CanuckInUSA 0 #1 September 1, 2004 All I have to say is that the guy is brilliant and Republicans are ####### idiots for supporting GWB instead of this guy (big money talks I guess). I know I'm 4 years too late with this. But ... Oh by the way Canada beat the USA tonight 2-1. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #2 September 1, 2004 This thread would be better if it was called "Jenny McCarthy," and had photos attached. Blue skies, --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jazzjumper 0 #3 September 1, 2004 Brilliant? You don't follow John McCain much do you? He's okay, but not much of a straight party guy. As far as all us Republicans are idiots for not supporting him? So, you'd rather have Gore or Kerry as President? That is what would happen. Oh yeah, but you're a Canadian. Sorry, you vote doesn't count. No matter how good she looks, someone, somewhere is sick of her shit! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #4 September 1, 2004 QuoteSo, you'd rather have Gore or Kerry as President? That is what would happen. I doubt it. I'd vote for McCain between those 3. And know a lot of other people who are voting for Kerry who would as well. I think he'd win in a landslide. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mcrocker 0 #5 September 1, 2004 QuoteQuoteSo, you'd rather have Gore or Kerry as President? That is what would happen. I doubt it. I'd vote for McCain between those 3. And know a lot of other people who are voting for Kerry who would as well. I think he'd win in a landslide. I agree, I almost hope Kerry wins this election so McCain can run in '08. I haven't followed much of his voting record but he seems to be a straight shooter/honest kinda guy. If Bush wins then it will be Cheney in '08. Cheney can't win an election, maybe the Republicans will give McCain the nod then. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
white_falcon 0 #6 September 1, 2004 Cheney will NOT run in "08. He could not win, and he has already said MANY times he will not run for public office again, which is a wise thing. My vote is Mccain '08 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peregrinerose 0 #7 September 1, 2004 I'm registered independent because I pretty much am disgusted with everybody. But I defintely would vote for McCain. Jen Do or do not, there is no try -Yoda Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #8 September 1, 2004 QuoteIt will be Cheney in '08. Cheney has questionable health (bad heart). Will he even be around in 4 years? Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #9 September 1, 2004 Condi Rice in '08. Of course, everyone would prefer JACKASS '08 but that probably won't happen, as I'd never be able to win a Republican primary with my desire to legalize marijuana. And the fact that I am not a Republican, I just vote for them in national elections. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crwtom 0 #10 September 1, 2004 QuoteQuoteIt will be Cheney in '08. Cheney has questionable health (bad heart). Will he even be around in 4 years? yeah - with this duo Hastert has a good shot at the WH. GWB has that tendency to knock himself out with pretzels and scooters and Cheney may have a "malfunction" with one of those metal detectors. Good grief! ******************************************************************* Fear causes hesitation, and hesitation will cause your worst fears to come true Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #11 September 1, 2004 QuoteOh yeah, but you're a Canadian. Sorry, you vote doesn't count. Yes I am your classic taxation without representation case. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jazzjumper 0 #12 September 1, 2004 QuoteI doubt it. I'd vote for McCain between those 3. And know a lot of other people who are voting for Kerry who would as well. I think he'd win in a landslide. Well, yeah, if it were McCain, Gore, or Kerry, McCain would win in a landslide (today, not in 2000). However, if McCain could beat Bush, he would have the nomination. QuoteI agree, I almost hope Kerry wins this election so McCain can run in '08. I haven't followed much of his voting record but he seems to be a straight shooter/honest kinda guy. Okay, but McCain won't get the Republican node in 08. He knows the republican base (necessary to his election) wouldn't show. QuoteIf Bush wins then it will be Cheney in '08. Cheney can't win an election, maybe the Republicans will give McCain the nod then. Cheney probably won't run in 08 due to his health. Frankly, McCain will probably not be a factor in the next campaign. George Bush will win in Nov, and whomever he annoints will get the Republican node in 2008. It's the way politics are done in the US. No matter how good she looks, someone, somewhere is sick of her shit! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jazzjumper 0 #13 September 1, 2004 QuoteYes I am your classic taxation without representation case. You can fix that...apply for citizenship when you are eligible. No matter how good she looks, someone, somewhere is sick of her shit! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #14 September 1, 2004 QuoteYou can fix that...apply for citizenship when you are eligible. I don't mean to be too confrontational, but are you familiar with this process or is this just a blanket statement? Too many Americans think that someone like myself (I am a skilled/experienced software engineer) can just show up and say "Hey I want to be an American" and the next thing you know [stamp] you're a yank. INS is actually a bunch of assholes to myself every year and I basically have to fight with them just to get accepted for another year or work eligility. I know it's nothing more than a power trip to them (seeing me sweat), but it's just the reality I have to live with in order to work in the USA. So becoming a citizen isn't even close to being on my mind. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #15 September 1, 2004 QuoteINS is actually a bunch of assholes to myself every year and I basically have to fight with them just to get accepted for another year or work eligility. Well, it's to keep the tide of ice backs from stealing our jobs Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #16 September 1, 2004 QuoteWell, it's to keep the tide of ice backs from stealing our jobs LOL ... you guys are just afraid that us ice backs might actually breed with your women and create better hockey players than what you're able to create. Canada 2 - USA 1 Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #17 September 1, 2004 QuoteQuoteWell, it's to keep the tide of ice backs from stealing our jobs LOL ... you guys are just afraid that us ice backs might actually breed with your women and create better hockey players than what you're able to create. Canada 2 - USA 1 I haven't seen the roster this year, but it seems to me, your best players in year's past were usually eastern europeans Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TomAiello 26 #18 September 1, 2004 QuoteLOL ... you guys are just afraid that us ice backs might actually breed with your women and create better hockey players than what you're able to create. Canada 2 - USA 1 Hockey...hockey...hmmm.... Is that the sport where they slide the big rocks around on the ice? Wait, no, that's curling. Hmmm. What's this "hockey" sport, again? -- Tom Aiello Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com SnakeRiverBASE.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #19 September 1, 2004 QuoteI haven't seen the roster this year, but it seems to me, your best players in year's past were usually eastern europeans I'm not talking about NHL teams. Plus we'll just have to see who wins the World Cup. The Czechs are struggling and the Russians and Slovaks have yet to play (Eastern Europe). Sweden looks to be poised to be 2-0 and Finland is 1-0 (Western Europe). Canada (with Canadian born players) beat the USA (with a Canadian born player on their roster) last night 2-1. Of course it's still early in the tourney and the marbles won't be out on the table until this time next week. Of course what does this all have to do with John McCain? I'm hiijacking my own thread. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #20 September 1, 2004 QuoteCanada (with Canadian born players) beat the USA (with a Canadian born player on their roster) last night 2-1. Yeah, cause the damn ice backs come down here and don't work to their full potential. Lazy immigrants. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jib 0 #21 September 1, 2004 QuoteLOL ... you guys are just afraid that us ice backs might actually breed with your women and create better hockey players than what you're able to create. Actually, I think we need you to send more women like Pam Anderson for we can have better hockey players, yeah, that's why. -------------------------------------------------- the depth of his depravity sickens me. -- Jerry Falwell, People v. Larry Flynt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jazzjumper 0 #22 September 1, 2004 QuoteI don't mean to be too confrontational, but are you familiar with this process or is this just a blanket statement? Yes, I'm quite familiar with it. My g/f is a permanent resident who will be applying shortly. Are you a permanent resident yet? If not, why not? Get your company to sponsor you. Hell, pay the fee yourself if you really want to be a citizen. Rather than bitch about the people running the process (like so many Americans do), just go out and do it. Yeah it's a pain, yes it takes time, yes, you must deal with the INS feather merchants. But to say you aren't applying it's because the INS are a bunch of assholes, don't hate the player, hate the game. No matter how good she looks, someone, somewhere is sick of her shit! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #23 September 1, 2004 I know several people who have lived here since they were kids but haven't become US citizens for one main reason. They don't want to have to relenquish citizenship to their old country. One guy I know has a british father, german mother, and was born in Mexico so has 3 way citizenship. He's lived here since he was an infant, but doesn't want to give that up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jazzjumper 0 #24 September 1, 2004 Quote He's lived here since he was an infant, but doesn't want to give that up. No problem....his vote doesn't count either. Choice is a cool thing. No matter how good she looks, someone, somewhere is sick of her shit! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,544 #25 September 1, 2004 QuoteWell, yeah, if it were McCain, Gore, or Kerry, McCain would win in a landslide (today, not in 2000). However, if McCain could beat Bush, he would have the nomination. In 2000, I would have willingly voted for McCain over Gore (and certainly over Bush). I'd've had a hard time thinking about it had it been McCain vs. Bradley. I know an awful lot of Democrats (and non-Democrat liberals and independents) who think like me, and quite a few Republicans who liked McCain. Putting Bush forward was in some ways a power play -- "we Republicans will take control of the country in any damn way we want to, and you'll just have to live with it." And whoever Bush "anoints" might actually have to do something in an election to win; it's not really particularly automatic, if you look at the past. Frankly, anyone that Bush would anoint would be more a reflection of his handlers and the party hacks than of him personally -- more machine politics. Just what we need Oh -- and my vote counts. Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
