0
quade

Tom Ridge says Al Qaeda preparing "large-scale attack"

Recommended Posts

Quote

Yes, but we were talking about racial profiling. That indicates profiling based on race, not cranial accessories.



Actually we were talking about Profiling....You brought race into it.

Quote

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=1151273#1151273 And young black kids get inconvienced at 3 AM if they are driving a 50,000.00 car.

Young white kids with tatoos and piercings get harrassed everyday.

Thats the problem with profiling....However it does work.



You see I mentioned both white and black kids....But you didn't bother to pay attention to that.

Quote

So you're against giving to people, or helping people, based on race, but have no problem with inconveniencing (at best) or harassing and possibly violating civil rights of people (at worst) based on race?



Well I don't want to take away OR give someone something they didn't earn based on race. To me that is racism.

However I don't have a problem with a cop using someones apperance (Notice not RACE..color of skin is just one small part of apperance) to look into a situation more as long as its legal.

I would not support a guy getting arrested just cause he was black/white/hispanic..ect, But I don't have a problem with them being questioned.

Like I said Profiling works.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm going to take a stab in the dark here and assume PhillyKev never served in the military from the intelligence and logic of his statements.



Bingo. He says his family served, but his asthma kept him from serving.

But it is clear that he has no military or law enforcement training.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Amen. I never understood why people gasp when they hear the words, "racial profiling." Racial profiling is a good thing. Progress moves forward more smoothly when you throw out the PC aspect of it and use good old common sense.



Our not too distant past has proved that too many of our cops and government employees will use profiling to ends not justified.

Currently far too much attention is paid towards people wearing turbans when we still have no shortage of crazy white reactionary types, including the more likely source of the anthrax scare. And given the number of Arab loving, America hating white peaceniks in my parts, which profile seems more dangerous?

Ron writes - 'it's not like the cops were arresting blacks, just detaining them.'
I think you need to review the 50s-70s, and just as likely your current events.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I'm going to take a stab in the dark here and assume PhillyKev never served in the military from the intelligence and logic of his statements.



Bingo. He says his family served, but his asthma kept him from serving.

But it is clear that he has no military or law enforcement training.



So how do you account for me who did serve but I agree with phillyKev? Maybe it is that couple of years of college that turned me in to a liberal. Oh wait this son of Nixon voting Republicans was a liberal before going in to the military or college.


"Truth is tough. It will not break, like a bubble, at a touch; nay, you may kick it about all day like a football, and it will be round and full at evening."
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Ron writes - 'it's not like the cops were arresting blacks, just detaining them.'
I think you need to review the 50s-70s, and just as likely your current events.



Actually I wrote:

Quote

However I don't have a problem with a cop using someones apperance (Notice not RACE..color of skin is just one small part of apperance) to look into a situation more as long as its legal.

I would not support a guy getting arrested just cause he was black/white/hispanic..ect, But I don't have a problem with them being questioned.



If you are gonna quote me do it correctly.

And I don't care what happened 10-15 or even 5 years ago...I am more concerned with today, and tomorrow...I can't change the past...Can you?

And to say it again...I don't have a problem with law enforcment questioning someone based on apperance....Notice I said APPERANCE, not race.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

In Reply To
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Reply To
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I'm going to take a stab in the dark here and assume PhillyKev never served in the military from the intelligence and logic of his statements.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Bingo. He says his family served, but his asthma kept him from serving.

But it is clear that he has no military or law enforcement training.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


So how do you account for me who did serve but I agree with phillyKev? Maybe it is that couple of years of college that turned me in to a liberal. Oh wait this son of Nixon voting Republicans was a liberal before going in to the military or college.



How does your reply have jack to do with the above conversation?

Tuna asked a question, and I answered it.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


How does your reply have jack to do with the above conversation?

Tuna asked a question, and I answered it.



Because you were lording your "military experience" over him, as if you were somehow superior for that fact.

I'd say the opposite is actually true, because he has not been through a deliberate process of indoctrination. Unlike you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Because you were lording your "military experience" over him, as if you were somehow superior for that fact.

I'd say the opposite is actually true, because he has not been through a deliberate process of indoctrination. Unlike you.



Does it hurt to have such a tiny ability to think?

Question asked...Question answered.

Quote

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=1152586#1152586

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Reply To
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I'm going to take a stab in the dark here and assume PhillyKev never served in the military from the intelligence and logic of his statements.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Bingo. He says his family served, but his asthma kept him from serving.

But it is clear that he has no military or law enforcement training.



Well gee....I don't see any "lording" of anything.
Nor do I see any comment of me being "superior" due to anything.

I see a question, and an answer....You must be tired from jumping to all those conclusions.

BTW yes I am proud of my service...It means I put my wants and desires second to those of the Nation...something I think more should do.

Have you?
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And the reason that today is different from yesterday is because of enough people bitching about the way things were handled yesterday.

If a person with tattoos is wandering an expensive neighborhood you indicate that it is OK for the cops to stop and talk to them for no other reason than they look out of place. Wwe all know this happens. If a person in a suit is roaming the slums do you stop that person too? They are certainly out of place. Or a white person in the black part of town or an apparently staight couple in a gay neighborhood.

I am not saying that profiling doesn't work only that because "I don't look like I belong here" is not probable cause.


"Truth is tough. It will not break, like a bubble, at a touch; nay, you may kick it about all day like a football, and it will be round and full at evening."
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Tuna Said:

Quote


I'm going to take a stab in the dark here and assume PhillyKev never served in the military from the intelligence and logic of his statements.


Ron said:
Quote


Bingo. He says his family served, but his asthma kept him from serving.

But it is clear that he has no military or law enforcement training.


NewsStand said:
Quote


So how do you account for me who did serve but I agree with phillyKev? Maybe it is that couple of years of college that turned me in to a liberal. Oh wait this son of Nixon voting Republicans was a liberal before going in to the military or college.



How does your reply have jack to do with the above conversation?

Tuna asked a question, and I answered it.



The question and answer imply that had he served in the military he would take a more conservative point of view and would agree that profiling is a good idea.

Now had he served recently that might be true but when I went in in '76 most people of my age and up to five or six years older were of a much more liberal (open minded) bent. When I got out of the reserves after the first Gulf war that same age group were much more conservative. I can only attribute it to growing up during and/or serving in Viet Nam and neighboring countries. Those that had experienced the ugly truth of a bad idea where more open to change.

BTW, I also think that many veterans in this forum seem to think they are better than others simply because they are veterens. Some of them may be better than the rest of us but it is not simply because they served.


"Truth is tough. It will not break, like a bubble, at a touch; nay, you may kick it about all day like a football, and it will be round and full at evening."
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If a person with tattoos is wandering an expensive neighborhood you indicate that it is OK for the cops to stop and talk to them for no other reason than they look out of place. Wwe all know this happens. If a person in a suit is roaming the slums do you stop that person too?



Yes.

Quote

They are certainly out of place. Or a white person in the black part of town or an apparently staight couple in a gay neighborhood.



Yep. But I would be more interested in finding out why the guy in a suit was in the slums than a straight couple in "gay" neighborhood. The straight couple I doubt is doing anything fishy.

Quote

I am not saying that profiling doesn't work only that because "I don't look like I belong here" is not probable cause.



But if it works, and it does not go to far...whats the problem? I would not mind being stopped by the cops if I were in Englewood or Compton. As long as they don't violate my rights....And asking em a few questions is NOT violating my rights.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The question and answer imply that had he served in the military he would take a more conservative point of view and would agree that profiling is a good idea.



Close...the answer was to Tuna's question about if he had served.

Now I do believe that if he had military or police training he would have a better grasp of the real world benefits of profiling...(Notice I didn't say shit about race...I said Profiling which could include race, but not totally).

Quote

BTW, I also think that many veterans in this forum seem to think they are better than others simply because they are veterens



I would not say better...I would say that those that did serve (including you) are better to make comments about the service, and issues relating to the service than those that never did, or that never served but watched "Rambo" a bunch.

Just like the fact that you served during a conflict makes you better prepared to comment on actually being in a fire fight than me, who never had to actually pull the trigger.

But many times here people don't seem to respect the experiences of those that have actually DONE what they are commenting about..Be it jumps, or combat choices.

I find that funny.

As for do I think I am a better person because I have served? Good question. I am a better person than if I had never served. I do think that most should serve. And I think that most would benefit from an enlistment.

I do think that those that have served do know more about serving/warfare/duty ect than those that never did serve.

But they would rather say I was just "indoctrinated"...Well if my indoctrination taught me duty and honor...Well more should do it.

Edit to add: There is something about having the experience of laying it the puddle in the middle of a freezing rain with a weapon...And doing it not cause you want to (who the hell would WANT to?) but be willing to do it because it is your duty. And knowing that what you are doing no matter how shitty it is is NOTHING compared to what some before you did for the country, and its nothing compared to what those that follow you will do for the country. Yes, you bitch about the rain and the cold, and yes it sucks..But you do the shitty job because you volunteered to put your wants and needs secondary to the countries needs. Thats honor, thats Duty...And some that have used the rights that in your small part gave them who never had to do anything but what they wanted to do...could never understand.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow this is probably the most rational discussion we two have ever had.

I want to clarify one thing first. I served a couple of years after Viet Nam and during the Gulf War but did not particiapte in either. I have never been in military combat and can't begin to comment on what it would be like other than to assume it would suck.

For the most part I agree with what you say here. Serving did make me a better person than I was before but not neccessarily better than people who have not served.

There is a difference between indoctrination and learning. If you came away from the military with an attitude of "My country, right or wrong." or worse "My country is always right." then you were indoctrinated. On the other hand if you came away with "There are a lot of hard things to do in life and sometimes you just have to get through them." then you learned.

Edited to move comments about prrofiling to a different post.


"Truth is tough. It will not break, like a bubble, at a touch; nay, you may kick it about all day like a football, and it will be round and full at evening."
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

They are certainly out of place. Or a white person in the black part of town or an apparently staight couple in a gay neighborhood.



Yep. But I would be more interested in finding out why the guy in a suit was in the slums than a straight couple in "gay" neighborhood. The straight couple I doubt is doing anything fishy.

...

But if it works, and it does not go to far...whats the problem? I would not mind being stopped by the cops if I were in Englewood or Compton. As long as they don't violate my rights....And asking em a few questions is NOT violating my rights.



Well at least you are consistent in how you would apply it. The couple could be Christian fundamentalists scouting the neightborhood for deviant behaviour that should be punished by God and they will be his hand. :)
Profiling does have real world benefits but at the same time can quickly deteriorate in to harrassment and that is why it is a bad thing. In rural Texas "driving while black" is a real thing and is used many times just for the amusement of the officer involved.


"Truth is tough. It will not break, like a bubble, at a touch; nay, you may kick it about all day like a football, and it will be round and full at evening."
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I want to clarify one thing first. I served a couple of years after Viet Nam and during the Gulf War but did not particiapte in either. I have never been in military combat and can't begin to comment on what it would be like other than to assume it would suck.



Ok but do you think you are better qualified to make that assumption than a guy that had never served?

I think you are due to you having experiences closer to the event. A guy that has trained to fight, but never did is better qualified than a guy whos only uniform worn was a Boy Scout uniform and the one at MacDonalds.

Quote

For the most part I agree with what you say here. Serving did make me a better person than I was before but not neccessarily better than people who have not served.



But much more qualified to make choices based on training that you would have recieved in the military or in the police force right?

Quote

There is a difference between indoctrination and learning. If you came away from the military with an attitude of "My country, right or wrong." or worse "My country is always right." then you were indoctrinated. On the other hand if you came away with "There are a lot of hard things to do in life and sometimes you just have to get through them." then you learned.



I think its a little of both. Maybe something along the lines of "There are some really shitty things you have to do in life, some you will not like, some you will downright hate. Some you will understand and some you will not. But when it comes down to kill or die...I'll kill and let the enemy die. But I will do my duty." Now that applied to when I was in...I agreed to do what my government asked me to do as long as it was legal. I swore to it and signed my name on the line..... Now I am out and I don't have to do those things.

I think almost everyone would benefit from service...What do you think?
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well at least you are consistent in how you would apply it. The couple could be Christian fundamentalists scouting the neightborhood for deviant behaviour that should be punished by God and they will be his hand.



OK well in that case then stopping them and asking a few questions could save a life right? Either way I am for profiling. As long as it is not taken out of hand...Or is done illegally.

Quote

Profiling does have real world benefits but at the same time can quickly deteriorate in to harrassment and that is why it is a bad thing. In rural Texas "driving while black" is a real thing and is used many times just for the amusement of the officer involved.



The in that case it was taken out of hand. If a black kid is stopped and asked a few questions about why he is driving a 50,000 car in a rich neighborhood and he is not a recording artist who lives there...Hell, pull him over and ask for his ID. If he checks out let him go.

If a white preppy kid is cruzing the slums in the middle of the night...Hell, pull him over also. He might be looking for a drug deal.

Hell for that matter if a preppy kid is cruzing around in the rich neighborhood at 3 AM..Hell, pull him over as well and ask a few questions...He might be drunk.

In the case of a black man being harrassed just cause...Well thats a case of a cop getting out of hand...And that should be delt with on a case by case basis...Fire the guys that abuse their power...It would not be hard to track who pulled over who and why. Understand that if I pull over more black kids than white, but I work in a black neighborhood...well that is noramal.

For the record I have been stopped and question several times in my life...Once a good old boy was messing with me since I had a personalized license plate. That was THE reason he pulled me over...Well I answered his questions, called him officer or sir and he checked me out...I was clean and he let me move on my merry way...That was 15-20 min out of my life. Big deal. If I got pulled over once a week due to that license plate...I'd change the damn plate, not bitch about it.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Ron writes - 'it's not like the cops were arresting blacks, just detaining them.'
I think you need to review the 50s-70s, and just as likely your current events.



Actually I wrote:

Quote

However I don't have a problem with a cop using someones apperance (Notice not RACE..color of skin is just one small part of apperance) to look into a situation more as long as its legal.

I would not support a guy getting arrested just cause he was black/white/hispanic..ect, But I don't have a problem with them being questioned.



If you are gonna quote me do it correctly.



questioned = detained.

Quote


And I don't care what happened 10-15 or even 5 years ago...I am more concerned with today, and tomorrow...I can't change the past...Can you?

And to say it again...I don't have a problem with law enforcment questioning someone based on apperance....Notice I said APPERANCE, not race.



Assuming 5 or 10-15 years ago is the past is the problem here, Ron. That's not long enough ago - you have the same cops and ATF agents out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would say probably better qualified than someone who had not served but you can also get in to civilian contractors and the rest. Not serving does not make an opinion about the military automatically invalid.

The whole "kill or die" thing is not what I was talking about. That is only logical to most people unless you are a really hard core pacifist. My point was people from all walks of life end up with the idea that the authority is right because it is authority. And this is certainly something that the military tries to drum in to recruits. If you left the military with that thought process in place then you were indoctrinated. If you question authority occasionally then you were not.

I too lived up to my military promises and try to do as well in civilian life. That is why I showed up at reserve duty during the Gulf war and would have gone if called even though I disagreed with what we were doing. That is also why I got out when it was over so that I would not have to participate in anything I didn't agree with later.

I think a lot of people would benefit from some sort of government service. Doesn't have to be the military. But doing something because it is good for other people and helps other people will always help you.


"Truth is tough. It will not break, like a bubble, at a touch; nay, you may kick it about all day like a football, and it will be round and full at evening."
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If a person with tattoos is wandering an expensive neighborhood you indicate that it is OK for the cops to stop and talk to them for no other reason than they look out of place.



Um, I know plenty of rich brats who go out and get tattoos. Now, if we're talking about a full on scary punk rocker look at 3am, yeah, a cop might want to ask if everything's ok.

Quote

We all know this happens. If a person in a suit is roaming the slums do you stop that person too? They are certainly out of place.



Hell yes. (A) People in suits commit crimes too and (B) he's a likely target for a crime - that thing cops are supposed to prevent.

In parts of PG County, MD if you see a white guy and a black guy in a car together, it's a drug deal happening. A cop needs a better reason to intervene, but that doesn't change that that's what's going on.

Quote

Or a white person in the black part of town or an apparently straight couple in a gay neighborhood.



I wouldn't say a white person in any part of town is out of place just because of the color of his skin. Like someone said, skin color is just one part of appearance. Oh, and since when are gay neighborhoods all that territorial? Would a "seemingly" straight couple look out of place there?

Quote

I am not saying that profiling doesn't work only that because "I don't look like I belong here" is not probable cause.



You don't need Probable Cause for a Terry stop, and you sure don't need it to stop and ask questions.


In my book, the more people cops talk to on the street, the better things are in the neighborhood. Then again, I don't think every badge-wearer is the enemy of things decent and wholesome.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If I got pulled over once a week due to that license plate...I'd change the damn plate, not bitch about it.



And this is where we differ. Why should I have to change things that are not harming someone else?

When someone ran a key through my GWB is a punk-ass chump bumper sticker I didn't take it off I add "Regime change begins at home."

Freedom of speech works both ways.


"Truth is tough. It will not break, like a bubble, at a touch; nay, you may kick it about all day like a football, and it will be round and full at evening."
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

...

Quote

We all know this happens. If a person in a suit is roaming the slums do you stop that person too? They are certainly out of place.



Hell yes. (A) People in suits commit crimes too and (B) he's a likely target for a crime - that thing cops are supposed to prevent.



Good for you too. Like Ron you are at least consistent in your application.

Quote


In parts of PG County, MD if you see a white guy and a black guy in a car together, it's a drug deal happening. A cop needs a better reason to intervene, but that doesn't change that that's what's going on.


May be going on which is why a cop needs a better reason.
Quote


Quote

Or a white person in the black part of town or an apparently straight couple in a gay neighborhood.



...Oh, and since when are gay neighborhoods all that territorial? Would a "seemingly" straight couple look out of place there?



The gay scenario was just an effort to point out when do you stop. Plus see the possible scenario I gave Ron above.

Quote


In my book, the more people cops talk to on the street, the better things are in the neighborhood. Then again, I don't think every badge-wearer is the enemy of things decent and wholesome.



I agree but they have to get out of the damned cars and walk the streets and get to know people not just stop and hassle the folks they think are trouble makers.


"Truth is tough. It will not break, like a bubble, at a touch; nay, you may kick it about all day like a football, and it will be round and full at evening."
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

questioned = detained.



Incorrect.



Not to you perhaps.

If I can't go about my business, I'm being detained. Note that this is not the same as arrested.

And anyone claiming that they don't mind the inconvenience of being held up for 15 minutes without cause is someone who never has to worry about it happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0