mnealtx 0 #51 May 15, 2005 QuotePerhaps you should re-read the line. I did...several times... Quoteprovide an ...alternative interpretation of my words Please let me know what *OTHER* interpretation someone could take away from that? I guess I must be one of those inbred conservative that can't understand liberal humor, or something...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydyvr 0 #52 May 15, 2005 QuoteLet's see if I got this right. You read something you didn't like (an comment unappreciative of the old guard conservatives and their repetitive cries), get miffed and provide an ...alternative interpretation of my words in hopes of moderator wrath. What's the alternative interpretation? So far, only people who use English as a second language have had difficulty understanding the obvious derogatory intent of your comment. . . =(_8^(1) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #53 May 16, 2005 QuoteEnough of the cross-bickering over whether an opinion should have been inserted Maybe you should spend some time wondering about the motive of an avowed Muslim who posts anti-American, anti-military threads, and then refuses to answer questions about his "personal opinions". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #54 May 16, 2005 QuoteDo you expect anyone that marries outside their own family to take you seriously? I believe that constitutes a personal insult, which is forbidden by forum rules. A moderator should be coming to visit you soon. Re: "Do you expect anyone that marries outside their own family to take you seriously?" As for your back-peddling to try and disclaim this as a personal insult... It is clear that you intended this to mean that only people of below-average intelligence could consider my arguments to be worthy of merit. That is clearly a personal insult. Your best bet would be to just apologize for your comment. Have a nice day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darius11 12 #55 May 16, 2005 QuoteQuoteEnough of the cross-bickering over whether an opinion should have been inserted Maybe you should spend some time wondering about the motive of an avowed Muslim who posts anti-American, anti-military threads, and then refuses to answer questions about his "personal opinions". Anti-American- Oh wait I forgot any one who disagrees with you is an anti-American. Oh wait or is it any one who does not like war is an anti-American. Or maybe any one who has a brain is an anti-American. I don’t know take your pick Anti-military no anti unjust war yes. As usual you have no clue or any facts. You are too blind to see facts John. Unfortunately you think you know it all just like you assume to know me. Some people like you have a filter on their senses they only see what they want to see. I truly feel sorry for you. I hope someday you will wake up and be able to see and admit truth with out prejudice.I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EBSB52 0 #56 May 16, 2005 QuoteQuoteEnough of the cross-bickering over whether an opinion should have been inserted Maybe you should spend some time wondering about the motive of an avowed Muslim who posts anti-American, anti-military threads, and then refuses to answer questions about his "personal opinions". I understand that I will never be able to pry you from your coninual attacking of people versus attacking the arguments, merits, etc. Can you address why it's important for you to assess what a person is about over the merit of their arguments? If I'm getting advice from someone I will weigh their opinions, perspectives, ect., but when arguing issues the person making the assertion is almost always not of importance. I know you don't understand. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EBSB52 0 #57 May 16, 2005 QuoteQuoteQuotePerhaps he should have started with the explaining_all_introduction: "In the news" like others do many times? I do use that often, because that introduces my subject, and explains where it comes from, so that no one thinks that it is my own writing. Then, after the introduction, I also go on to support or defend my subject matter. When I start a thread, I stick around to defend my position. So, your comment doesn't really say anything, as usual. Even if he had started with "In the news", it wouldn't have done anything towards contributing his own personal opinion. What in the world would make you think that I would EVER want to follow your lead in any thing? You do it your way I’ll do mine. I know we don’t agree about any thing that has to do with politics but do you really think every one should follow YOURWAY when starting a thread too. That’s says a lot about how open your mind is. No wonder I have such a hard time reasoning with some people on here. It’s a fucking thread dude. About news that I thought should be mentioned. Last time I checked your name was not in green thank god and HH for that. Oh one more thing the article is from MSN i did post a link. Seriously. The protocol of Americans, esp conservative Americans is to attack the messenger instead of the issue. I expect some of that in politics, but not in 'real life.' Important decisions are made based on that SOB is a ________, and we all know people that think like that or do that are always wrong. Sorry dude, this country is a toilet largely due to its reasoning inabilities. For example, my argument that Bush is a rotten president is based upon the Ergonomics Bill, Overtime Law, Bankruptcy Law, Iraq War, and many more things of the sort. The fact that he is a rich, spoiled, draft dodging turd makes me think he's a waste of skin, but if the latter atributes were present and the former were not, I wouldn't base my opinion of his presidency on his personla flaws, which I currently do not. I voted for Perot in 92 and he is a typical rich guy, but I felt his policies would have been beneficial to the US. So I agree with you, you posted an article to be bantered about, it offended some people that couldn't defend it based upon merit so they attacked the messenger. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darius11 12 #58 May 16, 2005 I posted the article because I thought it was worthy news. There are a few people on here that seem to always respond to any of my posts with the same words and attitude. No matter what the facts are they are not willing to see it or simply call it false. I have no problem with people I don’t agree with we all have our own opinions. I have a problem with people who are simply unable to admit fault. I have always thought it takes a bigger person to admit a mistake or admit when they are wrong. Some are simply incapable.I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
