Recommended Posts
highfly 0
Jeesh
You dont need much incouragement do you
www.myspace.com/durtymac
You dont need much incouragement do you
www.myspace.com/durtymac
DrewGPM 0
It is a mineral supplement delivery system, not a weapon. They weren't trying burn anything or blow anything up they were trying to help the people of Iraq build strong bones and teeth. It wasn't the US military it was the Salvation Army that did it. I'm sure we'll find that this device was funded by a grant from the Health and Human Services department. Damn good samaritans!
billvon 3,071
.thumb.jpg.4bb795e2eaf21b8b300039a5e1ec7f92.jpg)
>It was mineral supplement delivery system, not a weapon.
See? So much confusion over this issue, cleared up by one simple post. I mean, who can argue with getting kids the vitamins and minerals they need for healthy skin and strong bones?
See? So much confusion over this issue, cleared up by one simple post. I mean, who can argue with getting kids the vitamins and minerals they need for healthy skin and strong bones?
And this is why I feel so at home with skydivers. We'll make fun of anything.
DrewGPM 0
next thing we'll find out is that all these reports of torture are actually the Army dentists helping the prisoners learn how to use detal floss....which was banned under previous regime.
DrewGPM 0
except tsunami warnings. I got in trouble for making a joke about the tsunami warning yesterday.
Quoteexcept tsunami warnings. I got in trouble for making a joke about the tsunami warning yesterday.
He's a clown with evil eyes and sharp teeth. I wouldn't take him too seriously.
highfly 0
QuoteIt is a mineral supplement delivery system, not a weapon. They weren't trying burn anything or blow anything up they were trying to help the people of Iraq build strong bones and teeth. It wasn't the US military it was the Salvation Army that did it. I'm sure we'll find that this device was funded by a grant from the Health and Human Services department. Damn good samaritans!
LMFAO.
As Sudsy said.. We can all see the funnier side of things.
www.myspace.com/durtymac
As I see it, the issue at hand is not whether it is legal or illegal to use WP, but whether using a weapon such is this is right or wrong from a human standpoint.
Face it...dying by fire is one of the worst and most painful ways to go. Using a weapon which causes extreme pain and suffering before death ensues, puts you on dodgy moral ground.
Sure it is effective, whole gangs of scientists have no doubt burned the midnite oil designing the best delivery systems and the pentagon probably has loads of information about tests, potential side effects, strategic uses ect, ect ad nauseum.
But the question remains, is it right to kill anyone in that way?
This is not in defense of the terrorists, their use of bombs against civilians is morally reprehensible, but so is the use of a weapon which causes extreme pain and suffering before death results.
I personally would never like to die from burning to death from a fire which cannot be extinguised, napalm, WP or whatever.
Dont tell me that terrorists are not already using footage and photos of the victims of WP to further brainwash and indoctrinate the fools they have managed to recruit....see the evil of the West.
I can empathise with the Allied commander though, whose objective is to win the battle with as little loss of life on his own side as possible, but when the means to victory bring you to the level of a torturer from the Spanish inquisition, then it becomes time to examine what it is we are fighting to preserve.
Our Humanity?......we may be losing it faster than we think.
Face it...dying by fire is one of the worst and most painful ways to go. Using a weapon which causes extreme pain and suffering before death ensues, puts you on dodgy moral ground.
Sure it is effective, whole gangs of scientists have no doubt burned the midnite oil designing the best delivery systems and the pentagon probably has loads of information about tests, potential side effects, strategic uses ect, ect ad nauseum.
But the question remains, is it right to kill anyone in that way?
This is not in defense of the terrorists, their use of bombs against civilians is morally reprehensible, but so is the use of a weapon which causes extreme pain and suffering before death results.
I personally would never like to die from burning to death from a fire which cannot be extinguised, napalm, WP or whatever.
Dont tell me that terrorists are not already using footage and photos of the victims of WP to further brainwash and indoctrinate the fools they have managed to recruit....see the evil of the West.
I can empathise with the Allied commander though, whose objective is to win the battle with as little loss of life on his own side as possible, but when the means to victory bring you to the level of a torturer from the Spanish inquisition, then it becomes time to examine what it is we are fighting to preserve.
Our Humanity?......we may be losing it faster than we think.
*Disclaimer*
The views expressed in the above post may or may not be the result of drunkeness or temporary insanity and should only rarely be construed as the views of the poster himself
The views expressed in the above post may or may not be the result of drunkeness or temporary insanity and should only rarely be construed as the views of the poster himself
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites