rhino 0 #1 October 19, 2004 You need to read the 911 commission report first. After spending the weekend reading it I WOULDN'T VOTE FOR BUSH IF HE WAS OUR ONLY OPTION. READ IT!!!! Our countries future depends on it. I can't believe some of the things I read that Bush did immediately following 9/11. What a fucking MORON!!!!!!! Rhino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nigel99 473 #2 October 19, 2004 sorry Rhino I couldn't resist quoting this statement you made. So have you joined "the Kerry gang"? Quote You, Kallend, and PhillyKev should just to get some John Kerry for President signs and start marching down the highway in the bumper to bumper rush hour traffic.Experienced jumper - someone who has made mistakes more often than I have and lived. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhino 0 #3 October 19, 2004 QuoteSo have you joined "the Kerry gang"? I haven't joined any gang. As I stated I wouldn't vote for Bush if he was our only choice. Kerry "unfortunately" is the only other option. Read the commission report and you will understand.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CrazyIvan 0 #4 October 19, 2004 OH C'MON!!!, If Bush did nothing after 9/11, where you put Clinton, he did NOTHING AT ALL. At least W took Saddam out of power, moreover, during the Clinton administration the 1st bombing of the twin towers happened AND the second attack was planned.__________________________________________ Blue Skies and May the Force be with you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChasingBlueSky 0 #5 October 19, 2004 QuoteAt least W took Saddam out of power, moreover, during the Clinton administration the 1st bombing of the twin towers happened AND the second attack was planned. And there was such strong proof that SH was the cause of 9/11 Clinton and W both failed to bring OBL to justice._________________________________________ you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me.... I WILL fly again..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr2mk1g 10 #6 October 19, 2004 They're not being asked to vote for Clinton Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CrazyIvan 0 #7 October 19, 2004 QuoteClinton and W both failed to bring OBL to justice. Just hang on man...we got SH, OBL is next, that of course if the fucker is not dead already.__________________________________________ Blue Skies and May the Force be with you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michele 1 #8 October 19, 2004 Rhino, I read most of the report. And I'm voting for Bush. Ciels- Michele ~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek While our hearts lie bleeding?~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cgriffin 0 #9 October 19, 2004 QuoteKerry "unfortunately" is the only other option. Well, no. Fortunately, he is not. I've read it, and I agree that Bush doesn't merit my vote. However, as Kerry is even less deserving of it, it will go to the only candidate that actually reads and understands the Constitution: Michael Badnarik. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChasingBlueSky 0 #10 October 19, 2004 QuoteJust hang on man...we got SH, OBL is next, that of course if the fucker is not dead already. And with the reason changing every week on why we had to go to Iraq, I do not currently see that as a positive thing. If you want to toss in mass graves, etc...well, then we should be in the Sudan right NOW. Then there are the rumors of what is happening in Equitorial Guinea. And then there is the fact that the comission said SH had nothing to do with 9/11, which Bush has laid claim to. OBL is still missing. Dead or Alive and missing still makes him a threat to this country. Both Clinton and GW had chances to bring him in or take him out, and both screwed that up. I can't do anything about Clinton now....so I will help vote Bush out of office. If Kerry makes similar mistakes, then I will vote hime out of office in four years as well._________________________________________ you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me.... I WILL fly again..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CrazyIvan 0 #11 October 19, 2004 QuoteBoth Clinton and GW had chances to bring him in or take him out, and both screwed that up. Clinton did nothing, W took some action. Quote....so I will help vote Bush out of office. If Kerry makes similar mistakes, then I will vote him out of office in four years as well. Right, nevermind if in those 4 years terrorist attacks on america are rampant, Iraq and the other countries are afraid of Bush, if you mess with him, he'll bomb the shit out of you, what Kerry would do?, I tell you what, send a squad with daisies and place them into the terrorists gun barrels, we need someone that can do what is necessary to be done, W can do that, Kerry?, he'll be talking about his "medals"__________________________________________ Blue Skies and May the Force be with you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #12 October 19, 2004 I've read excerpts of it and still plan on voting for Bush. Kerry's plans for the economy, health care, defense, and taxation scare the living hell out of me. His stances on social issues are 180 out from my own in most cases. I'm voting against Kerry, therefore I'm voting FOR Bush. They have both angered me, truth be told, but oh well. Bush's political philosophies are far more in line with my own than the most liberal Senator in the Senate's anyway. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freeflydrew 0 #13 October 19, 2004 Quote Right, nevermind if in those 4 years terrorist attacks on america are rampant, Iraq and the other countries are afraid of Bush, if you mess with him, he'll bomb the shit out of you, what Kerry would do?, I tell you what, send a squad with daisies and place them into the terrorists gun barrels, we need someone that can do what is necessary to be done, W can do that, Kerry?, he'll be talking about his "medals" Oh c'mon, we got Saddam!!! Rah Rah Rah! Hoo Rah, Hoo Rah! OBL is next... this is war... blah blah blah... Dude, check yourself and this US domination fear tactic that you think people are actually afraid... There are countries that are actively building nuclear weapons... there are more and more terrorist goups along with other countries angered by this US invasion on Iraq. The world is not any safer because of it, and if anything, we might as well count down the days to the next attack... You have the nerve to blame Clinton for 9/11 when we know that Rice had the memo and Bush ignored it!!! Where are you coming from? Bush's war in Iraq is quickly becoming a total failure and yet you question how Kerry will handle Bush's mess? Very sensible... Look broh', here's what other terrorist groups are thinking... you ready? If you mess with Bush, he'll bomb another country... or he'll go after the oil... or he'll do something that doesn't have anything to do with the real culprit... And you know why they think that? Because Bush focused on Iraq when there was never a connection with 9/11... A fact that will never change. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CrazyIvan 0 #14 October 19, 2004 Quotehow Kerry will handle Bush's mess? Very sensible. I rest my case, you CAN'T be sensible or PC or all that crap with groups like that, you need a gun and some bullets, period. Countries building nukes?, sure, how many? and WE KNOW who they are AND WHERE, now tell me, how many terrorists groups are there?, where are they?, no clue, that's a bigger problem than a country like Korea building nukes.__________________________________________ Blue Skies and May the Force be with you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #15 October 19, 2004 QuoteLook broh', here's what other terrorist groups are thinking... you ready? If you mess with Bush, he'll bomb another country... or he'll go after the oil... or he'll do something that doesn't have anything to do with the real culprit... And you know why they think that? Because Bush focused on Iraq when there was never a connection with 9/11... A fact that will never change. Please provide us with proof you know what you are talking about when you make statements like this. The only reason the WTC didn't fall during Clinton's Presidency is the terrorist f*ck'd up and didn't use enough explosives. That's it. That's the only reason. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #16 October 19, 2004 Rice had the memo and Bush ignored it, eh? Please enlighten us as to which memo you are referring. I hope you're not embarrassing yourself by referring to the infamous PDB... Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #17 October 19, 2004 QuoteClinton did nothing, W took some action. Clinton began military action in the form of cruise missile attacks. And then the republican attack dogs started screaming that he was only trying to divert attention from his blow job. Who knows what path he would have followed if they didn't turn it into a partisan issue? Oh yeah, and Clinton isn't running. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhino 0 #18 October 19, 2004 QuoteI read most of the report. Keep reading... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #19 October 19, 2004 QuoteI read most of the report. Keep reading... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #20 October 19, 2004 QuoteMichael Badnarik. I don't think he is even on the ballot in Michigan? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #21 October 19, 2004 QuoteOBL is still missing. Dead or Alive and missing still makes him a threat to this country. Before we went into Iraq there was 1 OBL... Now we have to deal with hundreds..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites freeflydrew 0 #22 October 19, 2004 QuoteQuoteLook broh', here's what other terrorist groups are thinking... you ready? If you mess with Bush, he'll bomb another country... or he'll go after the oil... or he'll do something that doesn't have anything to do with the real culprit... And you know why they think that? Because Bush focused on Iraq when there was never a connection with 9/11... A fact that will never change. Please provide us with proof you know what you are talking about when you make statements like this. The only reason the WTC didn't fall during Clinton's Presidency is the terrorist f*ck'd up and didn't use enough explosives. That's it. That's the only reason. The fact the the 9/11 commission and the Iraq survey group both found no link between 9/11 and Iraq/Saddam, and we invaded Iraq in response to 9/11 and their "imminent threat" is very logical proof that Bush's response to 9/11 was one that had nothing to do with 9/11. And yes, the WTC would have sustained more damage had more explosives been used, (obviously), and it would have sustained less damage if less explosives had been used... but what does that have to do with anything related to Bush? Nada mucho, amigo... Bush ignored the memo that warned that OBL was preparing to attack the country. In response to 9/11, Bush attacked a country with no link to the WTC. Everyday more soldiers are dying, and the civilian death toll in Iraq has passed 14,000!!! Hello? This election isn't between Bush and Clinton, so stop bringing him up... he hasn't been in office for almost 4 years, and it's time that Bush's reelection be based on his success, or lack there of, and the many mistakes and missed opportunities he's had as a president, and unfortunately, Iraq is quickly moving to the top of that list. To think that Bush's moves since 9/11 is protecting the US because the "enemy" is afraid of being bombed is simply naive and very simple minded... I mean, these guys are doing suicide missions... do you really think they're afraid of being bombed? I don't either... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #23 October 19, 2004 Quotewe need someone that can do what is necessary to be done, True.. But we also need a President that is willing to listen to his experts.. Not the experts that are benefiting in financial ways... After 9/11 Bush asked his experts to find a link between Sadham and 9/11. The CIA, FBI, NSA and others got together and founf nothing. Upon going back to the Pres they were told to FIND SOMETHING. TRY AGAIN. He doesn't listen to his experts, he doesn't factor data and he certainly isn't making educated decisions.. Rhino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #24 October 19, 2004 QuoteRice had the memo and Bush ignored it, eh? Please enlighten us as to which memo you are referring. I hope you're not embarrassing yourself by referring to the infamous PDB... Go to your nearest book store, pick up that big fat 9/11 commission report book and READ IT.. Educate yourself for Christs sake!!! Come on people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rhino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites freeflydrew 0 #25 October 19, 2004 Didn't you see the Fox News report that said that there never was a memo? C'mon Rhino, don't embarrass your self anymore... get in front of a Television and read...err, I mean watch! Must be talking about a different memo... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 1 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
rhino 0 #19 October 19, 2004 QuoteI read most of the report. Keep reading... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #20 October 19, 2004 QuoteMichael Badnarik. I don't think he is even on the ballot in Michigan? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #21 October 19, 2004 QuoteOBL is still missing. Dead or Alive and missing still makes him a threat to this country. Before we went into Iraq there was 1 OBL... Now we have to deal with hundreds..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites freeflydrew 0 #22 October 19, 2004 QuoteQuoteLook broh', here's what other terrorist groups are thinking... you ready? If you mess with Bush, he'll bomb another country... or he'll go after the oil... or he'll do something that doesn't have anything to do with the real culprit... And you know why they think that? Because Bush focused on Iraq when there was never a connection with 9/11... A fact that will never change. Please provide us with proof you know what you are talking about when you make statements like this. The only reason the WTC didn't fall during Clinton's Presidency is the terrorist f*ck'd up and didn't use enough explosives. That's it. That's the only reason. The fact the the 9/11 commission and the Iraq survey group both found no link between 9/11 and Iraq/Saddam, and we invaded Iraq in response to 9/11 and their "imminent threat" is very logical proof that Bush's response to 9/11 was one that had nothing to do with 9/11. And yes, the WTC would have sustained more damage had more explosives been used, (obviously), and it would have sustained less damage if less explosives had been used... but what does that have to do with anything related to Bush? Nada mucho, amigo... Bush ignored the memo that warned that OBL was preparing to attack the country. In response to 9/11, Bush attacked a country with no link to the WTC. Everyday more soldiers are dying, and the civilian death toll in Iraq has passed 14,000!!! Hello? This election isn't between Bush and Clinton, so stop bringing him up... he hasn't been in office for almost 4 years, and it's time that Bush's reelection be based on his success, or lack there of, and the many mistakes and missed opportunities he's had as a president, and unfortunately, Iraq is quickly moving to the top of that list. To think that Bush's moves since 9/11 is protecting the US because the "enemy" is afraid of being bombed is simply naive and very simple minded... I mean, these guys are doing suicide missions... do you really think they're afraid of being bombed? I don't either... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #23 October 19, 2004 Quotewe need someone that can do what is necessary to be done, True.. But we also need a President that is willing to listen to his experts.. Not the experts that are benefiting in financial ways... After 9/11 Bush asked his experts to find a link between Sadham and 9/11. The CIA, FBI, NSA and others got together and founf nothing. Upon going back to the Pres they were told to FIND SOMETHING. TRY AGAIN. He doesn't listen to his experts, he doesn't factor data and he certainly isn't making educated decisions.. Rhino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #24 October 19, 2004 QuoteRice had the memo and Bush ignored it, eh? Please enlighten us as to which memo you are referring. I hope you're not embarrassing yourself by referring to the infamous PDB... Go to your nearest book store, pick up that big fat 9/11 commission report book and READ IT.. Educate yourself for Christs sake!!! Come on people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rhino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites freeflydrew 0 #25 October 19, 2004 Didn't you see the Fox News report that said that there never was a memo? C'mon Rhino, don't embarrass your self anymore... get in front of a Television and read...err, I mean watch! Must be talking about a different memo... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 1 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
rhino 0 #20 October 19, 2004 QuoteMichael Badnarik. I don't think he is even on the ballot in Michigan? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhino 0 #21 October 19, 2004 QuoteOBL is still missing. Dead or Alive and missing still makes him a threat to this country. Before we went into Iraq there was 1 OBL... Now we have to deal with hundreds..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freeflydrew 0 #22 October 19, 2004 QuoteQuoteLook broh', here's what other terrorist groups are thinking... you ready? If you mess with Bush, he'll bomb another country... or he'll go after the oil... or he'll do something that doesn't have anything to do with the real culprit... And you know why they think that? Because Bush focused on Iraq when there was never a connection with 9/11... A fact that will never change. Please provide us with proof you know what you are talking about when you make statements like this. The only reason the WTC didn't fall during Clinton's Presidency is the terrorist f*ck'd up and didn't use enough explosives. That's it. That's the only reason. The fact the the 9/11 commission and the Iraq survey group both found no link between 9/11 and Iraq/Saddam, and we invaded Iraq in response to 9/11 and their "imminent threat" is very logical proof that Bush's response to 9/11 was one that had nothing to do with 9/11. And yes, the WTC would have sustained more damage had more explosives been used, (obviously), and it would have sustained less damage if less explosives had been used... but what does that have to do with anything related to Bush? Nada mucho, amigo... Bush ignored the memo that warned that OBL was preparing to attack the country. In response to 9/11, Bush attacked a country with no link to the WTC. Everyday more soldiers are dying, and the civilian death toll in Iraq has passed 14,000!!! Hello? This election isn't between Bush and Clinton, so stop bringing him up... he hasn't been in office for almost 4 years, and it's time that Bush's reelection be based on his success, or lack there of, and the many mistakes and missed opportunities he's had as a president, and unfortunately, Iraq is quickly moving to the top of that list. To think that Bush's moves since 9/11 is protecting the US because the "enemy" is afraid of being bombed is simply naive and very simple minded... I mean, these guys are doing suicide missions... do you really think they're afraid of being bombed? I don't either... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhino 0 #23 October 19, 2004 Quotewe need someone that can do what is necessary to be done, True.. But we also need a President that is willing to listen to his experts.. Not the experts that are benefiting in financial ways... After 9/11 Bush asked his experts to find a link between Sadham and 9/11. The CIA, FBI, NSA and others got together and founf nothing. Upon going back to the Pres they were told to FIND SOMETHING. TRY AGAIN. He doesn't listen to his experts, he doesn't factor data and he certainly isn't making educated decisions.. Rhino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhino 0 #24 October 19, 2004 QuoteRice had the memo and Bush ignored it, eh? Please enlighten us as to which memo you are referring. I hope you're not embarrassing yourself by referring to the infamous PDB... Go to your nearest book store, pick up that big fat 9/11 commission report book and READ IT.. Educate yourself for Christs sake!!! Come on people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rhino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freeflydrew 0 #25 October 19, 2004 Didn't you see the Fox News report that said that there never was a memo? C'mon Rhino, don't embarrass your self anymore... get in front of a Television and read...err, I mean watch! Must be talking about a different memo... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
