jackel" get it. Intresting look into the OBL of the 60s, 70s and 80s. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #20 April 19, 2004 I'm not really sure he belongs in U.S. custody after we turn control back over to the Iraqis. Maybe an international court or perhaps the Iraqis themselves, but not really the U.S..quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikkey 0 #21 April 20, 2004 QuoteI may be wrong here (if so someone will surely correct me) but I believe that US troops make up very little of any "UN blue helmet" force, if any at all. I think this is due to the US not allowing its armed forces being under command of any foreign generals (and by influence, country). I think you are wrong here. At least in Nato, US forces have been under non-US command (AFAIK). Example you had a lot of non-US regional commanders in Europe and in these regions you had US troops. I also think that during the Balkan interventions (Bosnia and Kosovo) US forces at times were reporting to non-US commanders.--------------------------------------------------------- When people look like ants - pull. When ants look like people - pray. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimbo 0 #22 April 20, 2004 QuoteI'm not really sure he belongs in U.S. custody after we turn control back over to the Iraqis. Maybe an international court or perhaps the Iraqis themselves, but not really the U.S.. Why an international court, but not the US, and only perhaps the Iraqis? - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikkey 0 #23 April 20, 2004 QuoteQuoteI'm not really sure he belongs in U.S. custody after we turn control back over to the Iraqis. Maybe an international court or perhaps the Iraqis themselves, but not really the U.S.. Why an international court, but not the US, and only perhaps the Iraqis? - Jim A case could be made to say that Saddam should be tried by the Iraqis for crimes committed against Iraqis but that he should be tried at the international court for breach of international law and war crimes during the Iran and Kuwait wars.--------------------------------------------------------- When people look like ants - pull. When ants look like people - pray. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #24 April 20, 2004 QuoteQuoteI may be wrong here (if so someone will surely correct me) but I believe that US troops make up very little of any "UN blue helmet" force, if any at all. I think this is due to the US not allowing its armed forces being under command of any foreign generals (and by influence, country). I think you are wrong here. At least in Nato, US forces have been under non-US command (AFAIK). Example you had a lot of non-US regional commanders in Europe and in these regions you had US troops. I also think that during the Balkan interventions (Bosnia and Kosovo) US forces at times were reporting to non-US commanders. Good point. NATO being a military alliance, and IIRC, Gen. Wesley Clark was the NATO supreme commander during ours, and subsequently NATOs intervention in the Balkans.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nbblood 0 #25 April 20, 2004 Quote>Should Saddam Hussein be released? Only to the new government of Iraq so he can be put on trial there. He tortured and killed Iraqis; they should decide his fate. Hey, Billvon, we agree on a political issue!! How about that??!! Blues, NathanBlues, Nathan If you wait 'til the last minute, it'll only take a minute. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites