Recommended Posts
rehmwa 2
QuoteThey are too afraid of the 'slippery slope'.
the slippery slope defense is a big piece of crap
abused by both sides of about every issue
it's just an oversimplification to justify too extreme a position - in whatever direction - in a status quo
brought to you by the 'a lot of change is bad - therefore so is a little change' crowd of the extreme left and right
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
jojo69 0
People do not have to agree with my decisions or the decisions of others who have had to face this choice. They do not have to have an abortion. I recognize their right to their choice. They should recognize my right to mine.
sundevil777 102
wmw999 2,485
And to answer SunDevil777 -- I'm not sure murder is ever the right charge. Criminal something after a point, yes. But murder? Maybe murder comes when the government recognizes personhood: a social security number, deduction on the income tax.
Wendy W.
see what happens when you sit silently waiting for someone else to do what is right?


It's legal for our soldiers to go kill people in other countries because the govornment says it is but we aren't allowed to choose to have an abortion. Doesn't that seem skewed?
edited: Changed murder to kill.


--------------
(Do not, I repeat DO NOT, take my posts seriously.)
QuoteSay a young girl, 14 or so, living in a dysfunctional family, gets pregnant. The parents are already poor, maybe abusive, maybe drug addicts, heck maybe she is too. I think it would be totally fucked up to force that 14 year old BABY to have a baby of her own. She's not even physically ready to have it let alone mentally. That baby would be thrown into a totally fucked up environment and would have little to no chance of having a happy life. I don't know about you guys but I'd say that baby is better off not being born right now. Not only that but there are certain things that are hereditary. Alcoholism, addictions, etc. That child could be born addicted to crack. What kind of a life is that going to be for the child? You think it's better for a baby to be born premature, fighting life in a tube? Even if the baby is healthy they still have the rest of it to deal with. Why would you force someone to have that child?
You could say that they could give that child up for adoption but I guarantee that the majority of those situation will not end in adoption. The young girl finally has something to love and thinks her life will change because of it but she's got no clue what she's in for.
It also depends on what you believe. Some religions believe in reincarnation. That soul could have the chance to be born into a good family. Personally I am not a Christian. I don't believe in heaven and hell. I guess Buddhism is more along the lines of what I believe.
Anyway what I'm trying to say is that it all comes down to religion and what your own heart tells you. The government has no right to tell us what to believe.
Abortion should not be a form of birth control in my opinion but there are cases where I think that it can save someone's life. I believe it is my right to choose, not yours, not theirs. This law is a step backwards and it makes me cringe.
you just described many poor inner city black women's situation, yet they choose to have the child instead of actually thinking...the difference in this line of beliefs is much akin to the fact that they suffer awfully from many ailments which require organ transplants but yet will not be an organ donor


![[:/] [:/]](/uploads/emoticons/dry.png)
I hear these storied from the people who have to deal with these issues everyday and the most common cop out is "it's not part of our faith or religion to donate organs we need to be buried whole"
strange that I didn't realize that it is against the CHRISTIAN FAITH TO DONATE ORGANS!!!
but yet it's ok to receive them
same thing as abortion if you are for the freedom of choice ( which I beliEve is assured by our constitution )
but yet those same people would be against euthanasia and want everything done to sustain life no matter what!!!
HIPPOCRATES SHOULD BE FORCED TO ACCEPT THE SAME FATE AS THEY WISH ON OTHERS!
murder is a courtmartial offense!!!
please consider your thoughts before you spit that shit out!
soldiers do not murder! that is an illegal action that can be punished by death... please educate yourself!!!

--------------
(Do not, I repeat DO NOT, take my posts seriously.)

Thank you!
sundevil777 102
QuoteAnd to answer SunDevil777 -- I'm not sure murder is ever the right charge. Criminal something after a point, yes. But murder? Maybe murder comes when the government recognizes personhood: a social security number, deduction on the income tax.
It is murder if it is killed one second after birth. I think it is murder for quite a while before birth.
Some others might disagree, and think that it should be the choice of the woman at any time before birth. I haven't seen anyone explicitly advocate this position yet.
You have mentioned before that the point of quickening (kicking) seems reasonable to you. I would draw the line slightly before this, but either way is a long time before birth, and a long time before the third trimester.
To Girlfalldown:
QuoteIt's legal for our soldiers to go Kill people in other countries because the govornment says it is but we aren't allowed to choose to have an abortion. Doesn't that seem skewed?
Governments certainly do claim the right to kill during wartime. I don't see how this is a useful comparison. Are you saying that abortion should be compared to declaring war?
When do you think it should be illegal (I'll stop asking when it should be considered murder, as this can be an inflammatory way of asking the question).
That is a position much more reasonable than that taken by many abortion rights groups. They are too afraid of the 'slippery slope'.
Unfortunately, that point will be hard to define, and will need to be constantly updated.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites