mr2mk1g 10 #176 November 9, 2005 Wow - you mean Bush could be excommunicated as a heretic? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rasmack 0 #177 November 9, 2005 QuoteWow - you mean Bush could be excommunicated as a heretic? Well, at least I don't think they burn them any more, although I may be wrong here... HF #682, Team Dirty Sanchez #227 “I simply hate, detest, loathe, despise, and abhor redundancy.” - Not quite Oscar Wilde... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,107 #178 November 9, 2005 Maybe you're just playing with us, but it seems from your posts that you do not really know what science is or what the scientific method involves. I recommend that you find out before you embarrass yourself.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GTAVercetti 0 #179 November 9, 2005 QuoteMaybe you're just playing with us, but it seems from your posts that you do not really know what science is or what the scientific method involves. I recommend that you find out before you embarrass yourself. quiet you, it is much more fun this way.Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IanHarrop 42 #180 November 9, 2005 QuoteQuoteWow - you mean Bush could be excommunicated as a heretic? Well, at least I don't think they burn them any more, although I may be wrong here... I wonder if it would be televised, perhaps one of those HBO things that you have to pay extra to watch... Yep... I'd pay money to watch Bush burn. Might have to finally go for HDTV to get a real good look. "Where troubles melt like lemon drops, away above the chimney tops, that's where you'll find me" Dorothy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr2mk1g 10 #181 November 9, 2005 Quotewatch Bush burn Don't mention burning bushes - he already thinks God talks to him direct he doesn't need any more 'signs'. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vpozzoli 0 #182 November 9, 2005 QuoteGWB is living proof that intelligent design is a fraud. Or at the very least that the Designer is not as Intelligent as he wants us to believe. Vale Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rasmack 0 #183 November 9, 2005 QuoteQuoteGWB is living proof that intelligent design is a fraud. Or at the very least that the Designer is not as Intelligent as he wants us to believe. Vale Is that "he" or "He"? HF #682, Team Dirty Sanchez #227 “I simply hate, detest, loathe, despise, and abhor redundancy.” - Not quite Oscar Wilde... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlexCrowley 0 #184 November 9, 2005 Who knows? the discussion keeps evolving. TV's got them images, TV's got them all, nothing's shocking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diverborg 0 #185 November 9, 2005 Hmmm, I think I'm gonna go dig up an old thread and revive it. Sounds kinda fun. Any suggestions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rasmack 0 #186 November 9, 2005 QuoteHmmm, I think I'm gonna go dig up an old thread and revive it. Sounds kinda fun. Any suggestions? What was the very first thread in SC?HF #682, Team Dirty Sanchez #227 “I simply hate, detest, loathe, despise, and abhor redundancy.” - Not quite Oscar Wilde... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Enrique 0 #187 November 9, 2005 QuoteGenerally, valid scientific theories are modified rather than proved wrong. I agree and stand corrected. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rasmack 0 #188 November 9, 2005 QuoteQuoteGenerally, valid scientific theories are modified rather than proved wrong. I agree and stand corrected. Actually one might be tempted to say that we are quite sure that most (if not all) scientific theories are "wrong" in the sense of "not true". That however does not diminish the descriptive power of some models. Evolution, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics... These are all models which we know to describe parts of Nature. Are they "true"? That question can per definition never be answered. Edit: Speling is hart...HF #682, Team Dirty Sanchez #227 “I simply hate, detest, loathe, despise, and abhor redundancy.” - Not quite Oscar Wilde... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skysaintj 0 #189 November 10, 2005 QuoteMaybe you're just playing with us, but it seems from your posts that you do not really know what science is or what the scientific method involves. I recommend that you find out before you embarrass yourself. I'm not a scientist or anything close but have read up on both theories .Science has proven itself more wrong than right concerning this evolution theory on the flipside All the Bible prophecies happened exactly as it was written and some is busy being fullfilled right now - we can go into detail on all this and that and use this theory to contradict that theory etc...it's just not worth it...been there done that I believe in microevolution that is fact and evidence is there for all to see but not macro evolution - what a bunch of bullshit ! atheists/evolutionists can still not answer the fundamental question concerning the basis of their theory and never will : Go read up about "abiogenisis" (we evolved from a rock) - this is modern science proving the whole evolution theory false ...oops and splat goes the crap :) - Most Evolutionists/atheists will argue their theory cause they hope they find conclusive proof to give comfort to their inner paranoia ..science will prove your pathetic theory more wrong as time goes on.....Darwin , Bhwahahahaahahahhahahaha !!!!!!!!!he fed the world some bad acid see link : http://www.cryingvoice.com/Evolution/Darwin_Owen.html - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr2mk1g 10 #190 November 10, 2005 I just pooed myself laughing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rasmack 0 #191 November 10, 2005 I now see how completely we have failed in our way of debating this subject. [URL "http://abstractfactory.blogspot.com/2005/10/only-debate-on-intelligent-design-that.html"]This[/url] is how it should be done HF #682, Team Dirty Sanchez #227 “I simply hate, detest, loathe, despise, and abhor redundancy.” - Not quite Oscar Wilde... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vpozzoli 0 #192 November 10, 2005 QuoteQuoteQuoteGWB is living proof that intelligent design is a fraud. Or at the very least that the Designer is not as Intelligent as he wants us to believe. Vale Is that "he" or "He"? Actually if you want to be PC at all costs, it should be an "it". I just can't help being a male chauvinist, the devil made me do it! Vale Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GTAVercetti 0 #193 November 10, 2005 QuoteI now see how completely we have failed in our way of debating this subject. [URL "http://abstractfactory.blogspot.com/2005/10/only-debate-on-intelligent-design-that.html"]This[/url] is how it should be done Dude. That is. fucking. awesome.Why yes, my license number is a palindrome. Thank you for noticing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,077 #194 November 10, 2005 >I believe in microevolution that is fact . . . . Careful there! You've just alienated all the people who KNOW that all evolution is a load of crap. Heck, you'd probably get bounced off the old Kansas school board for that radical belief! After all, no one can PROVE to a man in the street that bacteria exist, and that it's not just God getting mad at you. > Most Evolutionists/atheists will argue their theory . . . And what will people who believe in God and religion argue? Or would the existence of such a person cause a meltdown? >we can go into detail . . . We tried that. You got yourself all confused. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zenister 0 #195 November 10, 2005 QuoteI'm not a scientist or anything close but have read up on both theories read more.. and take off the crucifix shaped blinders.. they are greatly intefering with your grasp of some basic scientific priniciples, as well as your perception of some simple facts... Quote on the flipside All the Bible prophecies happened exactly as it was written and some is busy being fullfilled right now rotflmao... so what exactly have they been slipping into your communion wine?? One could just as verifiability claim the entire Edda Saga happened exactly as written.. the FACTS are none of your 'prophecies' stand up to historical critical review.. but of course Xtains never let facts interfere with their belief...____________________________________ Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
