A Christian Republican issues a wake up call to Security Moms

[free_man 0]

A Christian Republican issues a wake up call to Security Moms

By Karl W. B. Schwarz
Online Journal Guest Writer

October 2, 2004—I have been seeing articles, such as "Wooing Moms" by Orlando Sentinel columnist Kathleen Parker, and listening to "talking heads" regarding a possible election year phenomenon that the Soccer Moms are morphing into the "Security Moms" and going with Bush because they feel more secure. I hate to burst your bubbles ladies, but you need to wake up and pay attention if you love your children.

I am a Conservative Christian Republican and not voting for Bush—Cheney for a multitude of reasons including some reasons you need to know about if you think your children are "safer serving under Bush" than with Kerry.

The following are excerpts of a letter I am sending to George W. Bush demanding that he address 30 items regarding the truth. He will of course not do so, but Americans are waking up when they see "hard questions" and "no answers" from Mr. Bush.

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/100204Schwarz/100204schwarz.html

“…because I hope you know this, I think you do…all governments are lying cocksuckers.”
Bill Hicks, Relentless

[free_man 0]

>>This has also been sent to the Kerry campaign.

Here’s a letter to Bush from a man who calls himself a Conservative
Christian Republican. It’s too bad that there aren’t more Conservative
Christian Republicans like him. You might want to send this letter to your
Republican friends, the ones who can still think. Maybe they will see the
light and understand. Maybe.



September 30, 2004 By Email, By Facsimile to
White House

Mr. President,



I am a Conservative Christian Republican that has no intentions of voting
for you in this year's election and many other Conservative Republicans are
following me.



America demands the TRUTH and not after the elections; this nation demands
the truth from you RIGHT NOW! This letter and an identical email will be
going out to hundreds of thousands by me, millions by others. The following
content was sent to the White House by facsimile earlier today from Ground
Zero in New York City.



1. I demand as an American citizen that you lift the "gag order" on Sibel
D. Edmonds and let Americans know what foreign names and what AMERICAN NAMES
she uncovered in her FBI translations that were involved in drug
trafficking, money laundering and the financing of 9-11. Her facts and your
"official story" lies do not add up. Americans demand the truth on that
matter before the election.



2. I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy Task
Force meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be
taken to remove the Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining
obstacle to the United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I
met that company in 1999 and have known since then about the Bridas v
Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit in US District Court,
Southern District of Texas. I also know about the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million
arbitration settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari
at the United States Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas.



3. I demand to know how many prisoners are being held at GITMO and other
places that are either BRIDAS EMPLOYEES or are persons that know all about
Bridas Corporation and what your administration did to get control of that
Trans-Afghanistan pipeline.



4. I demand to know how many board meetings Condoleezza Rice and
Thomas Kean sat in on at Chevron and Amerada Hess where it was discussed how
they were going to deal with making the billions in "Big Oil" investments
into a land locked Caspian Basin and how to get rid of the Taliban and
Bridas so they could turn those investments into cash flow. How many times
did Big Oil ask for military force to complete a commercial transaction they
could not get under their control, and on what exact date did you agree to
provide such military force - prior to 9-11? Isn’t it true Mr. Bush that
the Cheney Energy Task Force discussed that attack on Afghanistan and
removal of the Taliban / Bridas obstacle once and for all – and did so well
in advance of 9-11?



5. I demand to know why you appointed 10 persons to the 9-11 Commission,
8 of which are directly benefiting by the Taliban / Bridas "contract"
obstacle being removed - breached with military force, and the big Caspian
Oil deals that are now coming to market. No, America does not 'thank you'
for that nor do we hold such despicable conduct up high.



6. I demand to know what US Oil Company stepped up as the sponsor of that
OPIC and Asia Development Bank funded Trans-Afghanistan pipeline and what US
company is constructing that pipeline right now, and what US firms are
supplying the key components and their relationship to your administration.



7. I demand that you identify the company and persons who were going
around Bridas to be "natural gas suppliers" to the US owned natural gas
electrical generation plants in Pakistan (Dynegy - Illinova /Tenaska, El
Paso (2 OPIC financed transactions) and others.



8. I demand to know why you have not been truthful with the American
public that your GWOT and military policy are protecting the Caspian Basin
Oil and Gas deals for many of your Bush Pioneers, some $9.6 trillion in oil
and about $3 trillion in natural gas, now mostly in the hands of your elite
wealthy contributors and some elite Liberals to keep this all quiet.



9. I demand to know what role the post-bankruptcy ENRON (Prisma Energy
International, Cayman Islands) is playing in the Caspian Basin area, the
same Enron that uses the law firm of Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw [Richard Ben
Veniste, 9-11 Commission] that established the offshore SPE's for assets
that were never under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court.



10. I demand to know why you appointed Richard Ben Veniste to the 9-11
Commission when it was his law firm that was stalling Bridas Corporation at
the Fifth Circuit US Court of Appeals in the matter of Bridas Corporation v.
Turkmenneft and his law firm is directly involved in Pakistan, Turkmenistan,
Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan and your administration.



11. I demand to know the exact date of the order that had our military
practicing in early 2001 the invasion of Afghanistan to take out the Taliban
and Bridas Corporation and make that pipeline under control of US interests,
many of your Bush Pioneers, and the exact date that our military started
practicing and preparing for that invasion.



12. I demand to know who Remington Holdings Ltd is, and Western
Acquisitions, Inc, both Baker & Botts clients and the lucky recipients of
OPIC financing to acquire oil and gas deposits in Pakistan. Who are the
parties involved in those entities by name and benefited from such
governmental magnanimity? Is this transaction a payoff? Since American
taxpayers are footing the bill, we have the right to know - right now.



13. I demand to know why you could not find 10 people to sit on the 9-11
Commission that are not directly benefiting from the actions you have taken
and the lives you have cost or otherwise ruined. Why would you select
people not motivated to find the truth for that would impact “their bottom
line”?



14. I demand a full disclosure from your administration as to the Citibank
/ IFTRIC / OPIC / Export-Import Bank financing of American / Israeli based
deals in Islamic nations on behalf of your major campaign contributors.



"IFTRIC and Citibank have an agreement allowing Citibank to finance approved
IFTRIC-backed transactions. Citibank Israel CEO Nandan Mar said: ‘The
Citibank branch, and the Structured Trade Finance Group, view IFTRIC’s
program as a basic product for the bank’s domestic activities.’"



I see distinct differences between "terrorism" and "outrage" (Shurtan II) at
your policies.



15. I demand to know why you wanted an entire new division of the CIA for
Argentina. As an American citizen I take umbrage to your belligerence
towards a nation that is not an enemy of the United States by any stretch of
the imagination, except possibly yours. It is abundantly clear that your
intentions were solely to intimidate Argentina and Argentina based Bridas
Corporation into silence and that is NOT AMERICA. That has every appearance
of the United States acting as the terrorist and a state sponsor of
terrorism. Yes, you are wrapped in a flag but I clearly see that it is not
the one you purport it to be.



16. I demand to know why your administration has never disclosed that
DynPort Vaccine, LLC, owned by DynCorp and now owned by Computer Sciences
Corporation, a Bush Pioneer, is a possible source for where the weaponized
Ames Strain of anthrax came from that was used against this nation. How did
your administration manage to miss one of your campaign contributors and a
company doing large volumes of business with your administration and even
being known euphemistically (DynCorp) as The Mercenary Company? Who put
that Contract on America?



17. I demand to know how you can claim a pretense of being a Christian
while sponsoring and condoning the torture of prisoners, including
sodomizing children, at Abu Ghraib prison.



18. I demand to know how your administration can send firms overseas as
"representatives of this nation" that were convicted of running a flesh
trade in little girls in Bosnia, specifically one DynCorp. Convicted in
Texas and the United Kingdom according to reports I have seen and apparently
detested in Afghanistan. You do recall that DynCorp is the company
providing security to protect your puppet Karzai in Afghanistan and your
other puppet Zalmay Khalilzad is deterring anyone from running for President
in that bogus “free” democracy?



19. I demand to know why your administration keeps running the name and
photos of Adnan G. El Shukrijumah as the "dirty bomb boogeyman" and on March
25, 2003 the FBI knew exactly where to find him and did not go after him.
That telephone call was made from my telephone by a Canadian friend that was
in Little Rock on that date, Mr. Bush, so do not pretend "national security"
with me. I am "first person" on this matter and all of America deserves to
know the extent that your administration has been and is lying to us all –
and someone that is not Al Qaeda is probably “dropping a suspect name” as
they set up a dirty bomb attack. Sure have pushed up the oil and gas prices
with your strategy though, guess we can consider that another "Mission
Accomplished".



20. I demand to know why your administration keeps referring to Adnan
G. El Shukrijumah as a “Saudi” when the FBI knows full well he is not Saudi.
His family is from Guyana in South America and they have lived in Florida
since 1986 without incident. His grandparents were from Yemen, moved long
ago to South America and his mother is from Trinidad & Tobago.



21. I demand to know why you alerted India, Pakistan and "Axis of Evil"
member Iran of your intentions to attack the Taliban / Bridas well before
9-11, and not notify the citizens of this nation. That matter was reported
on June 26, 2001 in India newspapers.



22. I demand to know the exact date that the first meeting, first page of
the Patriot Act was started by your administration.



23. I demand to know why it is you, your backers, certain Democrats
that apparently “hate our freedoms” more than these purported GWOT Islamic
fundamentalists, hence the Patriot Act that treats all Americans with the
same degree of contempt and disdain you treat all non-wealthy Americans.



24. I demand to know why Homeland Security is protecting this
government and not protecting this nation.



25. I demand to know why any dissent or objections to your Orwellian,
imperialistic, pro-corporate agenda is referred to the Homeland Security
Counter-Terrorism Division.



26. I demand to know why you defile everything you touch and try to
twist it into something that is pro-Bush Backers and anti-American citizens
and then try to alter our rights as Americans via Patriot Act measures that
are designed to force America into submission and does nothing to protect
this nation, only this government.



27. I demand to know why your administration is planning a “pro-Bush
Pioneers pharmaceutical program” derived from TMAP (Texas Medical Algorithm
Project) and PENNMAP (Tom Ridge, Pennsylvania) to have Americans tested
under guidelines prepared by your Bush Pioneers and force psychotropic drugs
on Americans.



28. I demand to know why your administration keeps injecting our troops
with an anthrax vaccine known to be deadly and harmful to the health of our
soldiers and now apparently wish to inject that into all Americans under
Project BioShield and martial law. Is that why you have no concern
whatsoever for the 3 million jobs lost, for between your TMAP lunacy and
Project BioShield lunacy, well over 3 million Americans could perish if the
same statistical rates hit the general population as has hit our military?
Can you explain away Holocaust with “brilliant strategy policy” driven by
unmitigated greed?



29. I demand to know why Li Ka-shing was denied Global Crossing on
national security grounds (very public) yet allow him in the back door in
Savi Technology (not disclosed), the RFID technology company that is
purportedly protecting our ports from insertion of a nuclear bomb into this
nation via “ocean going containers”. How many doors are left wide open by
your administration in this GWOT Fable?



30. I demand to know why you search the world for mythical terrorists
and cannot find robber barons and financial terrorist right under your nose.
That many of them are Bush Pioneers and even backers of the Democratic
Party, and have plundered the investors, workers and citizens of this
nation, is very apparent to Americans and not very pro-family on your part.



Christians do not lie, Mr. Bush, for that is an affront to God. A Christian
would not willfully mislead this nation, nor send our troops into Harm’s Way
for a lie while your wealthy contributors take over a $9.6 trillion oil,
$3.0 trillion natural gas deal and already maneuvering for Africa. You are
proving to the world that you are terrified of the truth and have impeded
every



President George W. Bush

Page 5

September 30, 2004



investigation into the truth. Your actions prove that you are not an
upstanding Christian, nor are you a Conservative Republican worthy of that
designation.



Your position as President does not make you unaccountable to the citizens
of this nation, nor does it entitle you to act as a tyrant, an emperor, or
serving only those Americans that dole out money for your political
ambitions and agendas. I see no “stewardship” in your conduct whatsoever.



You have "Mission Accomplished" three times - the removal of Taliban /
Bridas to control that pipeline, radically escalated the price of oil and
gas for some of your major backers, and the death and maiming of many due to
your lies. Your "Iraq Strategery" makes perfect sense to me, since all of
you needed a diversion away from Afghanistan, the Caspian Basin and what you
did to Bridas Corporation to get control of that $9.6 trillion in oil, $3
trillion in natural gas.



Go back home and wrap yourself in the flag of Texas and the shame you alone
are responsible for creating. Your resume is your doing and yours alone.



If you were running against me this year, you would not have the guts to
stay on the stage in a debate with me.



Shame on all of you, both sides of the aisle that have lied to America and
gotten so many killed and maimed for a lie, and no, I am not an antiwar
person. Just adamantly opposed to what you stand for, for that is lower
than Clinton on his worst day.



Sincerely,

“…because I hope you know this, I think you do…all governments are lying cocksuckers.”
Bill Hicks, Relentless

[crwmike 0]

Quote

A Christian Republican issues a wake up call to Security Moms

By Karl W. B. Schwarz
Online Journal Guest Writer

October 2, 2004—I have been seeing articles, such as "Wooing Moms" by Orlando Sentinel columnist Kathleen Parker, and listening to "talking heads" regarding a possible election year phenomenon that the Soccer Moms are morphing into the "Security Moms" and going with Bush because they feel more secure. I hate to burst your bubbles ladies, but you need to wake up and pay attention if you love your children.

I am a Conservative Christian Republican and not voting for Bush—Cheney for a multitude of reasons including some reasons you need to know about if you think your children are "safer serving under Bush" than with Kerry.

The following are excerpts of a letter I am sending to George W. Bush demanding that he address 30 items regarding the truth. He will of course not do so, but Americans are waking up when they see "hard questions" and "no answers" from Mr. Bush.

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/100204Schwarz/100204schwarz.html

Well, that site was pretty much a load of crap.

However ...

I'm voting against Bush. I fear the erosion of freedoms that made us the greatest country in the world's history. I love my country and strongly oppose Bush and string pullers selling the daily fear that propels well intended good people to surrender the soul of this great country ...for illusion.

Kerry? Just another lying, cocksucking politician ...but the more benign of two, and the only viable option to stop freedom's inexorable suffocationI could actually warm to Kerry quite a bit if he would stand at the debate and shout (to Bush), "You facist, oil pimping, fear mongering pig! You're hijacking our great nation for power, profit and ego ..and for our great nation to survice, you must be stopped!"

Now, I expect Bush will be reelected. There's a shitload of power, money and dictatorial ideology on his side of the scale, but I pretty much understand that and expect that. What saddens me and what's going to re-elect him is, people ate the fear. It's now consuming them and they must believe that chest beating, war-talking, erection baring alpha males will make them safe.

That's the way it's been for a few million years and when the tribe feels threatened, that's the way it still is.

BSBD,

Michael

[DrunkMonkey 0]

This guy (the site author) is campaigning for Commander of the Tinfoil Hat Brigade. The cheese fell off this guy's cracker a long time ago...

[free_man 0]

Radio interviews, need subscription
http://www.meria.net/subscribers/interviews/karl_schwarz_911_omissions.html

Will also be on show October 20, 2004. Call in and give him hell.

“…because I hope you know this, I think you do…all governments are lying cocksuckers.”
Bill Hicks, Relentless

[sundevil777 102]

Quote

24. I demand to know why Homeland Security is protecting this
government and not protecting this nation.

25. I demand to know why any dissent or objections to your Orwellian,
imperialistic, pro-corporate agenda is referred to the Homeland Security
Counter-Terrorism Division.

This sounds like the ravings of a loony. You wish to be associated with this?

edit-Isn't there anything about Bush being responsible for AIDS?

People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am

[skycop806 0]

Quote

This guy (the site author) is campaigning for Commander of the Tinfoil Hat Brigade. The cheese fell off this guy's cracker a long time ago...

I'm sitting behind a desk, writing reports, passing time, and read this forum..and begin to literally LAUGH OUT LOUD at this! It's sooo TRUE! That guy should have been the star of Conspiracy Theory, the movie! Phew!!

[Michele 1]

Quote

What saddens me and what's going to re-elect him is, people ate the fear. It's now consuming them and they must believe that chest beating, war-talking, erection baring alpha males will make them safe.

I am voting for Bush. I am not voting for him because I "feel safer" or that I "ate the fear" (great phrase, by the way), but because I would feel "less safe" with Kerry. There are many other reasons, but that's the one you're addressing in your post.

Just thought I'd point out that not all people who're voting for Bush are doing so because they "ate the fear."

Ciels-
Michele

~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

[peacefuljeffrey 0]

Quote

Quote

What saddens me and what's going to re-elect him is, people ate the fear. It's now consuming them and they must believe that chest beating, war-talking, erection baring alpha males will make them safe.

I am voting for Bush. I am not voting for him because I "feel safer" or that I "ate the fear" (great phrase, by the way), but because I would feel "less safe" with Kerry. There are many other reasons, but that's the one you're addressing in your post.

Just thought I'd point out that not all people who're voting for Bush are doing so because they "ate the fear."

Ciels-
Michele

Well, for one thing, Kerry is hard after banning us from being able to own guns. On a personal level, guns are the most useful items for personal protection. Sure, I can't use a personal arm to shoot down missiles launched at my country -- but that's for our military to do.

But look to Israel, where terrorist suicide bombers are, now and then, shot dead by armed civilians before they can detonate themselves. I even read sometime not long ago about an armed woman in Israel stopping such a bombing by shooting the bomber!

Kerry parrots a bullshit line that he believes in "the 2nd amendment as interpreted" -- which means, "as interpreted to mean only if you're in the national guard may you have a gun.

He accepts, as a gift, a shotgun of a type he voted to ban.

He cynically blames Bush for not extending the bogus "assault weapons ban" -- but if that was a bad thing, it was Congress' fault, for not sending a bill to Bush to sign!

Kerry is a liar who tries to get pro-gun votes by bullshitting us and pretending he's a gun owner "just like us." Suuuure you are, Senator. You know all about protecting oneself while living at the edge of a crappy area, or having to work late at night and drive home on deserted streets through bad areas that must be traversed to get home. I sure wish I had bodyguards like you do, so I wouldn't feel the need to arm myself in case I find myself in trouble with violent criminals.

I wouldn't vote for Kerry in a thousand years.

-Jeffrey

-Jeffrey
"With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!"

[crwmike 0]

Quote

Quote

What saddens me and what's going to re-elect him is, people ate the fear. It's now consuming them and they must believe that chest beating, war-talking, erection baring alpha males will make them safe.

I am voting for Bush. I am not voting for him because I "feel safer" or that I "ate the fear" (great phrase, by the way), but because I would feel "less safe" with Kerry. There are many other reasons, but that's the one you're addressing in your post.

Just thought I'd point out that not all people who're voting for Bush are doing so because they "ate the fear."

Ciels-
Michele

I know darlin. Like I said, people ]must believe. If people didnt truly believe they would be safer with Bush (or less safe with Kerry), they would have to accept they are falling back to the most primitive of solutions to ward away evil during the dark, scary night. Too much cognitive dissonance.

Not to worry. He'll be re-elected and you can feel safe.

Michael

[Michele 1]

Morning, Mike.

I understand your point completely, but rest assured, I'm not one of those quailing females who require "erection baring alpha males" to protect me...LOL. I'm fairly capable of protecting myself.

However, I think perhaps I should clarify something from my first post (which may have been poorly written.) I am voting for Bush for myriad reasons, and one of those is not because "I feel safer." Rather, having watched the increase of terrorism for many years, and being one of those who figured sooner or later there would be an attack on US soil (although not at all the way - or magnitude - that 9/11 occurred), I have chosen to vote for Bush (again, for many reasons...) in part because Kerry has no viable, different, better "plan" to combat terrorism, either here or abroad. Comparatively, Kerry has no difference in his plan to handle terrorism; or put another way, his "plan" is not viable, cannot be implemented, and thus we will be at the same place we are now.

On a national level, I believe that Bush has done better at handling any threat than Kerry would; on a personal level, I believe that *I* will do better than both of them for my own life. On a national level, we remain at risk for a similar attack as we did on 9/10...and on a personal level, I am at exactly the same risk, as well.

And BTW, scare tactics about fear come from both sides, and not simply from the Republicans.

And while you're sure Bush will win, I'm not; whomever wins, I am *still* responsible for myself, and my own personal safety (which I'm capable of dealing with...quite handily, as a matter of fact).

Ciels-
Michele

~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

[crwmike 0]

Morning, Mike.

I understand your point completely, but rest assured, I'm not one of those quailing females who require "erection baring alpha males" to protect me...LOL. I'm fairly capable of protecting myself.

Quote

Good morning, Michele. Come on now, darlin, don't give the pink people more girst to grind. Has nothing to do with gender. As a nation, we got a major surplus of cowering for bother genders.

We could have discussions on exactly what the threats are, what we are doing about them and the results of those efforts, but who is going to change their mind ...Not I

***However, I think perhaps I should clarify something from my first post (which may have been poorly written.) I am voting for Bush for myriad reasons, and one of those is not because "I feel safer." Rather, having watched the increase of terrorism for many years, and being one of those who figured sooner or later there would be an attack on US soil (although not at all the way - or magnitude - that 9/11 occurred), I have chosen to vote for Bush (again, for many reasons...) in part because Kerry has no viable, different, better "plan" to combat terrorism, either here or abroad. Comparatively, Kerry has no difference in his plan to handle terrorism; or put another way, his "plan" is not viable, cannot be implemented, and thus we will be at the same place we are now.

On a national level, I believe that Bush has done better at handling any threat than Kerry would; on a personal level, I believe that *I* will do better than both of them for my own life. On a national level, we remain at risk for a similar attack as we did on 9/10...and on a personal level, I am at exactly the same risk, as well.

And BTW, scare tactics about fear come from both sides, and not simply from the Republicans.

Well at a bare bones minimum he has convinced people we have to sacrafice what makes this country great in order to preserve it's existence. Maybe he's right.


Blues!

Michael