Recommended Posts
I admire his determination, unlike his opponent who has never stuck with anything long enough to see it through. And yes that determination is a plus. It is very hard to stay the path with so many trying to pick a new path for us. If everyone would respect him and his position long enough, I wonder what we all could accomplish. Delusional?? For every person who says that, there is one who says the opposite. This country is split down the middle on almost every major issue of both parties platforms.
You know the one thing that I just can't get is that the Dems are generally the party of the working man. The Repubs are generally said to be the party of the uppercrust. Then why in the world would a working man Dem pick a billionaire, and expect that billionaire to have his best interests at heart. WTF???
Why would the Dems who values 1st amendment rights in such high esteem, want to trash the 2nd amendment which got them that right in the first place?
Why would the Dems who want to abolish the death penalty, think its ok to kill babies?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a Repub., but I tend to agree with them more than not on a lot of issues.
I think the Democratic party should be renamed the Parodox party. Its only fitting that John Kerry is leading that party right now.
As far as Bush, I think he's just a man. Unlike some on here, I don't immortalize him. I think he does make mistakes and could have done a lot better. What I don't see is the huge set of Parodox's that I see with Kerry. Sorry, I just don't get it, but I'm sure you guys will enlighten me.
You know the one thing that I just can't get is that the Dems are generally the party of the working man. The Repubs are generally said to be the party of the uppercrust. Then why in the world would a working man Dem pick a billionaire, and expect that billionaire to have his best interests at heart. WTF???
Why would the Dems who values 1st amendment rights in such high esteem, want to trash the 2nd amendment which got them that right in the first place?
Why would the Dems who want to abolish the death penalty, think its ok to kill babies?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a Repub., but I tend to agree with them more than not on a lot of issues.
I think the Democratic party should be renamed the Parodox party. Its only fitting that John Kerry is leading that party right now.
As far as Bush, I think he's just a man. Unlike some on here, I don't immortalize him. I think he does make mistakes and could have done a lot better. What I don't see is the huge set of Parodox's that I see with Kerry. Sorry, I just don't get it, but I'm sure you guys will enlighten me.
QuoteJust make this perfectly clear for me . . . you see that as a plus?!?
Yes. It's called dedication and determination.
I understand the last president you guys had with those traits was Kennedy but believe it or not those exist with in leaders today...Bush being one of them.
Forty-two
"Democrats vs. Republicans"
What...no room for a Social Socialist? bah!
What...no room for a Social Socialist? bah!
--------------------
He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. Thomas Jefferson
He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. Thomas Jefferson
PhreeZone 20
>I admire his determination, unlike his opponent who has never stuck with anything long enough to see it through.
Contrary to popular belief Kerry actually follows through on a lot of things. I'll name just one since even if I spend my time listing 100 someone here will say thats not proof of anything.
He created the first Earth day and assisted in setting up various grants to further the development and promotion of it. He is still actively involved in that project over 20 years after it started.
Contrary to popular belief Kerry actually follows through on a lot of things. I'll name just one since even if I spend my time listing 100 someone here will say thats not proof of anything.
He created the first Earth day and assisted in setting up various grants to further the development and promotion of it. He is still actively involved in that project over 20 years after it started.
Yesterday is history
And tomorrow is a mystery
Parachutemanuals.com
And tomorrow is a mystery
Parachutemanuals.com
kallend 2,027
QuoteQuoteJust make this perfectly clear for me . . . you see that as a plus?!?
Yes. It's called dedication and determination.
I understand the last president you guys had with those traits was Kennedy but believe it or not those exist with in leaders today...Bush being one of them.
The last three coaches of the Chicago Bears have had dedication and determination. Lots of losing seasons, too. Sticking with a failed strategy is not a sign of a good leader, but an inept one.
Bush has mismanaged the war
Bush has mismanaged the aftermath of the war
Bush has failed to capture OBL
Bush has mismanaged the economy
And he just grins his stupid grin and tells us how hard it is being president (1st debate, 2004).
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
billvon 2,991
>I think the Democratic party should be renamed the Parodox party.
As opposed to the republican party, who:
-claim they are for smaller government, but have created the largest increase in federal spending in history.
-claim they are for fiscal responsibility, but have overseen the creation of th largest deficit ever
-claim they are for constutional protections, but decimate them with the Patriot Act
You have noticed that the democratic party has a lot of inherent contradictions, which is quite true. The republican party does too. Why? Because both parties will say whatever it takes to get elected. If the Bush campaign discovered that saying "oompa loompa oompity do" would get Bush a few more points in the polls, he'd be imitating an oompa loompa before the week was out. Same with Kerry.
As opposed to the republican party, who:
-claim they are for smaller government, but have created the largest increase in federal spending in history.
-claim they are for fiscal responsibility, but have overseen the creation of th largest deficit ever
-claim they are for constutional protections, but decimate them with the Patriot Act
You have noticed that the democratic party has a lot of inherent contradictions, which is quite true. The republican party does too. Why? Because both parties will say whatever it takes to get elected. If the Bush campaign discovered that saying "oompa loompa oompity do" would get Bush a few more points in the polls, he'd be imitating an oompa loompa before the week was out. Same with Kerry.
oh shit...now you're going to kick off the firestorm of highly relevant and important posts about Kerry's tan!!
Quote
You have noticed that the democratic party has a lot of inherent contradictions, which is quite true. The republican party does too. Why? Because both parties will say whatever it takes to get elected.Quote
I can agree with that.
Just make this perfectly clear for me . . . you see that as a plus?!?
I don't know about you, but I'd much rather have a guy in charge that is at least a little flexible when it comes to utilizing new information. I'd like a guy that can admit his mistakes and not simply hold onto delusional ideas that what was once thought to be right is still right even when proven wrong.
The World's Most Boring Skydiver
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites