peacefuljeffrey 0 #1 January 10, 2006 Bomb found in San Fran Starbucks can... Um, got a bomb problem, San Francisco? Just pass a law that bans bomb ownership! If you think it's gonna work for guns... -Jeffrey-Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lummy 4 #2 January 10, 2006 well that explains why the trains were running late tonite. I thought the cop was just looking for someone being a PITAI promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #3 January 10, 2006 QuoteUm, got a bomb problem, San Francisco? Just pass a law that bans bomb ownership! If you think it's gonna work for guns... I guess they're gonna need another referendum. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #4 January 10, 2006 >Um, got a bomb problem, San Francisco? Perhaps a terrorist was responding to Bill O'Reilly's invitation to bomb San Francisco. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
markd_nscr986 0 #5 January 10, 2006 QuotePerhaps a terrorist was responding to Bill O'Reilly's invitation to bomb San Francisco. What took em so long then?Marc SCR 6046 SCS 3004 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,991 #6 January 10, 2006 >What took em so long then? On their first try they packaged the explosives in condoms; they got caught. This time they put it in a metal canister and labeled it "ammonium nitrate/fuel oil" so HLS would know it wasn't an illegal drug. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyDekker 1,465 #7 January 10, 2006 Holey FUCk, I can't believe you have people like that running rampant....can't you FUCKING expect more from your SOCIETY...guess they are all socially inept miscreants wanting to bomb eachother cause they don't get their way..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites JohnRich 4 #8 January 10, 2006 QuotePerhaps a terrorist was responding to Bill O'Reilly's invitation to bomb San Francisco. Well, the certainly know where to strike to hurt them the most. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,991 #9 January 10, 2006 >Well, the certainly know where to strike to hurt them the most. True. Although even if they took out that one, they'd have another 7342 to go to make Seattle Starbucks free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Richards 0 #10 January 11, 2006 I have a solution. Simply create a bomb registry ( like the gun registry here in Canada). Forcing terrorist to register their bombs with the federal government is guaranteed to stop terrorists. Such registries only cost about 2 billion. Richards My biggest handicap is that sometimes the hole in the front of my head operates a tad bit faster than the grey matter contained within. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites juanesky 0 #11 January 11, 2006 Are you talking about the middle east?"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #12 January 11, 2006 Quote>Um, got a bomb problem, San Francisco? Perhaps a terrorist was responding to Bill O'Reilly's invitation to bomb San Francisco. The press doesn't encourage AQ, remember? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites peacefuljeffrey 0 #13 January 11, 2006 QuoteHoley FUCk, I can't believe you have people like that running rampant....can't you FUCKING expect more from your SOCIETY...guess they are all socially inept miscreants wanting to bomb eachother cause they don't get their way..... We never said we didn't miscreants and other shitty criminals. But we're not gonna take the ridiculous PUSSY way out and APPEASE them at our own expense. -Jeffrey-Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyDekker 1,465 #14 January 11, 2006 Nope, PJ was in a different thread admonishing the brittish for not being able to control their society and louldly wondered why the brittish could not expect more from their society.... Ohh, that was for being drunk and getting into a fight. This one is for trying to blow up a Starbucks...ohh well, I understand, blowing things up is a far lesser crime... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Mikki_ZH 0 #15 January 11, 2006 I would guess it was an Italian who is upset that Starbucks is already expanding with it’s disgusting chain coffee to Italy…Michi (#1068) hsbc/gba/sba www.swissbaseassociation.ch www.michibase.ch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #16 January 11, 2006 QuoteThis one is for trying to blow up a Starbucks...ohh well, I understand, blowing things up is a far lesser crime... well, it is a Starbucks.... Just go to the next Starbucks 30 feet down the street, or the one directly across the road, or the 7 they are putting in the new mall frankly, I can see an upside to it ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites peacefuljeffrey 0 #17 January 11, 2006 QuoteNope, PJ was in a different thread admonishing the brittish for not being able to control their society and louldly wondered why the brittish could not expect more from their society.... Ohh, that was for being drunk and getting into a fight. This one is for trying to blow up a Starbucks...ohh well, I understand, blowing things up is a far lesser crime... Once again, I never said we didn't have criminals or criminal behavior. The difference is, do you respond by punishing the criminals, or kissing their asses in the hope that you can mollify them into a state of not wanting to riot in your town and destroy all o' your shit. Britain has opted for the latter course. America expects lawful behavior, and still (sort of, anyway) tries to actually punish criminals. Are you sure that Britain was not invaded and taken over by the French recently? -Jeffrey-Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyDekker 1,465 #18 January 11, 2006 QuoteOnce again, I never said we didn't have criminals or criminal behavior. The difference is, do you respond by punishing the criminals, or kissing their asses in the hope that you can mollify them into a state of not wanting to riot in your town and destroy all o' your shit. really, so how many are in prison for the LA riots? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 2 #19 January 13, 2006 Ooh, look, turns out it wasn't a bomb after all! Not even something intended to look like one. But because it was San Francisco, you just wanted it to be, didn't you? Kinda fucks up the whole thread, doesn't it? http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/01/13/starbucks.no.bomb.ap/index.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites peacefuljeffrey 0 #20 January 13, 2006 QuoteOoh, look, turns out it wasn't a bomb after all! Not even something intended to look like one. But because it was San Francisco, you just wanted it to be, didn't you? Kinda fucks up the whole thread, doesn't it? http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/01/13/starbucks.no.bomb.ap/index.html What kind of stupid-ass accusation is that?! I said it was a bomb because THAT'S WHAT THE FUCKING NEWS STORY SAID! I should have somehow known that they would say "bomb" when they didn't know it was a bomb? There are supposed to be, um, you know, experts who know about this kind of stuff? --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 2 #21 January 13, 2006 Lower your Glock slowly, Jeff. It was a joke, pointing out that a lot of people in the thread were giggling over the fact that it happened in San Francisco. And I suspect there would have been fewer giggles had it happended somewhere else, like Topeka, etc. Un-lock, un-load. Speaking of Starbucks, may I recommend the decaf? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites peacefuljeffrey 0 #22 January 13, 2006 Decaf PEPSI, maybe. I don't drink coffee -- and if I did, I would never be sucker enough to pay the outrageous prices for Starbucks! People gotta be out of their mofuckin' minds, paying $4 and up for a fucking cup of coffee! And then they'll bitch about the price of gasoline. --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites AndyMan 7 #23 January 13, 2006 Oh for gods sake. Are they morons? A flashlight is mistaken for a bomb?!?!?! Aparently this has happened before, too. http://www.dailyutahchronicle.com/news/2003/10/14/News/Flashlight.Bomb.Scare.In.Fort.Douglas.Building-527828.shtml _Am__ You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites JohnRich 4 #24 January 13, 2006 QuoteOh for gods sake. Are they morons? A flashlight is mistaken for a bomb?!?!?! Well it is San Francisco. I'm surprised they didn't mistake it for a dildo. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites peacefuljeffrey 0 #25 January 13, 2006 QuoteQuoteOh for gods sake. Are they morons? A flashlight is mistaken for a bomb?!?!?! Well it is San Francisco. I'm surprised they didn't mistake it for a dildo. They'll probably do DNA tests on it to determine if that perhaps happened before they found it. --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
billvon 2,991 #6 January 10, 2006 >What took em so long then? On their first try they packaged the explosives in condoms; they got caught. This time they put it in a metal canister and labeled it "ammonium nitrate/fuel oil" so HLS would know it wasn't an illegal drug. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #7 January 10, 2006 Holey FUCk, I can't believe you have people like that running rampant....can't you FUCKING expect more from your SOCIETY...guess they are all socially inept miscreants wanting to bomb eachother cause they don't get their way..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #8 January 10, 2006 QuotePerhaps a terrorist was responding to Bill O'Reilly's invitation to bomb San Francisco. Well, the certainly know where to strike to hurt them the most. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #9 January 10, 2006 >Well, the certainly know where to strike to hurt them the most. True. Although even if they took out that one, they'd have another 7342 to go to make Seattle Starbucks free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Richards 0 #10 January 11, 2006 I have a solution. Simply create a bomb registry ( like the gun registry here in Canada). Forcing terrorist to register their bombs with the federal government is guaranteed to stop terrorists. Such registries only cost about 2 billion. Richards My biggest handicap is that sometimes the hole in the front of my head operates a tad bit faster than the grey matter contained within. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
juanesky 0 #11 January 11, 2006 Are you talking about the middle east?"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #12 January 11, 2006 Quote>Um, got a bomb problem, San Francisco? Perhaps a terrorist was responding to Bill O'Reilly's invitation to bomb San Francisco. The press doesn't encourage AQ, remember? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #13 January 11, 2006 QuoteHoley FUCk, I can't believe you have people like that running rampant....can't you FUCKING expect more from your SOCIETY...guess they are all socially inept miscreants wanting to bomb eachother cause they don't get their way..... We never said we didn't miscreants and other shitty criminals. But we're not gonna take the ridiculous PUSSY way out and APPEASE them at our own expense. -Jeffrey-Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #14 January 11, 2006 Nope, PJ was in a different thread admonishing the brittish for not being able to control their society and louldly wondered why the brittish could not expect more from their society.... Ohh, that was for being drunk and getting into a fight. This one is for trying to blow up a Starbucks...ohh well, I understand, blowing things up is a far lesser crime... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mikki_ZH 0 #15 January 11, 2006 I would guess it was an Italian who is upset that Starbucks is already expanding with it’s disgusting chain coffee to Italy…Michi (#1068) hsbc/gba/sba www.swissbaseassociation.ch www.michibase.ch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #16 January 11, 2006 QuoteThis one is for trying to blow up a Starbucks...ohh well, I understand, blowing things up is a far lesser crime... well, it is a Starbucks.... Just go to the next Starbucks 30 feet down the street, or the one directly across the road, or the 7 they are putting in the new mall frankly, I can see an upside to it ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #17 January 11, 2006 QuoteNope, PJ was in a different thread admonishing the brittish for not being able to control their society and louldly wondered why the brittish could not expect more from their society.... Ohh, that was for being drunk and getting into a fight. This one is for trying to blow up a Starbucks...ohh well, I understand, blowing things up is a far lesser crime... Once again, I never said we didn't have criminals or criminal behavior. The difference is, do you respond by punishing the criminals, or kissing their asses in the hope that you can mollify them into a state of not wanting to riot in your town and destroy all o' your shit. Britain has opted for the latter course. America expects lawful behavior, and still (sort of, anyway) tries to actually punish criminals. Are you sure that Britain was not invaded and taken over by the French recently? -Jeffrey-Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #18 January 11, 2006 QuoteOnce again, I never said we didn't have criminals or criminal behavior. The difference is, do you respond by punishing the criminals, or kissing their asses in the hope that you can mollify them into a state of not wanting to riot in your town and destroy all o' your shit. really, so how many are in prison for the LA riots? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #19 January 13, 2006 Ooh, look, turns out it wasn't a bomb after all! Not even something intended to look like one. But because it was San Francisco, you just wanted it to be, didn't you? Kinda fucks up the whole thread, doesn't it? http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/01/13/starbucks.no.bomb.ap/index.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #20 January 13, 2006 QuoteOoh, look, turns out it wasn't a bomb after all! Not even something intended to look like one. But because it was San Francisco, you just wanted it to be, didn't you? Kinda fucks up the whole thread, doesn't it? http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/01/13/starbucks.no.bomb.ap/index.html What kind of stupid-ass accusation is that?! I said it was a bomb because THAT'S WHAT THE FUCKING NEWS STORY SAID! I should have somehow known that they would say "bomb" when they didn't know it was a bomb? There are supposed to be, um, you know, experts who know about this kind of stuff? --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #21 January 13, 2006 Lower your Glock slowly, Jeff. It was a joke, pointing out that a lot of people in the thread were giggling over the fact that it happened in San Francisco. And I suspect there would have been fewer giggles had it happended somewhere else, like Topeka, etc. Un-lock, un-load. Speaking of Starbucks, may I recommend the decaf? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #22 January 13, 2006 Decaf PEPSI, maybe. I don't drink coffee -- and if I did, I would never be sucker enough to pay the outrageous prices for Starbucks! People gotta be out of their mofuckin' minds, paying $4 and up for a fucking cup of coffee! And then they'll bitch about the price of gasoline. --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndyMan 7 #23 January 13, 2006 Oh for gods sake. Are they morons? A flashlight is mistaken for a bomb?!?!?! Aparently this has happened before, too. http://www.dailyutahchronicle.com/news/2003/10/14/News/Flashlight.Bomb.Scare.In.Fort.Douglas.Building-527828.shtml _Am__ You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #24 January 13, 2006 QuoteOh for gods sake. Are they morons? A flashlight is mistaken for a bomb?!?!?! Well it is San Francisco. I'm surprised they didn't mistake it for a dildo. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #25 January 13, 2006 QuoteQuoteOh for gods sake. Are they morons? A flashlight is mistaken for a bomb?!?!?! Well it is San Francisco. I'm surprised they didn't mistake it for a dildo. They'll probably do DNA tests on it to determine if that perhaps happened before they found it. --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
