Recommended Posts
QuotePhillyKev, prepare to be shocked, but, regarding the topic discussed in this thread, I agree completely with what you have written. I agree with EVERY SINGLE WORD.
![]()
Seriously, you have done an excellent job conveying your thoughts and beliefs. Cheers!
Aww crap. Did you have to say that? Now we gotta live with him for the next week or two.



winsor 236
QuoteMike I have a feeling you are going to continue to meet a wall of resistance to your post. Obviously the original post in the women's forum didn't bother anyone but you. Also I am sure the way you went about trying to prove your point offended some of the african american skydivers out there. I would love to hear some of them chime in and let you know how it made them feel reading this post.
Most of the African and African-American skydivers I know are Caucasians. Are you, by any chance, trying to refer to Negroes by that description?
Mincing words accomplishes nothing. If the terminology was good enough for Martin Luther King, Jr., it's good enough for me.
Blue skies,
Winsor
winsor 236
(edited for spelling)
"Agenda" is the plural of "agendum." That should be "no agenda ARE supported..." or "no agendum IS supported...."
Similarly you have:
criteria/criterion
data/datum
addenda/addendum
and so forth.
What's Mensa?
Blue skies,
Winsor

winsor 236
QuoteQuote
I have been a Mensa member since I was 25. There is no discrimination on the basis of sex, race, creed, national origin. People within the group have religious or political affliliations, but no agenda is supported by the organization.
(edited for spelling)Quote
anybody else find that funny?
I find it funny that 2% are members, about 25% claim to be members and 75% have a total lack of interest in being associated.
(Perhaps they are the smart one's.)
The only legitimate reason for Mensa membership is to get laid.
Brilliant women are much better in bed. Trust me.
Blue skies,
Winsor
winsor 236
QuoteActually, this club would still be about how you were born. Only a couple body types can ever achieve that sort of distortion of waist to chest.
=====================================
I understand that genetics would play a minor part. But I really don't think that a .75 ratio is that difficult to achieve.
Out of shape (like now) I have a 30" waist and 42" chest; in shape it's 30" and 44".
Do I qualify?
Steel 0
QuoteQuoteActually, this club would still be about how you were born. Only a couple body types can ever achieve that sort of distortion of waist to chest.
=====================================
I understand that genetics would play a minor part. But I really don't think that a .75 ratio is that difficult to achieve.
Out of shape (like now) I have a 30" waist and 42" chest; in shape it's 30" and 44".
Do I qualify?
yes 30/42 = .71 but you also have to be in the strongest 2%. I am not sure yet how this should be judged probably with the power lifting standard max bench + max squat + max deadlift. A powerlifter freind once told me that to be competitive you had to be able to get atleast 1400, which sucks cause I can't get that high but I am sure that 98% of the general population (not people who work out) will not break 1,000.
Can't think of anything I need
No cigarettes, no sleep, no light, no sound.
Nothing to eat, no books to read.
billvon 3,031
I found that just being a skydiver worked remarkably well. I was often warned by my friends to not expound on the inadequacices of the Long Island power grid while we were out cruising for women; they were of the opinion that women don't like that sort of thing. I suppose it depends on the woman.
winsor 236
QuoteQuoteQuoteActually, this club would still be about how you were born. Only a couple body types can ever achieve that sort of distortion of waist to chest.
=====================================
I understand that genetics would play a minor part. But I really don't think that a .75 ratio is that difficult to achieve.
Out of shape (like now) I have a 30" waist and 42" chest; in shape it's 30" and 44".
Do I qualify?
yes 30/42 = .71 but you also have to be in the strongest 2%.
Okay, if I don't take a shower for a couple of days I'm sure to be in the strongest 2%.
Just because I recognize reality, doesn't mean I adhere to it. Thanks for the insult, though.
edit
And furthermore, if you want an example of someone pushing the collective mindset and encouraging adherence to societal standards, look for people who try to elliminate any method of classifying people and turning everyone into a completely equal, non-unique cog.
Most people have their own ideas about life and society. There aren't 2 sides, The Man vs. Mike. If people have a different opinion than your's, it doesn't make them an ipso facto tool of society. Not trying to come down on you, but your posts seem to be very judgmental of anyone who shares an opinion with anyone else.
PhillyKev, prepare to be shocked, but, regarding the topic discussed in this thread, I agree completely with what you have written. I agree with EVERY SINGLE WORD.
Seriously, you have done an excellent job conveying your thoughts and beliefs. Cheers!
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites