CLWDDNCR 0 #1 September 23, 2016 Anyone out there have experience or an opinion on a Firebolt 180 loaded 1:1 ? Thanks in advance, Clouddancer [thehardhat@earthlink.net] Really tired of butt skid landings instead of descent flairs only into 10 knots or better wind for my Triathlon I've just become too heavy for good no wind flares.Clouddancer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hackish 8 #2 September 23, 2016 I would suggest you have the trim checked. We have a firebolt 189 at the DZ and I load it around 1.1. It's been a few seasons since I test jumped it but I found the flair to be quite acceptable, far better than my triathalon. -Michael Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
faulknerwn 38 #3 September 24, 2016 From my jumps on them Firebolts open super soft and have a great flare Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jumpwally 0 #4 September 26, 2016 Is it a quick opener ? or a sniveler ? thx muchsmile, be nice, enjoy life FB # - 1083 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
faulknerwn 38 #5 September 28, 2016 Definitely a sniveler. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SecondRound 1 #6 September 29, 2016 Yes a very deliberate sniveler Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunterbeav 0 #7 December 11, 2017 Is there an issue with the slider hanging up on the Firebolt canopies Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
benlangfeld 1 #8 December 11, 2017 I’m a total novice and apparently shouldn’t be flying one, but I’ve done 7 jumps on a Firebolt 210 loaded at 0.85 and my observation in comparison with two larger student canopies is that the snivel is very long (I thought I had a malfunction on the first of those jumps) and the slider tends to get stuck for a moment about a foot above the risers, sometimes requiring a pull on rears to get it down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunterbeav 0 #9 December 11, 2017 benlangfeldI’m a total novice and apparently shouldn’t be flying one, but I’ve done 7 jumps on a Firebolt 210 loaded at 0.85 and my observation in comparison with two larger student canopies is that the snivel is very long (I thought I had a malfunction on the first of those jumps) and the slider tends to get stuck for a moment about a foot above the risers, sometimes requiring a pull on rears to get it down. Hi Ben....sounds like you're doing things right....wing loading at 0.85 sounds ok...did you buy this canopy or are you renting. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
benlangfeld 1 #10 December 11, 2017 Renting. I only discovered it was a firebolt after those 7 jumps. Scared me when I found out it’s definitely not a beginners canopy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunterbeav 0 #11 December 11, 2017 benlangfeldRenting. I only discovered it was a firebolt after those 7 jumps. Scared me when I found out it’s definitely not a beginners canopy. Here's what I found on the Firebolt and wing loading: The FireBolt can't be compared directly to any other canopy. When lightly loaded (.5 or .6 pounds per sq. ft.), it can be a beginner canopy. When heavily loaded (2.3 pounds per sq. ft. to 1.7 pounds per sq. ft.) it is a high performance canopy, that will please the most aggressive canopy pilot. canopy. When loaded from .85 pounds per square foot to 1.6 or so, it is a great all-around canopy, capable of slow flight with lots of stability and great toggling range. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
betzilla 56 #12 December 11, 2017 QuoteThe FireBolt is absolutely new technology um, not exactly. It's been out since at least 2003 (that is when the first user review was posted here on DZ.com). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunterbeav 0 #13 December 11, 2017 betzillaQuoteThe FireBolt is absolutely new technology um, not exactly. It's been out since at least 2003 (that is when the first user review was posted here on DZ.com). Sorry... I should have edited that part......fixed Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhreeZone 20 #14 December 11, 2017 The firebolt is pretty dated and is between the Stiletto and Sabre in terms of its performance. The Pilot is close to how the Firebolt flies. Not many really high performance pilots would really be that pleased with how it flies when its compared to any of the current designs out there even when you look at the non-crossbraced models. At a light loading it would be fine but if you load it up there are much better flying canopies out there.Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shadeland 5 #15 December 11, 2017 betzillaQuoteThe FireBolt is absolutely new technology um, not exactly. It's been out since at least 2003 (that is when the first user review was posted here on DZ.com). 2003 was probably the last time they updated their web page. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NancyJ 11 #16 December 13, 2017 Typical openings are 300 – 400 feet to a fully opened canopy. The FireBolt is tuned for soft, comfortable openings. That is why it's a "cameraman's dream". Front riser pressure is relatively easy. The flare is terrific, and what I mean by that is, it’ll “pop you up” if you come in with a lot of speed and apply brakes all at once; or it will give you a sustained surf if you give it a little bit of brake as you enter ground effect. It’s a very effective flare. If you land conservatively (no front riser or hook turn), you’ll still get tremendous lift and consequently a good flare with the FireBolt. The current production FireBolt patterns and line trims has been refined since it was first introduced and since we started using Ultrasil 0-Porosity canopy fabric, FireBolts are wearing much better. The best thing to do is demo one to see how the NEW FireBolt performs. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunterbeav 0 #17 December 13, 2017 NancyJTypical openings are 300 – 400 feet to a fully opened canopy. The FireBolt is tuned for soft, comfortable openings. That is why it's a "cameraman's dream". Front riser pressure is relatively easy. The flare is terrific, and what I mean by that is, it’ll “pop you up” if you come in with a lot of speed and apply brakes all at once; or it will give you a sustained surf if you give it a little bit of brake as you enter ground effect. It’s a very effective flare. If you land conservatively (no front riser or hook turn), you’ll still get tremendous lift and consequently a good flare with the FireBolt. The current production FireBolt patterns and line trims has been refined since it was first introduced and since we started using Ultrasil 0-Porosity canopy fabric, FireBolts are wearing much better. The best thing to do is demo one to see how the NEW FireBolt performs. Thanks for the update Nancy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites