Recommended Posts
Loonix 0
QuoteWe're 200+ Billion in the hole plus a few tens of thousand wounded and about 2100 KIA. I must have missed something, fill me in.
You spent alot of money, and alot of people died.. this means what? Alright, I'll fill you in. The war was about weapons of mass destruction. Officially, anyway. The likelyhood of there being any such was about 0 (ref. hans blix, UN inspectors, etc). About terrorism, well.. Iraq was not a source for that. Afghanistan was/is, saudi arabia (your preciouss allies) is, many other countries is, iraq was not high on that list. So the actual reason for the war can be speculated on, but just helping the iraqi people getting rid off their evil dictator..? You seriously believe that?
Quote*** That is a pretty optimistic scenario. Why is there so little control now? Do you think that Iraq will avoid civil war? I don't.
Actually, yes I do. Zarqawi (who's Jordanian), Al-Queda, and their ilk are imported and very finite in numbers. In Afghanistan they had a pretty successful anti-terrorist campaign involving inviting them out of their caves and giving them jobs.
The civil war is about sunni and shia. read http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article347806.ece
QuoteDo you think they should be out there throwing rocks and bombs? A bunch of kids just organized themselves and put this one? I don't think so, but as the saying goes 'If you get them young the possibilities are endless.'
You completely fail to see the point... Try to imagine yourself living in a country less superior than the USA. A superior force invades. Muslim ones, wanting to force many of their values on you. To them, Bush is the biggest terrorist in the world today, so this war would be justified, much like yours. Would you sit back and watch, since your president is such a terrorist? I'm saying you just can't expect people to welcome an invasion! Kids throwing rocks is a minor "offense", and capturing a couple of them and beating them up is not only pointless, but serves against the purpose these troops claim they are there for.
About who organized them, is it so hard to believe they did that themselves? And does it matter?
QuoteIt didn't look resolved to me-it looked like they were chased off. And they won't be getting back home- they'll be picked up by parents at the jail who (hopefully) will give them a few additonals to drive it home.
Chased off .. resolved .. They were not throwing rocks, were they? Sure, go ahead, chase them off.. It was resolved after that at least, since they had plenty of times to start beating them up...
QuoteI'm putting on my Johnny Carson Swami hat.......mmmm......I sense that you are no older than 22. Shall I open the envelope?
and...?
QuoteI'm putting on my Johnny Carson Swami hat.......mmmm......I sense that you are no older than 22. Shall I open the envelope?
and...?
the Answer to the question is obvious only you didn't even know the answer...It's that on this topic that you are completely with knowledge or experience
Loonix 0
QuoteQuoteI'm putting on my Johnny Carson Swami hat.......mmmm......I sense that you are no older than 22. Shall I open the envelope?
and...?
the Answer to the question is obvious only you didn't even know the answer...It's that on this topic that you are completely with knowledge or experience
me being young means that its acceptable to beat up kids for throwing rocks at an invading force... well damn, you just changed my mind.
YOU DESERVE WHATEVER YOU RECEIVE!!!
if it's ok to throw rocks at soldiers try doing it yourself...your family will be forced to sell the Rig you no longer need in the afterlife
Loonix 0
Quoteno, it means if anyone is stupid enough to throw anything at guys in uniform, who are armed with rifles and kill people for a living,
YOU DESERVE WHATEVER YOU RECEIVE!!!
well thank god nobody put you in charge of crowd control.. So tell me again, what purpose this served?
some of them were brits as well but those were the guys with the SA80's on them
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites