0
jumper03

More on the walmart debate...

Recommended Posts

Quote

Fortunately for us and for them it's a positive sum game. As the economies of foreign places rise, so does their need for cheap crap, cars, airplanes, computers, services & practically everything else.



That would work better if IP were respected in these developing nations. We still produce movies and software here, but piracy is rampant. Hardware designs are copycatted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Japan and China own a considerable amount of the U.S. foreign debt, giving them a powerful weapon should they ever want to trigger a collapse of the U.S. economy. Whether they would ever want to collapse our economy is questionable,


You are only considering half the equation. The US is more valuable to China than vice-versa. They only make up 20% or so of our trade, we make up a much greater proportion of theirs (their economy is yet much smaller for the same trade). There is no credible threat.

Quote


We support that threat by continuing to buy their products.


We support only ourselves by buying the best-priced goods on the market. To suggest otherwise should be immediately false.

nathaniel
My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


That would work better if IP were respected in these developing nations. We still produce movies and software here, but piracy is rampant. Hardware designs are copycatted.


Ha!

Don't even get me started

:$

nathaniel
My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


There is a bit more to it than that. It is my undertanding that Chinese factories do not pay for electricity because it's provided by the government. I wouldn't be surprised if their government takes quite a few other measures to subsidize their manufacturing sector.



That's an argument against free trade, but not against globalization. And IMO it's mostly spot on. As long as there are substantive regulatory & subsidy differences between countries there could be justification for tariffs. That's what the WTO was intended to work out, in order to facilitate globalization.

The US has its own set of subsidies, agriculture, defense, &c. On the other hand China's the worse off for having much of Europe, the Middle East and Asia upwind. Their pollution lands in China.

In a global economists wet dream India & the like would have to subsidize China for all the ill effects of that pollution. It's not likely to ever happen, at least not in our lifetimes.
My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Japan and China own a considerable amount of the U.S. foreign debt, giving them a powerful weapon should they ever want to trigger a collapse of the U.S. economy. Whether they would ever want to collapse our economy is questionable,


You are only considering half the equation. The US is more valuable to China than vice-versa. They only make up 20% or so of our trade, we make up a much greater proportion of theirs (their economy is yet much smaller for the same trade). There is no credible threat.

Quote


We support that threat by continuing to buy their products.


We support only ourselves by buying the best-priced goods on the market. To suggest otherwise should be immediately false.

nathaniel



I understand what you are saying, but the numbers are very scary. Here are some numbers from the U.S. Treasury website (http://www.ustreas.gov/tic/mfh.txt)

MAJOR FOREIGN HOLDERS OF TREASURY SECURITIES
(in billions of dollars)

HOLDINGS 1/ AT END OF Jan 2005

COUNTRY

Japan - 701.0
Mainland China - 195.2
United Kingdom - 160.7
Caribbean Banking Centers 2/ - 92.6
Korea - 67.7
OPEC - 64.7
Germany - 60.3
Taiwan - 58.9
Switzerland - 49.6
Hong Kong - 52.9
Canada - 43.3

There may not be a credible threat now, i.e., China would be screwing themselves by screwing us, but whose to say that situtation will last forever?

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


There may not be a credible threat now, i.e., China would be screwing themselves by screwing us, but whose to say that situtation will last forever?


Pretty much the laws of physics ;) I mean, if an asteroid were to strike the Earth that would change everything, right?

Propping up a currency, esp a foreign currency, is a fairly difficult thing to do. It will get to the point where it becomes so expensive that it's no longer worthwhile. It's a hot issue right now, because it seems China is approaching that point. Dropping the whole thing on the floor would yield to enormous shocks to the world economy, and worst of all inside China. It would likely destabilize the entire country. edit to add: much more likely they will back off gradually, and the US will experience some devaluation while the yuan soars. US exports will pick up, China exports will dip, and the US gov't will have to relearn fiscal discipline. Decidedly ho-hum.

Rarely in macroeconomics do bold things like that ever happen all at once, and when they do they tend to be diastrous for all parties involved. Now, China has shown no indication of wanting to commit economic suicide since at least the 1970's. :P

nathaniel
My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Andy, did you miss my post about Walmart selling gas cheaper then they were able to purchase it from the refinery?



Nope. There's nothing stopping your family from selling discount cards. That method of discounting has exsited for much longer than Walmart. As a kid in Canada, I remember my parents were part of a "discount program" at the local gas station. They had a card that was just like those 'buy 10 coffes, get one free' cards. The attendant would cut out a square each time they filled up, and after 10 fillups they'd get one free.

Either way, gasoline is a commodity, and by definition the selling of comodoties has always been a dog eat dog world. Gas stations have been doing out of business for a lot longer than Walmart has been around. People used to complain about the oil companies putting independant gas stations out of business.

_Am
__

You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Nearly all businesses try to get tax breaks from municipalities. The other two are common business practices as well.

True.........but not to the extreme that Wal-Mart carries it to.

Quote


It's pretty simple. If a store isn't making any money, why keep it open?


A Wal-Mart not make money?:S:D


Quote

ALL retailers use loss leaders, and they are not questionable practices, they're common.

Yes they are common,BUT when used in a predatory manner to eliminate the competition (please refer to Phreezones comments in this thread for a personal account)that's not

Quote

If the manufacturers here are less efficient than those in China, that's what happens. If someone can get something of similar quality from China, why pay more for something that's made here? It is capitalism at work.


Let's see........they get "free power".......Chinese Factories trash the enviroment,and they dont have to observe the same liability laws that we are burdened with..........yeah that's a real level playing field:S


So you keep buying that Chinese crap at Wal-Mart and I will spend my dollars elsewhere;)

Marc SCR 6046 SCS 3004


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


True.........but not to the extreme that Wal-Mart carries it to.



Hey, whatever they are doing is working. I'm not saying I agree with it, but it works.:S

Quote


A Wal-Mart not make money?:S:D



It happens, especially in stores that just open.

Quote


Yes they are common,BUT when used in a predatory manner to eliminate the competition (please refer to Phreezones comments in this thread for a personal account)that's not



I belive the primary purpose for loss leaders is to get people into the store to buy other stuff while they're there. It's a smart thing to do, and it is necessary to compete with other retailers, as they do it too. Alot of the smaller retailers can't do it because they can't make up the loss as easy. It's not predatory, it is just an unfortunate side effect of the bigger stores trying to increase sales.

Quote


So you keep buying that Chinese crap at Wal-Mart and I will spend my dollars elsewhere;)



It's hard to avoid buying some Chinese stuff, as so many things are made there, but I do avoid Wal-Mart if possible (stores in my area are always way too crowded and it's a pain in the ass to shop there).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Where were your clothes made? Take them off and look. I did.

My capri pants - L.L. Bean - Made in El Salvador
My shirt - Old Navy - Made in Sri Lanka
My bra - OLGA - Made in Honduras
My underwear - no labels - I cut them out.

None of these things came from Wal-mart and NONE of them were made in the US.



Hey look, there'sa naked chick in SC!
illegible usually

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've noticed this as well when I try to buy shirts at Walmart. They're HUGE there! And half their clothes are in the "Big & Tall section.

I usually wear a L or M. Once I bought a golf shirt there, and I had to buy a Small, and it was cut way big around the belly area. I had to fold up all the slack a lot just to tuck it in. (actually, that's the speedracer shirt shown in my avatar. I added a yellow G & white collar)
Speed Racer
--------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep, U.S. manufacturers are moving to China. In my Macro Economics class the other day we watched an episode of Frontline and the topic was Wal Mart. One of the manufacturers interviewed was Rubber Made. They were closing their plant and moving to China because the couldn't afford to do business in the U.S. The major reason was that Wal Mart refused to pay the prices they required to stay in business. The good news is a new Wal Mart is opening down the street and will employ most of the laid off factory workers - but at half their previous salary. They are also NOT the low price leader. The low price gimmick was devised by Sam Walton many moons ago when he had his first five and dime. The idea is to put stuff out front and price it at a loss to attract the customer, then price the rest of the merchandise at prices that are often higher than the competition - according to a former Wal Mart VP. Excellent marketing ploy, but a bit deceiving. Wal Mart is a blight; society will eventually figure it out - I hope.
Keith

Don't Fuck with me Keith - J. Mandeville

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Once I bought a golf shirt there, and I had to buy a Small, and it was cut way big around the belly area. I had to fold up all the slack a lot just to tuck it in.



That's more of a 'Fat America' thread bit than a WalMart thing. But it's true - it's getting near impossible to get trim cut clothes any more (wider at the shoulder than the waist). While straight down cut and "pear shape" is plentiful.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've removed the endless string of Ron v. Narcimund posts from this thread.

Can we try to keep this thread on topic, guys? If you want to discuss gay marriage, you can start a new thread for that.

If you want to talk about other poster's personal beliefs or choices, I'd recommend taking it to PM or email.
-- Tom Aiello

Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0