0
tkhayes

Bush takes blame for faulty Iraqi intelligence

Recommended Posts

http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/14/bush_iraq051214.html

so can we please go back in time to all those threads that claimed that we were actually RIGHT to go into Iraq? and maybe re-do them all again, with the correct information......

And now after being wrong, we still feel justified to stay there and 'finish' the job.

I expect this will do more to promote terrorism against the USA that we ever hoped to get rid of by invading.

Of course, I doubt Bush and/or the military actually see anythign wrong with that. Nothing like driving the war machine, the military, oil, all good stuff for him and the cronies.

To hell with education, health care, the economy, the deficit......who needs it anyway......

TK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe you just bypassed the "Bush said he accepted responsibility for sending the military into Iraq based on intelligence that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction." portion of the news in your eagerness to "clintonize" him.
B|
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"so can we please go back in time to all those threads that claimed that we were actually RIGHT to go into Iraq? "

Maybe next time Dubbya will log on to Dropzone.com and actually listen to us.....;)
--------------------

He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. Thomas Jefferson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Maybe you just bypassed the "Bush said he accepted responsibility for sending the military into Iraq based on intelligence that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction." portion of the news in your eagerness to "clintonize" him.



I know some people have some issues with English as a second language, BUT, when I listened ( yes I listened to his speech)to him, the nuance was quite clear.
Let me say it the way he means.
I take responsibility for sending in our troops, BUT it was because those lying fucks in our intelligence community wanted me to invade because they only provided me with what I wanted to hear.

DUDE.. His boys in the Iraqui working group, the same ones who drafted the New American Century plan, needed to cook the intel to make their case as an excuse to follow what they had TOLD us they were going to do back in the late 90's.
So lets see.. a bunch of lies by all levels of this administration led to how many American deaths???

How many Iraqui deaths?? ( oh yeah.. they are just collateral damage so who gives a shit)

Clintons lie about not having sex with that woman led to how many American deaths...
I just LOVE it when you guys CONTINUALLY bring up a blow job being FAR more earth shattering than going to war.

By the way... I dont think Clinton lied about his statement of " I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
I know a HELL of a lot of Good Ole Boys from the South who do not rate oral sex as having "Sexual Relations" They go by the Biblical meaning.. of good ole missionary sex and that is IT. Anything else just aint sex.


I know its hard for you guys on the right to get laid ... and you really do hate the guy for getting some action... tsk tsk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

And now after being wrong, we still feel justified obligated to stay there and 'finish' the job... of cleaning up the mess we made by getting Iraqi troops up & functional so they can take over.



REgardless of how we feel about the invasion 2 years ago, WTF else can we do at this point? Just wimp out & give up, drop everything in the middle of the road and walk away? ?
Speed Racer
--------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

And now after being wrong, we still feel justified obligated to stay there and 'finish' the job... of cleaning up the mess we made by getting Iraqi troops up & functional so they can take over.



REgardless of how we feel about the invasion 2 years ago, WTF else can we do at this point? Just wimp out & give up, drop everything in the middle of the road and walk away? ?



No - we also have to declare victory and give out medals to the generals.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
re: Weapons of Mass Destruction

Ironically, it turns out that the Only WMDs
were the missles, rockets, shells and other assorted 'ordnance' which came from USA aircraft, Naval vessels, and ground forces ...and hit with "pinpoint precision" .

Ask anyone on the ground and in structures which were blown to smithereens, people who watched buildings crumble and loved ones die,,,, whether the destruction was on a "mass" level??? or not.....[:/]
...( there's no question they are weapons )
"What's good for General BullMoose is good for the USA" Al Capp....lil' Abner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0