tkhayes 348 #1 December 20, 2005 http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/20/intelligentdesign-051220.html I have renewed faith in the judicial system..... TK Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #2 December 20, 2005 Quotehttp://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/20/intelligentdesign-051220.html I have renewed faith in the judicial system..... TK All I need now is a slot on the Z-Hills big ways for it to be a great Solstice.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlexCrowley 0 #3 December 20, 2005 as far as the conclusion "It would be a secular version of creationism" well fucking duh! TV's got them images, TV's got them all, nothing's shocking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #4 December 20, 2005 The Religion of Evolution...the theory continues. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlexCrowley 0 #5 December 20, 2005 TV's got them images, TV's got them all, nothing's shocking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
micro 0 #6 December 20, 2005 QuoteThe fight by the religious right to include intelligent design theory in the biology curriculum has been the biggest courtroom clash on evolution since the 1925 Scopes monkey trial. Many noteable scientists who are NOT part of the "religious right" want this taught in biological curricula. QuoteThe policy required that students be told Darwin's theory is "not a fact," and has inexplicable "gaps." true statement QuoteMany members of the scientific community hold that intelligent design is invalid as a theory because it cannot be tested and offers no hypotheses. And there are parts of darwin's theories that are also not testable. Many members of the scientific community hold ID as more plausible than strict darwinism. QuoteMany respected scientists have gone so far as to call it pseudoscience or junk science. And many other respected scientists have said the same thing about darwinism. These last statements in this article are fallacious. I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlexCrowley 0 #7 December 20, 2005 ummm. no. TV's got them images, TV's got them all, nothing's shocking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RhondaLea 4 #8 December 20, 2005 But...but...what about the Flying Spaghetti Monster? I'm devastated. rlIf you don't know where you're going, you should know where you came from. Gullah Proverb Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlexCrowley 0 #9 December 20, 2005 I'm more upset that I wont be able to hear the pro-intelligent design people tell me that FSM is a straw man argument. TV's got them images, TV's got them all, nothing's shocking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #10 December 20, 2005 QuoteI'm more upset that I wont be able to hear the pro-intelligent design people tell me that FSM is a straw man argument. The Straw Man! Now there's a God worth worshipping. I've seen so much of TSM around here that I know he must be real.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyD 0 #11 December 20, 2005 QuoteMany members of the scientific community hold ID as more plausible than strict darwinism. This baffles me. How could you be considered a "member of the scientific community" if the best you can come up with is: Fuck, I don't know. This is too complicated for me to understand, so I give up. God must have done it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlexCrowley 0 #12 December 20, 2005 I thnk thats one of the funniest things I've read today. TV's got them images, TV's got them all, nothing's shocking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #13 December 20, 2005 QuoteQuoteMany members of the scientific community hold ID as more plausible than strict darwinism. This baffles me. How could you be considered a "member of the scientific community" if the best you can come up with is: Fuck, I don't know. This is too complicated for me to understand, so I give up. God must have done it. Umm, just as there are bad lawyers and bad architects, so there are also some incompetent scientists out there. The universal consensus among the competent is that ID is NOT science.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlexCrowley 0 #14 December 20, 2005 You're pretty good with google. Check out 'humor' next time you're there TV's got them images, TV's got them all, nothing's shocking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #15 December 20, 2005 Quotehttp://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/20/intelligentdesign-051220.html I have renewed faith in the judicial system..... TK Will be an interesting test for Roberts (and possibly Alito) when it get to the Supreme Court. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlexCrowley 0 #16 December 20, 2005 trolls are made of rocks. Silicate lifeforms. TV's got them images, TV's got them all, nothing's shocking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #17 December 20, 2005 QuoteYou're pretty good with google. Check out 'humor' next time you're there Sometimes one just has to spell it out, you know. Some of our readers still believe in invisible friends.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
micro 0 #18 December 20, 2005 The universal consensus among the competent is that ID is NOT science. and neither is much of darwinist theory. I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
micro 0 #19 December 20, 2005 QuoteQuoteYou're pretty good with google. Check out 'humor' next time you're there Sometimes one just has to spell it out, you know. Some of our readers still believe in invisible friends. and some of our readers will soon meet them. I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
okalb 104 #20 December 20, 2005 QuoteQuotehttp://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/20/intelligentdesign-051220.html I have renewed faith in the judicial system..... TK All I need now is a slot on the Z-Hills big ways for it to be a great Solstice. Did you email boxman?Time flies like an arrow....fruit flies like a banana Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #21 December 20, 2005 QuoteQuoteMany members of the scientific community hold ID as more plausible than strict darwinism. This baffles me. How could you be considered a "member of the scientific community" if the best you can come up with is: Fuck, I don't know. This is too complicated for me to understand, so I give up. God must have done it. Wow - this is the tersest, yet most complete ridicule of ID I've ever seen. To the best of our knowledge, there aren't other rocky planets out there capable of complex life. We're hindered by resolution and by the fact that distance equals time, but all we've seen are gaseous planets. But even without seeing the planet on the visual spectrum, we should have gotten some radio waves by now. While Earth took 5B years to start sending waves out, what are the odds no other planet evolved to that point 10,000 years ago? If Earth was created by a God, what are the odds that there's only one of them, located right here, while the rest of the galaxy is godless? Seems pretty far fetched to me. Or this god is one lazy son of a bitch. Gave a half assed effort on Mars and then retired. As for the odds of Earth happening naturally, so what if they're small. If it didn't happen, we wouldn't be here to have this discussion. (duh) What are the odds of last week's powerball being last week's numbers? 1. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #22 December 20, 2005 Quote But...but...what about the Flying Spaghetti Monster? I'm devastated. rl Dont worry. All the infidels will soon be touched by His Noodley Appendage.Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #23 December 20, 2005 QuoteQuoteQuotehttp://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/12/20/intelligentdesign-051220.html I have renewed faith in the judicial system..... TK All I need now is a slot on the Z-Hills big ways for it to be a great Solstice. Did you email boxman? Yes. Full.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
markd_nscr986 0 #24 December 20, 2005 QuoteDont worry. All the infidels will soon be touched by His Noodley Appendage. Let the Schwein touch this infidel with it and I'll bite it offMarc SCR 6046 SCS 3004 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,027 #25 December 20, 2005 QuoteThe universal consensus among the competent is that ID is NOT science. and neither is much of darwinist theory. Are you meaning strict "Origin of Species" exactly as written 150 years ago, or modern evolutionary theory based on Darwin's great and inspired work and modified by our knowledge of molecular biology? It is a transparent and failing strategy that can only confuse the ignorant to call it "Darwinist" or "Darwinism", as if it's dogma like Catholicism or Calvinism.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 1 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
kallend 2,027 #25 December 20, 2005 QuoteThe universal consensus among the competent is that ID is NOT science. and neither is much of darwinist theory. Are you meaning strict "Origin of Species" exactly as written 150 years ago, or modern evolutionary theory based on Darwin's great and inspired work and modified by our knowledge of molecular biology? It is a transparent and failing strategy that can only confuse the ignorant to call it "Darwinist" or "Darwinism", as if it's dogma like Catholicism or Calvinism.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
